TS Ernesto Satellite,Analysis and Models Thread #5

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22995
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#41 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:08 pm

Here are the latest "credible" model plots. I removed the BAMs and the extrapolated track. There are no credible models forecasting a west coast of FL landfall. Consensus is improving for a track along the east coast of FL then into the Carolinas.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/ernesto55.gif

Here's a plot of a couple of pretty good consensus models, the ones the NHC has been mentioning in their discussions (CONU, CGUN):

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/ernesto56.gif
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#42 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:09 pm

0 likes   

skufful
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:37 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC

#43 Postby skufful » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:09 pm

wxman57 wrote:Here are the latest "credible" model plots. I removed the BAMs and the extrapolated track. There are no credible models forecasting a west coast of FL landfall. Consensus is improving for a track along the east coast of FL then into the Carolinas.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/ernesto55.gif

Here's a plot of a couple of pretty good consensus models, the ones the NHC has been mentioning in their discussions (CONU, CGUN):

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/ernesto56.gif


With all of the land interaction, hopefully just a huge rain event.
0 likes   

Stormavoider
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Spring Hill Fl.

#44 Postby Stormavoider » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:13 pm

tallywx wrote:
Stormavoider wrote:I am curios about the persistent convection south of Cuba's eastern tip. Could a second LLC have formed under it? If so, how would it figure into things?

Definitely no second LLC under that convection. Radar shows that the convection is in the form of south-north oriented bands feeding into the real LLC just inland off the N coast of Cuba. No chance that a second LLC forms with that flow.

Great point. I should have looked at the GTMO radar before cluttering this thread with another dumb question. Thanks for the reply
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

#45 Postby OuterBanker » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:14 pm

All I know is that I much prefer the 5pm. Kinda gets the OBX off the hook. 11 am looked bad. But this thing has changed at every forecast.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#46 Postby fci » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:14 pm

storms in NC wrote:Like I said it will come in between SC and NC border


How do you know that?

Gut feel, Quija board, Crystal Ball, Tarot Cards....

:lol: :roll: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#47 Postby x-y-no » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:15 pm

Stormavoider wrote:I am curios about the persistent convection south of Cuba's eastern tip. Could a second LLC have formed under it? If so, how would it figure into things?


No second LLC. There's just a lot of upper-level divergence there, and that's continuing to drive convection.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#48 Postby MWatkins » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:15 pm

tallywx wrote:http://www.insmet.cu/asp/genesis.asp?TB0=PLANTILLAS&TB1=RADAR&TB2=../Radar/05Pilon/plnMAXw01a.gif

Cuban radar site pretty close to current center shows definite increase in banding and convection near center. Center is still by no means offshore. Looks like it could ride along that island-ridden coast for quite some time before being "free and clear" to rapidly intensify, unless we get a diurnal convection blowup so significant that it "pulls" the center offshore. I've seen it happen before. Depends on how strong the high north of the system is.


Yes the center is becoming well-defined in radar returns...the increase in thunderstorms just off-shore are wrapping back in. Looks like we have seen Ernesto at his "worst"...in terms of organization. Tonight is going to be very interesting to say the least.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#49 Postby Aquawind » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:18 pm

There are no credible models forecasting a west coast of FL landfall.


That is what I like to come home and see.. :D

Should be interesting IPR coverage tonight MW.. 8-)

Stay Safe!
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22995
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#50 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:19 pm

fci wrote:
storms in NC wrote:Like I said it will come in between SC and NC border


How do you know that?


As we've seen over and over again this year - weak, sheared storms are just about impossible to forecast. Maybe it'll come ashore in SC and wind down inland. If it does, then it may not have the opportunity to become a hurricane before landfall. However, a stalled TS over the Carolinas could drop FEET of rain.

Another very plausible possibility would be for it to do a Dennis/Ophelia stall just offshore before moving back to the west and causing a lot of rain. Could be a significantly stronger storm in that case.
0 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

#51 Postby tallywx » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:21 pm

If Ernesto moves along the 5 p.m. track, that could create a tremendous rain event for central NC. Looks like a front will stall out across NC on Wed., with a warm season CAD (cold-air damming) event piling moisture up against the Appalachians. Ernesto moving in from the south will only serve to tighten the pressure gradient to reinforce this overrunning and upslope-induced precip. That all before the main energy from Ernesto itself moves right over.

We need the rain, that's for sure.
Last edited by tallywx on Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
mikatnight
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:45 am
Location: Lantana, Florida

#52 Postby mikatnight » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:23 pm

With such favorable conditions, why are they forecasting just a Cat 1? Is it possible that it could go to a 2 or a 3? Also, anyone remember Hurricane Cleo, 1964? It's track is similar to the forecase track.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#53 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:24 pm

MWatkins wrote:
tallywx wrote:http://www.insmet.cu/asp/genesis.asp?TB0=PLANTILLAS&TB1=RADAR&TB2=../Radar/05Pilon/plnMAXw01a.gif

Cuban radar site pretty close to current center shows definite increase in banding and convection near center. Center is still by no means offshore. Looks like it could ride along that island-ridden coast for quite some time before being "free and clear" to rapidly intensify, unless we get a diurnal convection blowup so significant that it "pulls" the center offshore. I've seen it happen before. Depends on how strong the high north of the system is.


Yes the center is becoming well-defined in radar returns...the increase in thunderstorms just off-shore are wrapping back in. Looks like we have seen Ernesto at his "worst"...in terms of organization. Tonight is going to be very interesting to say the least.

MW


and a very interesting listen on IPR tonight.
0 likes   

User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2128
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

#54 Postby Canelaw99 » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:26 pm

That's my question mika. I'm still not buying this only a TS scenario. It just doesn't seem to make sense to me....
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#55 Postby Wthrman13 » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:27 pm

mikatnight wrote:With such favorable conditions, why are they forecasting just a Cat 1? Is it possible that it could go to a 2 or a 3? Also, anyone remember Hurricane Cleo, 1964? It's track is similar to the forecase track.


One of the things that is needed for rapid intensification is a fairly-well developed inner core. Ernesto's has been disrupted significantly.
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#56 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:28 pm

wxman57 wrote:Here are the latest "credible" model plots. I removed the BAMs and the extrapolated track. There are no credible models forecasting a west coast of FL landfall. Consensus is improving for a track along the east coast of FL then into the Carolinas.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/ernesto55.gif

Here's a plot of a couple of pretty good consensus models, the ones the NHC has been mentioning in their discussions (CONU, CGUN):

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/ernesto56.gif


If we go back and look at the history of the consensus overall and specifically the GFDL they have been very useful in track forecasting. The intensity portion has no consensus. It's really basically experience over some data. The GFDL had this system going over Cuba when everyone else was still talking about TX. I am sticking with Georgetown SC as a center of landfall after a short time over S FL. The dropsonde data has really put some consistency in the GFDL this go 'round.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6110
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#57 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:28 pm

Does anyone think that it could miss the florida coast and and hit the cap hatteras area on its recurve out to sea?
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#58 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:29 pm

Using my best eye, I think the center is still well overland.

This could mean a more west track?
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5330
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#59 Postby Nimbus » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 pm

NHC said in the 5 PM advisory that there is only a twenty percent chance of Ernesto exploding into a major hurricane.

If the storm had been well developed with an eye when it traveled over cuba I would have agreed with those figures. A weaker tropical storm has a better chance of redeveloping over warm SST's with the low shear.

There may be other resons why Ernesto should remain a tropical storm, but the storm is already back out over the water and will be pulling away from the Cuban coastline.
0 likes   

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

#60 Postby WxGuy1 » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 pm

Re: ingredients for rapid intensification... Please refer to Rapid Intensity Predictor, part of Estimating the probability of tropical cyclone rapid intensification (RI)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kludge, TampaWxLurker and 41 guests