Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
I have seen many questions wondering if the system SW of CV will become a major hurricane. I am here to ask people to not ask this type of question for the following reason: It downplays the category 1 and 2 hurricanes!
Last year, we had the 4th most destructive storm in US history, Ike. It was "only" a cat 2 at landfall. We also had Gustav which caused more than 4 billion in damage and it too was "only" a cat 2. Isabel, Georges, and Floyd were also "only" cat 2s at landfall, and each were multi-billion dollar disasters. New evidence suggests that many historical storms that were once thought to be major hurricanes (i.e. Audrey) likely were not.
The point is, any hurricane is dangerous. You can easily experience worse conditions in a cat 1 than you would in a cat 4. It all depends if you get the maximum winds and especially if you are unlucky and get caught in one of the mini-swirls in the eyewall.
To quote Eric Salna, "A hurricane is a hurricane, is a hurricane". Do not treat a hurricane lightly just because it is not "major" hurricane. If you do so, you could end up like those on Galveston during Ike.
Something to keep in mind as we see development of a potentially dangerous system this week-end
Last year, we had the 4th most destructive storm in US history, Ike. It was "only" a cat 2 at landfall. We also had Gustav which caused more than 4 billion in damage and it too was "only" a cat 2. Isabel, Georges, and Floyd were also "only" cat 2s at landfall, and each were multi-billion dollar disasters. New evidence suggests that many historical storms that were once thought to be major hurricanes (i.e. Audrey) likely were not.
The point is, any hurricane is dangerous. You can easily experience worse conditions in a cat 1 than you would in a cat 4. It all depends if you get the maximum winds and especially if you are unlucky and get caught in one of the mini-swirls in the eyewall.
To quote Eric Salna, "A hurricane is a hurricane, is a hurricane". Do not treat a hurricane lightly just because it is not "major" hurricane. If you do so, you could end up like those on Galveston during Ike.
Something to keep in mind as we see development of a potentially dangerous system this week-end
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
This is very true, esp for the Caribbean. I remember a certain system called Jeanne in 2004 which whilst a category-1 caused huge amount of life loss due to the rains. Also remember just how potent both Wilma and Katrina wre in Florida and both times we probably saw category-1 conditions, maybe at 2 in Wilma?
Last edited by KWT on Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- CourierPR
- Category 5
- Posts: 1335
- Age: 71
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Pompano Beach, Florida
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Point well taken. I remember that in '64, Cleo was not a major but it inflicted much damage in South FL. Wilma in 2005 is another example.
0 likes
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Point taken Derek. Those of us who have been on this site for years know this, but there will be a large amount of folks visiting here that will not.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145595
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
The Caribbean members here commend you on the statement.
0 likes
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Well said Derek! Ike was a scary moment for me.
Last edited by Ptarmigan on Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38099
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
This is a great post... you don't even need a hurricane for it to be a life-threatening storm. Water kills far more than wind.
0 likes
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Wow great post Derek! Many newcomers here in South Florida need to heed that advice.
0 likes
- knotimpaired
- Category 1
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:14 am
- Location: Vieques, PR
- Contact:
Re:
shah8 wrote:That being said, the most concerning thing about this storm is that it looks like it will actually be a large rainmaking type storm that can kill many people in hilly areas, and the Carribean is full of some reasonably tall places.
I would rather have rain than wind. We survived 33" on Vieques with Jeanne in a day and a half.
We have a Weatherhawk system that took care of the measuring.

0 likes
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Very intelligent post Mr. Derek, not only for people in US but people on the Caribbean and Central America. Mitch was not a major hurricane when it made landfall, Stan was a "weak" cat 1, Noel was a TS when it made landfall on Hispaniola. Certainly "minor" hurricanes can do major destruction.
0 likes
- Annie Oakley
- Category 5
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
- Location: Texas
Also living in the UK we do get sometimes quite big wind events which can have gusts upto 75-85mph generally. A lot of people won't really know just how powerful those winds can be. I've seen people here think the winds were gusting to about 70mph when infact they were only around 45, so its very easy to underestimate the strength of the wind as well.
0 likes
Re: Do NOT focus on if the system is a major hurricane
Derek Ortt wrote:I have seen many questions wondering if the system SW of CV will become a major hurricane. I am here to ask people to not ask this type of question for the following reason: It downplays the category 1 and 2 hurricanes!
Thank you for this excellent post. I think the point is further underscored by Allison in TX - "only" a tropical storm but what a disaster that was. Bad enough to get her name retired.
Categories are sustained windspeeds, only one measure of the storm - they have nothing to do with amount of rain & flooding, surge, tornados spawned, saturation of the ground prior to landfall, elevation of the area at landfall, all of which can affect the severity of the conditions.
just a side note: the hurricane that hit the Tampa Bay area (Tarpon actually) back in the 20's was said to be a major storm. But I've heard that old-timers disagree with the assessment.New evidence suggests that many historical storms that were once thought to be major hurricanes (i.e. Audrey) likely were not.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
- Contact:
Re:
KWT wrote:Also living in the UK we do get sometimes quite big wind events which can have gusts upto 75-85mph generally. A lot of people won't really know just how powerful those winds can be. I've seen people here think the winds were gusting to about 70mph when infact they were only around 45, so its very easy to underestimate the strength of the wind as well.
Agreed, 45mph gusts are pretty strong, 70mph gusts make a MESS. I remember a couple of years ago when we had that big windstorm, the winds were maybe 40 sustained, 65-70 gusts and that was bad enough. I can't imagine being in a 75mph hurricane.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ineedsnow, lilbump3000, Stratton23, WaveBreaking and 90 guests