What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#1 Postby hurricaneCW » Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:12 pm

There have been many storms that have been retired over the years, but I know there are plenty of storms that wrecked havoc but were never retired. Can anyone think of a few storms that should have been retired, but weren't. This includes the Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific, any landfall, (Canada, Mexico, Central America, ext).
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#2 Postby Macrocane » Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:41 pm

Hurricane Francelia (1969), more than 100 people died in Central America but it was never retired.
Hurricane Gordon (1994), it caused more than 1100 deaths in Haiti.
Hurricane Hanna (2008), more than 500 people died in Haiti because of this hurricane.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#3 Postby Hurricanehink » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:26 pm

Juan 85 (caused $1.5 billion in damage in Louisiana and 24 deaths) - sure, it was retired in 2003, but I think it should've been retired its first time around. At the time, it was the 8th costliest US hurricane.
Alberto 94 (caused $1 billion in damage and 30 deaths) - really severe damage in Florida/Georgia. If it had happened after Allison, I'm sure it would've been retired, but I think because Alberto was a tropical storm, it wasn't properly considered.
Emily 05 (caused $988 million in damage, was a Cat. 5, heavy damage in Mexico) - Mexico focused on Stan and Wilma for retirement, but that doesn't mean Emily shouldn't have been retired.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#4 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Aug 15, 2010 3:58 pm

Agree with all of them above, especially Gordon and Hanna. Juan was pretty bad in 1985 and I don't know why it was not retired.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#5 Postby Cyclone1 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:59 pm

Agreed with the above. Also, the following have a case for retirement. (My standards for retirement may be a tad lower, because I think retirement is important) I may be overestimating a few, but just for the sake of argument.

For the Atlantic we have:
Hurricane Hilda (1955). Killed over 300 in Mexico, got retired later.
Hurricane Gracie (1959). This might have been retired, but no one really knows for sure. It definitely should have been, and was never used again, so.
Hurricane Alma (1966). I would have retired it. Notable damage, unusually early major hurricane.
Hurricane Edith (1971). Again, not much of a case, but I would have retired it for aesthetics mainly. Category 5 landfall, and all.
Tropical Storm Claudette (1979), one of those popular half-billion tropical storms. Extensive flood damage.
Hurricane Kate (1985) was a damaging hurricane and a record setting major hurricane in late November that hit Florida.
Tropical Storm Isabel (1985), very damaging flooding in Puerto Rico.
Hurricane Juan (1985), mentioned above. 1985 was a powerhouse season.
A case could be made for Hurricane Grace (1991), or maybe "Henri", which was never actually named. Talking of course about the Halloween Nor'easter "Perfect Storm".
Hurricane Gordon (1994) mentioned above. Really there is no excuse.
Hurricane Erin (1995), could have unarguably been retired.
Hurricane Bertha's (1996) damage was mixed in with and eclipsed by Fran's. I've often wondered if it would have been retired if Fran hadn't happened.
Hurricane Bonnie (1998): Actually fairly considerably damaging. Certainly puts this year's Bonnie to shame
Hurricane Irene (1999): Maybe. A retirement of this one wouldn't have been argued.
Hurricane Emily (2005): see above posts
Hurricane Ernesto (2006): just kidding.
Hurricane Hanna (2008): I honestly thought this WAS retired.
Tropical Storm Fay (2008): Flooded Melbourne out.

For the Pacific we have:

Hurricane Liza (1976). Not officially retired, despite heavy loss of life. They get a free pass though, because it was never used again.
Hurricane Paul (1982). Deadliest named storm in the basin, unretired because it was only a depression when it did it's damage.
Hurricane Tico (1983). Hundreds dead.
Hurricane Norbert (2008). Extensive damage, no retirement.

I would also be disappointed if Alex and Agatha are not retired next year. Both were highly damaging billion dollar storms. If Alma got retired in 2008, Agatha gets retired.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#6 Postby Macrocane » Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:12 pm

:uarrow: I agree with you about Agatha and Alex. Agatha was a record breaking storm in El Salvador and caused several floods in the country and it was very deadly in Guatemala. Alex has been one of the worst disasters in northeastern Mexico so it needs to be retired.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#7 Postby Florida1118 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:58 am

I Certainly agree with you about most of the storms. I dont know about Fay, but then again I wasnt in Melbourne so I really dont know the Extent of the flooding.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#8 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:26 pm

If all those names were retired, the lists today would look totally different...and even some later retired storms would have different names.
0 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#9 Postby HurricaneRyan » Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:24 pm

Hurricane Dolly of 2008: Ike pretty much overshadowed her though!
Hurricane Emily of 2005: Overshadowed by Wilma
Tropical Storm Lee of 2011: Overshadowed by Irene
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#10 Postby AJC3 » Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:01 pm

Using Haiti as a benchmark for retirement of a TC name is somewhat problematic for several reasons. The island is so, so succeptible to catastropic losses from even the most milquetoast tropical entity for several reasons, including...

