Tropical Depression #5,Analysis,Sat Pics,Models Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Trugunzn
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 549
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:59 pm

#401 Postby Trugunzn » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:02 pm

Thhis is not weaking. By the looks of it it looks like it slowed down and now starting to organize it self!

Image
Last edited by Trugunzn on Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Josephine96

#402 Postby Josephine96 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:03 pm

I know they said it would slow down..

No need to shout btw :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Cape Verde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 564
Age: 70
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: Houston area

#403 Postby Cape Verde » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:04 pm

The models were designed by mets, in conjunction with the programmers. It's fun to look at them, but if there was a model that worked, there wouldn't be any other models.

Models often disagree, as do mets. Neither one is right all the time, even if you kind of take a majority vote of them.

All you can do is weigh the evidence and opinions of all those involved and assign your own probabilities. I'm quite sure we'll never get the science down to the point where we can predict landfall a week out with any degree of accuracy during my lifetime. I'm pretty satisfied that we have a pretty good track record three days out.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#404 Postby Scorpion » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:05 pm

It is very easy to notice that this is not going to be another Chantal or Claudette. Looking at the deep convection and the huge envelope it's looking quite ominous.
0 likes   

User avatar
Trugunzn
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 549
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:59 pm

#405 Postby Trugunzn » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:06 pm

I Have a bad feeling what its trying to do right now.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#406 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:07 pm

The key will be whether the High is centered over Florida or to its east. If the high is further east of Florida anywhere from TX to the FL Panhandle could get a visit. If its centered over Florida then it will most likely be a western LA or TX hit.

Also I've seen some depictions of an ULL over the western Gulf next week, I think its the one now over Cuba, if this plays out it might give us a weaker system for a TX hit whereas the other scenario with the ridge east of Florida would allow for a much stronger storm in the central or eastern Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#407 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:07 pm

Scorpion wrote:It is very easy to notice that this is not going to be another Chantal or Claudette. Looking at the deep convection and the huge envelope it's looking quite ominous.
yeah, this could be a large storm (in terms of size).
0 likes   

the_winds_that_sheared_me
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:15 pm
Location: Orange Park, Fla

#408 Postby the_winds_that_sheared_me » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:10 pm

skysummit wrote:
Could this be why the latest tropical models shifted north a bit?


Them Bam models are Based a model behind I believe. So the 00z runs were based on the 18z GFS. Which brings me to a sortof a Question kinda sorta??? Why do we look at the Bam's/GFDL when they are based on the GFS which does not even show the system? I notice the NHC does look at these models as well as the GFDL which are based on the GFS meanwhile, the GFS doesnt even know there is a closed system.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38106
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#409 Postby Brent » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:10 pm

Named storm or #5..? Kinda curious.. I'm guessing because it's moving so fast, it may be having issues getting going.

Perhaps Ernesto @ 11.. but maybe not till tomorrow..

If my reasoning is way off base, excuse it


I don't think so at 11... but defintely tomorrow IMO.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4832
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#410 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:12 pm

Based on the latest model runs I'd expect the NHC track to shift northward in the 3-5 day time frame. The 5 PM track is now on the south side of the guidance.

http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/omd/ops/weathe ... orm_05.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22997
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#411 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:16 pm

The latest GFDL details. I think it's too far east into the projected ridge. Note how much faster it is than the NHC forecast, though:

