TS Ernesto Satellite,Analysis and Models Thread #6
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Emmett_Brown
- Category 5
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Sarasota FL
ok... here goes... I dont think we have a well defined LLC at this time... i think there is an LLC, but it is weak, and it could reform. In the short term, i am focusing on the overall movement of the entire cloudmass, which clearly appears to be moving W/NW. Winds at 500 amd 300 mb are increasing from the E/SE, and this is driving the convestion W/NW. Just like before, when Ernie was kicked N in contstant center reformations, i believe we are now seeing Easterly shear in the short term that could force center reformations in a more W direction.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/3hh_12.gif
That is also why he is slow to strengthen... shear. I think there is a good chance he "reforms" in Westerly hops, and ends up meandering around Key West tonight.
That's my take.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/3hh_12.gif
That is also why he is slow to strengthen... shear. I think there is a good chance he "reforms" in Westerly hops, and ends up meandering around Key West tonight.
That's my take.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm
WNW'ers. Just wait, the center will become more clear when it gets closer. Trust me, I have a REAL STAKE in it skirting the west coast after intensifying over the Straits.
The problem here is the radar beam shoots straight out while the horizon curves away. At that distance you think you are seeing the surface center, but you are not. You are seeing the higher clouds that are obscuring the real center behind them at that distance.
I already made some basic mistakes myself while the storm was on the tip of Haiti. It was further south than what I was seeing.
The problem here is the radar beam shoots straight out while the horizon curves away. At that distance you think you are seeing the surface center, but you are not. You are seeing the higher clouds that are obscuring the real center behind them at that distance.
I already made some basic mistakes myself while the storm was on the tip of Haiti. It was further south than what I was seeing.
Last edited by Sanibel on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-avn.html
Ernesto strikes...Getting flared up...Look at at the hot spots...
Put it this way...We, on the east coast, are going to get soaked and some good wind with some nasty gusts. WNW, NW...doesn't matter much...I think us in western Palm Beach County (Wellington) are going to experience Ernie in a way that that we are not quite expecting...Not Wilma, but def. not what I'm hearing people say...
Ernesto strikes...Getting flared up...Look at at the hot spots...
Put it this way...We, on the east coast, are going to get soaked and some good wind with some nasty gusts. WNW, NW...doesn't matter much...I think us in western Palm Beach County (Wellington) are going to experience Ernie in a way that that we are not quite expecting...Not Wilma, but def. not what I'm hearing people say...
0 likes
- Aquawind
- Category 5
- Posts: 6714
- Age: 62
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
- Location: Salisbury, NC
- Contact:
New convection firing on the backside..tis organizing alrighty.. pressure drops this afternoon..
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
0 likes
getting interesting lots of flore up betreen frame 14 and 15
http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/o ... loope.html
http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/o ... loope.html
0 likes
The LLC /eye just off the Cuba coast is clearly visible on the last frame of this loop if ya pause it . Anyone else see that ?
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... tte=ir.pal
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... tte=ir.pal
0 likes
Sanibel wrote:WNW'ers. Just wait, the center will become more clear when it gets closer. Trust me, I have a REAL STAKE in it skirting the west coast after intensifying over the Straits.
The problem here is the radar beam shoots straight out while the horizon curves away. At that distance you think you are seeing the surface center, but your are not. You are seeing the higher clouds that are obscuring the real center behind them at that distance.
I already made some basic mistakes myself while the storm was on the tip of Haiti. It was further south than what I was seeing.
I don't want to be categorized as a person wanting it to go "WNW". Sanibel I have a REAL STAKE in this stay away from your area as well. My folks live at Burnt Store Marina on the Lee County Line.

Last edited by shawn67 on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm
TreasureIslandFLGal wrote:Although I really have a lot of faith in the NHC, personally, I am still going to watch BayNews9 locally in Tampa Bay since they are leaving a few options open at least so that viewers are less likely to be caught off guard if the track does shift more. Obviously they have to tow the NHC line a bit, but I have noticed that most of their forecasters tend to also add the other tidbits, like explaining why some of the outlier models may be seeing what they are seeing. That helps teach the interactions too for all the viewers.
Although I catch the other stations too to get their opinions, I find that many of them use a lot of absolutes and seem to casually dismiss other options entirely. That will make thier viewers be caught by suprise if they believe their Mets all the time. (i.e. Fox 13's met spoke with certainty on Thurs and Fri night that it would hit Texas or Louisiana and that we had nothing at all to worry about here in Florida! -I hope people didn't spend money or make big plans based on that! CNN is also notorious for giving no details at all and very absolute ideas; maybe due to their time restraints.)
There was not a met in the business that did not expect a track into the western or central Gulf Of Mexico last Thursday. Looking back on the upper air forecast models last week current this track was an unlikely if not impossible scenario. We all understand that this is an inexact science but we are all paid to make the BEST forecast with the BEST tools available and even then there will be forecasts that will bust. It is more important to acknowledge that a forecast is going to be wrong, explain why it was wrong, and then move on to improve on the forecast. MOST viewers respect that.
0 likes
- TreasureIslandFLGal
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1581
- Age: 57
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
- Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!
fox13weather,
Your consequences may be lost credibility. Another's consequences could be lost life or property. Again, I appreciate all the view's and opinions of my local forecasters. But, I personally think it is irresponsible for anyone who knows that their words are going to be taken verbatum to take any such stance without a caveat. That's the main point I wanted to make. Nobody's perfect and predicting the weather is certainly not a perfect science. (Heck, I don't think any of us nailed this storm early on!) I will always defer to those who know more than me about it. Some folks defer completely. For those who believe that the science is so modern and perfect now... the weatherguys have to be careful to remind those people that it is not perfect yet and acknowledge that there is at least the possibility that they may be wrong as new data comes in when dealing with poteentially life threatening situations. -just my opinion.
Your consequences may be lost credibility. Another's consequences could be lost life or property. Again, I appreciate all the view's and opinions of my local forecasters. But, I personally think it is irresponsible for anyone who knows that their words are going to be taken verbatum to take any such stance without a caveat. That's the main point I wanted to make. Nobody's perfect and predicting the weather is certainly not a perfect science. (Heck, I don't think any of us nailed this storm early on!) I will always defer to those who know more than me about it. Some folks defer completely. For those who believe that the science is so modern and perfect now... the weatherguys have to be careful to remind those people that it is not perfect yet and acknowledge that there is at least the possibility that they may be wrong as new data comes in when dealing with poteentially life threatening situations. -just my opinion.
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23692
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Aquawind wrote:gatorcane wrote:if this just had about 24 more hours over water...south florida would be in BIG trouble.
Agreed.. Given this open water in this enviroment we are talkin major intensification.. Hope no slow down occurs for any turn like so often is the case..
I do hope the turn is swift and it does not try to stall or barely move for a bit.

0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA