2005 Atl Reports=Unnamed Subtropical Storm Report Posted

[cycloneye]

Tropical Storm Arlene= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL012005_Arlene.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2005arlene.shtml

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/AR ... hics.shtml







Tropical Storm Bret= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL022005_Bret.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/BR ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Cindy= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL032005_Cindy.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/CI ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Dennis= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL042005_Dennis.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/DE ... hics.shtml







Hurricane Emily= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL052005_Emily.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/EM ... hics.shtml






Tropical Storm Franklin= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL062005_Franklin.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/FR ... hics.shtml






Tropical Storm Gert= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL072005_Gert.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/GE ... hics.shtml






Tropical Storm Harvey= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL082005_Harvey.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/HA ... hics.shtml





Hurricane Irene= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL092005_Irene.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/IR ... hics.shtml





Tropical Depression Ten= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL102005_Ten.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/TEN_graphics.shtml





Tropical Storm Jose= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL112005_Jose.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/JO ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Katrina= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/KA ... hics.shtml





Tropical Storm Lee= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL132005_Lee.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/LEE_graphics.shtml






Hurricane Maria= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL142005_Maria.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/MA ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Nate= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL152005_Nate.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/NA ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Ophelia= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL162005_Ophelia.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/OP ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Philippe= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL172005_Philippe.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/PH ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Rita= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL182005_Rita.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/RI ... hics.shtml







Tropical Depression Nineteen= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL192005_Nineteen.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/NI ... hics.shtml






Hurricane Stan= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL202005_Stan.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/ST ... hics.shtml







Tropical Storm Tammy= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL212005_Tammy.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/TA ... hics.shtml







Sub-Tropical Depression Twenty-Two= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL222005_Twenty-two.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/TW ... hics.shtml







Hurricane Vince= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL232005_Vince.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/VI ... hics.shtml







Hurricane Wilma= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL242005_Wilma.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/WI ... hics.shtml








Tropical Storm Alpha= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL252005_Alpha.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/AL ... hics.shtml







Hurricane Beta= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL262005_Beta.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/BE ... hics.shtml







Tropical Storm Gamma= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL272005_Gamma.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/GA ... hics.shtml







Tropical Storm Delta= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL282005_Delta.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/DE ... hics.shtml







Hurricane Epsilon= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL292005_Epsilon.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/EP ... hics.shtml







Tropical Storm Zeta= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL302005_Zeta.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/ZE ... hics.shtml



The big question is if after the Beta report is up will they issue a report on the unamed system.

[HURAKAN]

The big question is if after the Beta report is up will they issue a report on the unamed system.

I got this:

Dear Sandy,

You are welcome.

If it is decided to add another system to the season total, we will make this information public via our web page. You might want to periodically check there for updates, although I do not expect a final decision for at least a couple of weeks.

Best regards,

James


On Mar 25, 2006, at 7:20 AM, Sandy Delgado wrote:

First, thanks for all the information you have been providing. Now, no decision yet on the unnamed storm?

The good thing is that when you ask, they answer!

[quandary]

2005 is the season that never ends. Even Zeta was not the last storm. Apparently 2005 can never fail to satisfy.

[Weatherfreak000]

Well, techinically it was the last storm. Considering it moved into 2006 there is no way it couldn't have been.


We're questioning a storm before Zeta that formed.

[f5]

2005 is very greedy as far as tropical records are concerned

[MidwestWX]

Im outraged over downing Rita to 115. SHould have stayed 120mph as the damage I saw looks pretty bad.

[Derek Ortt]

again, damage is not factored into the landfall intensity, only the scientific data is

[MidwestWX]

again, damage is not factored into the landfall intensity, only the scientific data is

Your right to a extent as building structure plays a factor too. I like to go by tree and plant damage to acess intensity. However in Katrina some of the forest damage looked more than 125mph.

[cycloneye]

Derek dont replie again to that person as he is great one but he is out now.

[Dr. Jonah Rainwater]

How can you respond seriously to a person with a signature like that one?

[MiamiensisWx]

I bet he put Katrina in there just to upset everyone.

[cycloneye]

I took out the sticky as there are many announcements and stickys at the forum.When the Beta report is released and if the unamed system report comes???it will be a sticky again.

[Matt-hurricanewatcher]

again, damage is not factored into the landfall intensity, only the scientific data is

Your right to a extent as building structure plays a factor too. I like to go by tree and plant damage to acess intensity. However in Katrina some of the forest damage looked more than 125mph.

I agree Katrina was more like 125 to 130 at landfall. Like where do they get the data to support it being less then a cat3? While at the same time the whole coast is gone with out measuring things to mesure the winds. No proof whats so ever.

[cycloneye]

I took out the sticky as there are many announcements and stickys at the forum.When the Beta report is released and if the unamed system report comes???it will be a sticky again.Let's see if this week the Beta report is released.

[Scorpion]

again, damage is not factored into the landfall intensity, only the scientific data is

Your right to a extent as building structure plays a factor too. I like to go by tree and plant damage to acess intensity. However in Katrina some of the forest damage looked more than 125mph.

I agree Katrina was more like 125 to 130 at landfall. Like where do they get the data to support it being less then a cat3? While at the same time the whole coast is gone with out measuring things to mesure the winds. No proof whats so ever.

Katrina WAS 125 mph at landfall.

[HurricaneHunter914]

Okay can we stick to the topic of this thread and stop critisizing.

[Andrew92]

(yes, I haven't posted in a while, been busy, but anyway, back to the topic)

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL262005_Beta.pdf

Beta report is up!

[cycloneye]

Andrew great minds think alike.The report just came out and I was going to post the announcement but you did it first. How is the report in your view about what you were expecting? As promised it's a sticky again.

Now the question is if they will issue a report on the unamed system.

[Andrew92]

Andrew great minds think alike.The report just came out and I was going to post the announcement but you did it first. How is the report in your view about what you were expecting? As promised it's a sticky again.

Now the question is if they will issue a report on the unamed system.

I am very shocked and overjoyed that, even after re-analysis, no one was killed by Hurricane Beta. This is a miracle, considering it hit a poor country and was a Category 2 hurricane (usually a very deadly combination). I was hoping to hear a little more about the damage, but hazarding a guess, if Beta was really assigned a person's name (for instance, had been named Tammy instead), I don't think it would have been retired.

I'm glad after reading this, my friend who is and will be in Nicaragua until the end of December made it through OK (even though I did hear from her once since the hurricane).

Lastly, I believe there will be a report on the new system. I think I remember reading that somewhere. I don't remember where exactly though, because I've been so busy with school lately.

-Andrew92

[Margie]

Your [sic] right to a extent as building structure plays a factor too. I like to go by tree and plant damage to acess [sic] intensity. However in Katrina some of the forest damage looked more than 125mph.

It only takes 75-80mph winds for blowdown (check out the many derechos in the upper midwest). 75-90mph winds in a notable derecho downed around half a million trees in the Mpls-St Paul area. Same thing occured with Wilma; exacerbated with saturated or loose soil (sandy, in the case of FL, peat on top of rock in the BWCA of MN). Also slash pine in the south will go down in about 70-75mph winds and snap off at about 10 feet up; in one afternoon at Waveland I took three separate photos of this type of occurance, which would have been prior to surge inundation; the highest winds come after the surge.