HOUR: .0 LONG: -62.63 LAT: 12.09 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1003.88 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 24.18
HOUR: 6.0 LONG: -63.53 LAT: 12.39 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1006.26 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 32.64
HOUR: 12.0 LONG: -64.69 LAT: 12.41 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1004.44 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 44.80
HOUR: 18.0 LONG: -65.97 LAT: 13.00 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1004.25 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 41.13
HOUR: 24.0 LONG: -66.97 LAT: 13.58 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1002.58 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 50.00
HOUR: 30.0 LONG: -67.94 LAT: 13.93 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1002.40 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 45.13
HOUR: 36.0 LONG: -69.11 LAT: 14.40 MIN PRESS (hPa): 1000.81 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 49.41
HOUR: 42.0 LONG: -70.29 LAT: 15.08 MIN PRESS (hPa): 996.97 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 57.15
HOUR: 48.0 LONG: -71.27 LAT: 15.57 MIN PRESS (hPa): 997.04 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 54.38
HOUR: 54.0 LONG: -72.09 LAT: 16.27 MIN PRESS (hPa): 993.92 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 57.63
HOUR: 60.0 LONG: -73.05 LAT: 17.30 MIN PRESS (hPa): 988.87 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 71.81
HOUR: 66.0 LONG: -74.31 LAT: 18.51 MIN PRESS (hPa): 986.88 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 70.99
HOUR: 72.0 LONG: -75.65 LAT: 19.47 MIN PRESS (hPa): 986.37 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 73.25
HOUR: 78.0 LONG: -76.94 LAT: 20.35 MIN PRESS (hPa): 983.88 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 55.12
HOUR: 84.0 LONG: -78.41 LAT: 21.04 MIN PRESS (hPa): 990.06 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 53.39
HOUR: 90.0 LONG: -79.77 LAT: 21.70 MIN PRESS (hPa): 993.11 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 53.42
HOUR: 96.0 LONG: -81.07 LAT: 22.42 MIN PRESS (hPa): 993.50 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 62.56
HOUR:102.0 LONG: -82.14 LAT: 22.94 MIN PRESS (hPa): 989.90 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 61.12
HOUR:108.0 LONG: -83.25 LAT: 23.82 MIN PRESS (hPa): 983.64 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 80.53
HOUR:114.0 LONG: -84.45 LAT: 24.48 MIN PRESS (hPa): 979.61 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 81.49
HOUR:120.0 LONG: -85.37 LAT: 24.88 MIN PRESS (hPa): 977.31 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 80.55
HOUR:126.0 LONG: -85.94 LAT: 25.66 MIN PRESS (hPa): 969.70 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 89.08
0 likes   

flyingphish
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 8:35 pm

#412 Postby flyingphish » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:16 pm

If the ULL to the west of the disturbance moves west, in tandem..it could ventilate the depression and make it stronger. This possibly could be a very powerful storm. Unfortunately..if this happens..somebody suffers. There is no fish solution on this one.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#413 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:17 pm

Brent wrote:
Named storm or #5..? Kinda curious.. I'm guessing because it's moving so fast, it may be having issues getting going.

Perhaps Ernesto @ 11.. but maybe not till tomorrow..

If my reasoning is way off base, excuse it


I don't think so at 11... but defintely tomorrow IMO.


No Ernesto at 11....gonna have to wait until tomorrow...
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4832
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#414 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:18 pm

the_winds_that_sheared_me wrote:
skysummit wrote:
Could this be why the latest tropical models shifted north a bit?


Them Bam models are Based a model behind I believe. So the 00z runs were based on the 18z GFS. Which brings me to a sortof a Question kinda sorta??? Why do we look at the Bam's/GFDL when they are based on the GFS which does not even show the system? I notice the NHC does look at these models as well as the GFDL which are based on the GFS meanwhile, the GFS doesnt even know there is a closed system.


True the GFS doesn't reflect the deeper cyclone but...the GFS is one of the two big global models (the other the European) which really model the large scale evolution of weather patterns on the globe. If you go to the HPC discussions, they will typically choose between the GFS or Euro or some blend to decide on long-range forecasts. They also look at UKMET, CMC, NOGAPs too.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#415 Postby deltadog03 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:18 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Brent wrote:
Named storm or #5..? Kinda curious.. I'm guessing because it's moving so fast, it may be having issues getting going.

Perhaps Ernesto @ 11.. but maybe not till tomorrow..

If my reasoning is way off base, excuse it


I don't think so at 11... but defintely tomorrow IMO.


No Ernesto at 11....gonna have to wait until tomorrow...


T numbers are up...2.0??
0 likes   

the_winds_that_sheared_me
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:15 pm
Location: Orange Park, Fla

#416 Postby the_winds_that_sheared_me » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:20 pm

ronjon wrote:Based on the latest model runs I'd expect the NHC track to shift northward in the 3-5 day time frame. The 5 PM track is now on the south side of the guidance.

http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/omd/ops/weathe ... orm_05.gif

Yeah, I have to agree, NHC is now alone with the exception of the clipper 5 (climo model). Hey, Isnt it Stewarts shift???? If so, could be an interresting read tonight :)
0 likes   

Scorpion

#417 Postby Scorpion » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:20 pm

If Stewart is doing it then I am definitely staying up.
0 likes   

crab_storm

#418 Postby crab_storm » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:21 pm

he'll be named at 10pm. looks like he has everything he needs. Even the NHC forcast shows it being a storm by 2am.
Last edited by crab_storm on Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#419 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:21 pm

It looks to me that the LLC is already slightly north of the NHC forecasted track.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#420 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:21 pm

will there be a 2am?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kevin, ljmac75 and 37 guests