Time to Revise Those 2006 Season Predictions!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Grease Monkey
- Category 2
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm
You can make analogs, but I'd still add one or two storms on top of any similar season given the events of the past few years. By "events", I mean storms in the central or eastern Atlantic that, IMO, are now being named when they probably wouldn't have in the past. I think there's a very good chance that some of the tropical cyclones that developed from stagnant upper-level lows towards the end of last season may not have been addressed by NHC had they occurred in the 30's, 40's, etc. It seems that we've seen more of these storms be given names than what I remember from the 90s.
I haven't looked at enough data to given specific numbers, so I'll refrain from hunch-casting
I haven't looked at enough data to given specific numbers, so I'll refrain from hunch-casting

0 likes
- AussieMark
- Category 5
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
- Location: near Sydney, Australia
- Weatherfreak14
- Category 5
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
- Location: Beaufort, SC
- Contact:
- stormchazer
- Category 5
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
- Location: Lakeland, Florida
- Contact:
- stormtruth
- Category 2
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: Time to Revise Those 2006 Season Predictions!
wxman57 wrote:Bored? Want something to do?
Dr. Gray and NOAA get to revise their seasonal predictions, why can't we? Those of you (and there were many) who predicted 20+ named storms this year just might be thinking that you'd overestimated the number a tad. You think? My numbers were 15/8/4.
So, what were your original numbers, and what are your revised numbers for the season? I have a good idea what I'd change, but I want to see your numbers first.
Well, mine were 18/11/6 and yes I'd definitely move down at this point. In fact, I'd say your 15/8/4 looks pretty good to me right now.

0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23693
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: Time to Revise Those 2006 Season Predictions!
x-y-no wrote:wxman57 wrote:Bored? Want something to do?
Dr. Gray and NOAA get to revise their seasonal predictions, why can't we? Those of you (and there were many) who predicted 20+ named storms this year just might be thinking that you'd overestimated the number a tad. You think? My numbers were 15/8/4.
So, what were your original numbers, and what are your revised numbers for the season? I have a good idea what I'd change, but I want to see your numbers first.
Well, mine were 18/11/6 and yes I'd definitely move down at this point. In fact, I'd say your 15/8/4 looks pretty good to me right now.
Mine were at 15/8/4 to begin with and I'm sticking with it. That was based on the fact that 2005 was a fluke and on the statistical avg since 1995 with the active cycle began.

Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
- Hybridstorm_November2001
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
- Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
- Contact:
Well I'll downgrade my numbers even further too:
My old prediction was (I think all the numbers are right);
20/15/7
My new prediction;
15/7/4
My old prediction was (I think all the numbers are right);
20/15/7

My new prediction;
15/7/4
Last edited by Hybridstorm_November2001 on Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes