Possible GOM/Caribbean development

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Possible GOM/Caribbean development

#1 Postby Ivanhater » Fri May 28, 2010 12:56 pm

Well the odds are low on this, but there is a chance that the energy from 90e may transport to the Caribbean.

The good ol 12z Canadian had an interesting run for Florida :double:

Image

Image
Last edited by Ivanhater on Sat May 29, 2010 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#2 Postby Aquawind » Fri May 28, 2010 1:01 pm

OH great the Canadians have gone back north and now wanna have the state vacuumed clean.. Let's hope it's just another one of the many CMC scarey but, bogus runs.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

#3 Postby thetruesms » Fri May 28, 2010 1:12 pm

Oh, CMC, you're such a hoot sometimes :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#4 Postby KWT » Fri May 28, 2010 2:42 pm

Can't totally rule it out but I'd be surprised if anything forms from whatever comes over from 90E. It'll probably lead to an increase in precip in the Caribbean and it may well be given invest status but we'll see, I'm not too convinced just yet.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22984
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#5 Postby wxman57 » Fri May 28, 2010 3:40 pm

I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#6 Postby gatorcane » Fri May 28, 2010 7:07 pm

wxman57 wrote:I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.


Wasn't the CMC upgraded last year sometime in the summer to address the bias towards developing everything?
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#7 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri May 28, 2010 8:56 pm

Looks like 18z GFS tracks 90E over into the SE GOM and develops a closed low.

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22984
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#8 Postby wxman57 » Sat May 29, 2010 8:54 am

gatorcane wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.


Wasn't the CMC upgraded last year sometime in the summer to address the bias towards developing everything?


It may have had some upgrades, but not to fix this problem.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#9 Postby thetruesms » Sat May 29, 2010 9:15 am

wxman57 wrote:I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.
I'm confused, where were you exaggerating in this post? Image

September seems like a weird time to be implementing a tropical-aimed upgrade. I suppose they're just behind schedule a bit?
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#10 Postby gatorcane » Sat May 29, 2010 9:32 am

wxman57 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.


Wasn't the CMC upgraded last year sometime in the summer to address the bias towards developing everything?


It may have had some upgrades, but not to fix this problem.


Okay thanks for the clarification.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: Possible GOM/Caribbean development

#11 Postby Ivanhater » Sat May 29, 2010 10:23 am

Image

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#12 Postby KWT » Sat May 29, 2010 10:35 am

Looks like convective feedback is what blows up the GFS low, big convective burst near NE Yucatan and within 12hrs a low has developed within the convection...

Whether or not it comes off, I'm not sure, the GFS has been hinting at it for a while but then again it doesn't always handle the Caribbean regions that well at this time of year.

I'd suspect perhaps a weak low may form but nothing will come from it, helped by the energy of Agatha.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#13 Postby HURAKAN » Sat May 29, 2010 1:15 pm

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#14 Postby KWT » Sat May 29, 2010 1:36 pm

Some models are pretty keen on at least developing some sort of closed low pressure. The 12z GFDL looks pretty much the same as the earlier run which takes the remains of Agatha up through the Yucatan.

ECM doesn't show anything developing from this system, I suspect whilst we will see convection increase in response in the Caribbean, not too sure we will see anything actually develop though.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22984
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#15 Postby wxman57 » Sat May 29, 2010 2:07 pm

thetruesms wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.
I'm confused, where were you exaggerating in this post? Image

September seems like a weird time to be implementing a tropical-aimed upgrade. I suppose they're just behind schedule a bit?


As the speaker said, the Canadian model wasn't designed to be a tropical model. However, they recognize that they do get impacted by such storms sometimes, so that is a concern. The model upgrade will not be finished and tested until September - at the earliest. There's no option for releasing the upgrade earlier. Chances are, September is an optimistic estimate. Besides, reducing false-alarm developments was only a part of the fixes being implemented.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: Possible Caribbean development

#16 Postby thetruesms » Sat May 29, 2010 2:27 pm

wxman57 wrote:
thetruesms wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I saw a presentation at the AMS hurricane conference in Tucson by one of the modelers for the Canadian model. He acknowledged that the Canadian model produces 1000-2000 false alarms of TC development per year (maybe I exaggerate a tiny bit). One goal in this year's upgrade is to reduce the model's tendency to develop every cumulus cloud in the tropics into a Cat 5 hurricane. However, this model upgrade isn't scheduled until September at the earliest.
I'm confused, where were you exaggerating in this post? Image

September seems like a weird time to be implementing a tropical-aimed upgrade. I suppose they're just behind schedule a bit?


As the speaker said, the Canadian model wasn't designed to be a tropical model. However, they recognize that they do get impacted by such storms sometimes, so that is a concern. The model upgrade will not be finished and tested until September - at the earliest. There's no option for releasing the upgrade earlier. Chances are, September is an optimistic estimate. Besides, reducing false-alarm developments was only a part of the fixes being implemented.
Ah, so it's just a part of a large package, rather than one focused on that issue? Okay, that makes more sense on the timing then. A little bit of a bummer, though - it seems like this time of year would be a good time to test that fix. There'll be plenty of opportunities to see how it works when they do get it ready, though.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#17 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat May 29, 2010 2:31 pm

The chances of this crossover are quite low right now...on the order of maybe 20% optimistically. A moderate tropical storm going over a mountain range known for killing tropical systems and increasing shear are both reasons I suspect this will not make it over the Yucatan. If anything comes from Agatha on the Atlantic side it will be completely new with the moisture from Agatha. The NHC is forecasting that westerly kink in the forecast, signifying to me that they may not even be looking at the possibility of a crossover. SST's near the Yucatan are high enough to support cyclogenesis, but shear is not.

I want to make a special point for this. SST's are only the fuel for hurricanes and other tropical cyclones. If you do not have a car to put fuel into, then you just have fuel. Your car must also have some sort of starter to use the fuel. In other words, you have to have a tropical wave or disturbance with some sort of a trigger to get the wave to use the higher SST's. If you did not need a trigger and a wave present for cyclogenesis, then you would see hundreds of cyclones each year.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#18 Postby KWT » Sat May 29, 2010 2:43 pm

Actually the models aren't that high with shear, the GFS only has about 10-15kts worth of shear in the Caribbean, which won't stop things from developing.

That being said I don't think anything will develop from the remains and as you rightly said there is no certainty they even make it to the Caribbean, I've not been too convinced about it making it to the Caribbean and instead may end up tracking the whole way up the Yucatan.

edit---also remember its not Agatha itself thats spawning the GFS/CMC low but a split piece of energy , Agatha itself will probably stay overland.
Last edited by KWT on Sat May 29, 2010 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#19 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sat May 29, 2010 2:54 pm

Looks like some of the moisture may get into the Caribbean (if it
even goes there) from agatha but any
circulation will have been dissipated by land interaction so I just think
it may just add moisture but not too much more.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#20 Postby KWT » Sat May 29, 2010 4:11 pm

Well from the sounds of things from the NHC the mid levels split from the lower levels and this is from the looks of things what the GFS and the CMC is latching onto. My main concern with this is convective feedback issues are the reason why the GFS is developing a low from this almost instantly.

I still don't rate the chances too highly, but the fact that a few models are showing this, at the time of year we are in and the fact that conditions aloft aren't too bad really, does make me a little curious!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JaviT and 21 guests