TD#9

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

#461 Postby caribepr » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:27 pm

elysium wrote:I am not minimalizing the threat. I am merely stating that it is premature to suggest east coast landfall. If someone wants to advise that the residents in the islands need to watch this one, that is perfectly acceptable. Until there is clear evidence of intensification for at least 6 hours, advising about east coast landfall would, in my estimation, be jumping the gun a little. This is not yet officially even a tropical storm. It is a very serious situation for the islands until we see more northward movement.


Hey thanks! I'll get the word out 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
cinlfla
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast

#462 Postby cinlfla » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:30 pm

I am not minimalizing the threat. I am merely stating that it is premature to suggest east coast landfall. If someone wants to advise that the residents in the islands need to watch this one, that is perfectly acceptable. Until there is clear evidence of intensification for at least 6 hours, advising about east coast landfall would, in my estimation, be jumping the gun a little. This is not yet officially even a tropical storm. It is a very serious situation for the islands until we see more northward movement.




Umm, not trying to be rude or anything but your contradicting yourself
" This is not yet officially even a tropical storm. It is a very serious situation for the islands until we see more northward movement"

If its not a tropical storm which we all know its not then why is it a serious situation for the islands?
0 likes   

gkrangers

#463 Postby gkrangers » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:31 pm

TD9 would have to go due west at this point to even affect the most northward lesser/greater antilles.

The biggest threat from TD9/Irene to the antilles will be rip currents and beach erosion.

This is not official bla bla bla..
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

#464 Postby sma10 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:33 pm

elysium wrote:I am not minimalizing the threat. I am merely stating that it is premature to suggest east coast landfall. If someone wants to advise that the residents in the islands need to watch this one, that is perfectly acceptable. Until there is clear evidence of intensification for at least 6 hours, advising about east coast landfall would, in my estimation, be jumping the gun a little. This is not yet officially even a tropical storm. It is a very serious situation for the islands until we see more northward movement.


Can you provide ANY evidence as to why this should be considered a "very serious situation for the islands"? Don't you think that declaring TD9 a "very serious situation for the islands" might be a bit of an exaggeration at this point?
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#465 Postby hurricanedude » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:34 pm

Its there opinion, take it or leave it
0 likes   

Homey
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:41 pm

#466 Postby Homey » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:38 pm

"minimalizing"................is that a word.........what does it mean?
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#467 Postby hurricanedude » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:39 pm

reducing the threat...simple !!! :roll:
0 likes   

elysium

#468 Postby elysium » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:42 pm

O.K., well now that I have seen where this storm is relative to the Leewards, you are right. This isn't something that the islands needs to watch. It appears as though T.D. 9 is nearly north of that latitude now. Not sure that it is completely out of the question for possible interaction with the northern islands, but highly unlikely.

It just appeared for a while that T.D. 9 might still possibly move west sooner, but that's not likely. But it did look a little west there for a while.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23001
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#469 Postby wxman57 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:44 pm

elysium wrote:T.D. 9 will have to pull farther to the north than it is doing at this hour before clearing the Greater Antilles is safely assumable. In about 72 hours the last possibility for any appreciable northward movement will have passed until late in the forecast period at around day 9 or 10.


The center of TD 9 is already 60nm north of the northern Greater Antilles.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145976
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#470 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:44 pm

elysium wrote:It is a little premature to suggest at this early juncture that T.D. 9 is an imminent threat to the east coast. What it is that we are witnessing taking shape is only the early beginnings of an Andrew like scenario in which a rapidly intensifying hurricane is positioned under a building ridge locked onto a westward heading, travelling through the south central/ southern Bahamas. Since T.D. 9 or 95L has not yet even reached tropical storm status, we must wait until clear evidence comes into the forum suggesting that at least a moderate intensification cycle has begun. And while i have pretty much grown tired reminding everyone that 95L may yet still run itself out, until we have clear-cut evidence of intensification, we should refrain from any declarations of east coast landfall. Only frame by frame review of satellite download suggestive that an intensification process is clearly underway will free us to post declarations on possible landfall targets. What must not jump the gun.


It's already north of the islands in latitud (Now 19.0n) so your statement is way off the mark and please the next time base your opinions with scientific data.
Last edited by cycloneye on Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#471 Postby Sanibel » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:46 pm

It could be that this west wobble is the storm releasing from the ULL...
0 likes   

gkrangers

#472 Postby gkrangers » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:49 pm

AHHHHHHHHHH ITS WOBBLING WEST BARBADOS LOOK OUT!!!



:lol:
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#473 Postby Sanibel » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:54 pm

Because someone says the word "wobble" does not merit a pavlovian ridicule post.


Harvey is shooting north while TD9 is wobbling west. Could be the sign of a building ridge between the two (missing trough)...
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#474 Postby storms in NC » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:58 pm

Sanibel wrote:Because someone says the word "wobble" does not merit a pavlovian ridicule post.

Harvey is shooting north while TD9 is wobbling west. Could be the sign of a building ridge between the two (missing trough)...




I think you are right on that one Sanibel
And also when the reports come out they are about a hour old.
Last edited by storms in NC on Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#475 Postby gkrangers » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:58 pm

Sanibel wrote:Because someone says the word "wobble" does not merit a pavlovian ridicule post.


Harvey is shooting north while TD9 is wobbling west. Could be the sign of a building ridge between the two (missing trough)...
It wasn't meant as a shot at you.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#476 Postby deltadog03 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:09 pm

yeah, ridge is building.....this did NOT interact directly...as far as path with that ULL...the northward repo was due to the center....also, this should continue to move around 270-280 with the Low Level Steering currents....not 300 like NHC says...
0 likes   

elysium

#477 Postby elysium » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:11 pm

I should have said that I'm not reducing the the significance of the threat down to minimum level, it is just that discussions about possible east coast landfall are a little premature at this hour. But yes, T.D. 9 has in fact moved north of all the islands and is not heading west but rather west northwest. Actually, i had T.D. 9 due east of the northern most islands and thought that there was still some possibility of it heading west at that point. So I just wanted to make it clear that while we shouldn't prognosticate on east coast landfall, it wouldn't be too much to suggest that the islands consider this as a possible threat. In so doing I was clearly mistaken.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#478 Postby Ivanhater » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:12 pm

hmm, when does the nhc think the trough will pick it up? i would think we should see a pull more toward the north soon if it was going to recurve
0 likes   

User avatar
cinlfla
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast

#479 Postby cinlfla » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:21 pm

I just checked the 5:00 adv and it says its moving wnw.....nope I just looked and it looks to be moving due west, somebody needs new glasses.
0 likes   

User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

#480 Postby caribepr » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:32 pm

elysium wrote: ...So I just wanted to make it clear that while we shouldn't prognosticate on east coast landfall, it wouldn't be too much to suggest that the islands consider this as a possible threat. In so doing I was clearly mistaken.


Nice retraction, good on ya!

As Cycloneye said, some scientific facts in backing up very strong opinions are a good thing for everyone. Nothing wrong with being an opinion of one or a dozen, if there is some reasoning given, even if it's just "that's my gut feeling" - that way other readers can give value accordingly.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CFLHurricane, Hurrilurker, scotto and 71 guests