

Above is a good closeup of the upper low developing just north of the Leewards and the interaction with the wave occuring to the east of it.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
AJC3 wrote:
Here's my take, based on what I see in water vapor imagery and from the ECM/GFS H25 wind/divergence forecasts over the next couple of days.
There is a well defined H25 shear axis running ENE from the Mona Passage into the central ATLC, separating a strong 50-70KT ENE jet streak (running from 25N60W into eastern Cuba/Hispanola) from a 40-50kt WSW jet streak (strecthing ENE-ward from the northern Leewards). Water Vapor imagery shows an ULL forming in the north and NE of PR/USVI, which should do two things:
1) As H25 winds become more out of the SW and weaken slighly, shear should weaken as a result (from "extremely hostile" to "pretty unfavorable, but not ridiculously prohibitive", if you get my drift).
2) Create an area of strong H25 divergence near and near and to the east/northeast of the LA.
What I expect over the next day or two is for the wave to become even more convectively active, owing to increasing divergence/forced ascent. If there is enough of a convective burst over the wave, there may be enough pressure falls to spin up a weak vortex, given the T-wave in that area was already showing some broad cyclonic turning. However, after any ULL that forms near/north of PR is progged to be weak/transient, and thus H25 winds are forecast to veer around to NW at about 15kt, give or take. Given the wave will be embedded in low level E-ESE flow of at least 10-15kt, that would translate into ~25-30kt of shear.
I'd give it about a 50/50 shot at becoming an invest over the next 2 days, but only about a 5% chance to actually become a TC.
Blown_away wrote:18z GFS at 156 hours - Which low is it, the one N of PR or the one in the NE Gulf?
Ed Mahmoud wrote:JB says he will be 'simply wrong' if a TC doesn't develop in the Western Caribbean in 5 to 10 days.
Ed Mahmoud wrote:JB says he will be 'simply wrong' if a TC doesn't develop in the Western Caribbean in 5 to 10 days.
hurricanetrack wrote:wxman57 said "what the European is seeing - just a frontal wave in a high-shear environment"
But the 200mb map at 168 hours shows an anti-cyclone over the NW Caribbean with less than 3 knots right over the surface low. This is the latest run, the 00z. Would this be considered a high shear environment? I am just a little confused since this is exactly what the ECMWF 200mb map shows at 168 hours. I cannot post a link to it b/c I am looking at it on a pay site but I am sure someone can find it and post it here.
Actually, the Euro shows very little shear at 200mb throughout most of its 00z run over the NW Caribbean.
An area of disturbed weather has developed near the northern Lesser Antilles Islands, due to a westward-moving tropical wave interacting with an upper-level low. Wind shear is currently too high (30 knots) to allow development of this disturbance. However, the past two runs of the NOGAPS model have predicted that wind shear will fall enough by Friday to allow a tropical depression to form near the western Bahamas. This storm is predicted to move westward across eastern Cuba and into the Western Caribbean. The GFS model does not go along with this scenario, but hints at a weak system developing and moving northeast out sea over the middle Atlantic. The UKMET and ECMWF models do not develop a Bahamas storm, either, but do show a large region of low pressure with low wind shear developing over the Western Caribbean later this week. It would not be a surprise to see a tropical depression develop in the Western Caribbean late this week or early next week.
wxman57 wrote:hurricanetrack wrote:wxman57 said "what the European is seeing - just a frontal wave in a high-shear environment"
But the 200mb map at 168 hours shows an anti-cyclone over the NW Caribbean with less than 3 knots right over the surface low. This is the latest run, the 00z. Would this be considered a high shear environment? I am just a little confused since this is exactly what the ECMWF 200mb map shows at 168 hours. I cannot post a link to it b/c I am looking at it on a pay site but I am sure someone can find it and post it here.
Actually, the Euro shows very little shear at 200mb throughout most of its 00z run over the NW Caribbean.
What I was attempting to say is that I don't believe a storm will develop in the NW Caribbean (as the European model is indicating), but that the ECMWF may be picking up on energy associated with the strong cold front over the SE Gulf and incorrectly developing a low in the NW Caribbean rather than along the front.
It's still possible to see another storm in the western Caribbean this season, but it's looking less likely every day.
Users browsing this forum: Ulf and 89 guests