When will 90L be up at NRL?

#1 Postby **cycloneye** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:31 pm

Lets see how the members vote in this poll about when invest 90L will be up at the navy site.

I say by tuesday afternoon.

MiamiensisWx · #2 Postby **MiamiensisWx** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:35 pm

Tuesday night (probably very close to midnight per EDT)

I don't expect classification prior to this time, which is my earliest estimate.

#3 Postby **Vortex** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:35 pm

I say wednesday morning.

KWT · #4 Postby **KWT** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:37 pm

I will say Wednesday morning, I do think that the area of convection that is slowly expanding in the SW Caribbean and the EPAC but still probably 36-48hrs before at least being invest worthy though that depends on whether it tracks overland or not.

x-y-no · #5 Postby **x-y-no** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:38 pm

I went for Wednesday evening.

#6 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:40 pm

I said Thursday.

Cyclone1 · #7 Postby **Cyclone1** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:40 pm

Tomorrow night.

It gets me all worked up just thinking about it. (10 cool points for whoever tells me what I was referencing there.)

YouTube · #8 Postby **hurricanetrack** » Mon May 26, 2008 3:59 pm

90L? What about an STDS? Think we'll see one of those before June 1 arrives? If GFS has its way, then we should indeed. Interesting to see the global models and how they are trying to handle this feature.

Eyewall · #9 Postby **Eyewall** » Mon May 26, 2008 4:00 pm

I said Wednesday morning. :bday:

#10 Postby **RL3AO** » Mon May 26, 2008 4:02 pm

Has something happened in the past three hours to cause this thread? (Just got home)

MiamiensisWx · #11 Postby **MiamiensisWx** » Mon May 26, 2008 4:05 pm

RL3AO wrote:Has something happened in the past three hours to cause this thread? (Just got home)

My post did it.

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=100933&p=1711992&hilit=#p1711992

#12 Postby **cycloneye** » Mon May 26, 2008 4:06 pm

RL3AO wrote:Has something happened in the past three hours to cause this thread? (Just got home)

And this.

#13 Postby **RL3AO** » Mon May 26, 2008 4:08 pm

Anyway, I voted "90L will not be up at NRL for this disturbance".

#14 Postby **cycloneye** » Mon May 26, 2008 8:10 pm

RL3AO wrote:Anyway, I voted "90L will not be up at NRL for this disturbance".

What may be up sooner may be 90E.

MiamiensisWx · #15 Postby **MiamiensisWx** » Mon May 26, 2008 8:12 pm

cycloneye wrote:What may be up sooner may be 90E.

...which is the precursor to 90L, in my view.

Cyclone1 · #16 Postby **Cyclone1** » Mon May 26, 2008 8:13 pm

cycloneye wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Anyway, I voted "90L will not be up at NRL for this disturbance".

What may be up sooner may be 90E.

Honestly, I think the only reason it was mentioned in the EPAC TWO is because the system deserved a TWO mention but not a STDS. It's in the EPAC, but it's so broad it spans between both basins. Even in that TWO they mention it will likely drift eastward. I think 90L would be more likely.

Opal storm · #17 Postby **Opal storm** » Mon May 26, 2008 8:15 pm

Thursday morning.

Jinkers · #18 Postby **Jinkers** » Mon May 26, 2008 9:22 pm

I said thursday.

#19 Postby **Hybridstorm_November2001** » Tue May 27, 2008 6:47 am

I voted Friday, and beyond. Based upon all the data; I feel it will take a while for this one to get it's act together on the Atlantic side (at least 48 hr), if at all.

boca · #20 Postby **boca** » Tue May 27, 2008 6:51 am

90L will not be associated with this distubance.90e will be most likely.