kevin wrote:Sanibel, while I respect your observations : heart is simply unscientific and should not be used. Even if it means much more typing. A storm actually is the sum of its environmental conditions. The exact same storm in a different environment will not be the exact same storm. I am not well versed in meteorology, but there is no such thing as a storm 'fighting shear'.
Sometimes shear enhances convection, which is one reason I think this is a popular view.
Essential to human communication is a phenomena known as "figurative language." One form of "figurative language" is "anthropomorphism", which is the attribution of human qualities and emotions to non-human things.
I understood what Sanibel meant. Saying that a storm has "heart" is short hand for saying "this storm has continued to exist in the face of adverse conditions, and we should not discount the possiblity that, for reasons currently unknown to us, it will continue to exist."
Personally, I'd rather say that the storm has "heart." I think an English teacher would agree.