1) Overpopulation and extreme poverty
2) Havng an almost completely denuded topography, resulting in the lack of ablity for any agrarian economic contributiion of significance, and also resulting in a country obscenely prone to flash flooding and mudslides,
3) Unstable governmental infrastructure incapable of dealing with warning dissemination, protection, and disaster response.

Couple that with the country sitting pretty close to climatological bullseye of TC track swaths and you have a ready-made recipe for calamity.

IIRC, about 6-12 years ago, there was a strong Caribbean tropical wave that unleashed torrents of rain on the nation over the course of a few days, resulting in devastating flash floods that claimed hundreds of lives.

Obviously, other nations (e.g. many CENTAM countries) are also more succeptible than others to TC impacts, however, Haiti is a very, very extreme case of several unfortunate factors coming together.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#11 Postby Hammy » Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:17 pm

Karl from 2010 should have been retired as it caused ~$5.6 billion in damages to Mexico
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re:

#12 Postby Cyclenall » Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:29 pm

AJC3 wrote:Obviously, other nations (e.g. many CENTAM countries) are also more succeptible than others to TC impacts, however, Haiti is a very, very extreme case of several unfortunate factors coming together.

Something I just thought of, what was the deadliest tropical cyclone to ever hit Haiti? It seems like a obvious question but I can't think of it.

The biggest TC name for me that should have been retired ages ago is Emily!!!
0 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re:

#13 Postby HurricaneRyan » Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:13 am

Hammy wrote:Karl from 2010 should have been retired as it caused ~$5.6 billion in damages to Mexico
Actually I read that it was only did like 200 million or so.
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: Re:

#14 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:36 am

Cyclenall wrote: Something I just thought of, what was the deadliest tropical cyclone to ever hit Haiti? It seems like a obvious question but I can't think of it.

The biggest TC name for me that should have been retired ages ago is Emily!!!


Hurricane Flora killed at least 5000 in Haiti in 1963.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

#15 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:45 am

Typhoon Fengshen (2008) should have been retired.

All models were forecasting recurvature over the open Pacific. Instead, Fengshen trekked across the Philippines.

Claimed nearly 1400 lives in the Philippines, including more than 800 on a ship that sank during the storm.

At the time, it was the costliest typhoon in the Philippines. It has since been surpassed by Parma (2009) and Nesat (2011).
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: Re:

#16 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:15 am

HurricaneRyan wrote:
Hammy wrote:Karl from 2010 should have been retired as it caused ~$5.6 billion in damages to Mexico
Actually I read that it was only did like 200 million or so.


Nope. "Damage $5.6 billion (2010 USD)"

From the EPAC, I would have retired
Hurricane Tara (1961) 436-500 dead, but only 16 mil in damage
Hurricane Birdigt (1971)-Like Tara, one of Acapulco's worst hurricanes, fewer death, but more damage
Hurricane Olivia (1975)-costly storm, 30 dead, one of Mazaltan worst systems
Hurricane Kathleen (1976)-10 dead, 2 missing, $160 mil in damage, Octillo's worst flood ever
Hurricane Liza (1976)-killed anywhere from 650 to 7,000, likely Baja California's worst system
Hurricane Norman (1978)-California's costliest TC, killed several people
Tropical Storm Lidia (1981)-73 dead, 81 mil in damage in Sinaloa
Tropical Storm Aletta (1982)-308 dead, 547 mil in damage, one of Nicaragua worst systems
Hurricane Paul (1982)-1,696 dead, 668 missing, $1.56 billion in damage, was only a TD when it did most of its damage, but was El Salvador worst disaster in 17 years
Hurricane Tico (1983)-record flooding in Texas/Oklahoma, one of Mazaltan;s worst systems 141 deaths (mostly from Mexico), 284 mil in damage
Hurricane Odile (1984)-40 dead, hundreds missing, similar to Bridget and Tara
Tropical Storm Beatriz (1993)-Technically a billion dollar storm combined with Arlene 93
Hurricane Linda (1997)-only because of it's intensity
Hurricane Nora (1997)-similar to Kathleen
Tropical Storm Erick (2007)-just kidding
Hurricane Norbert (2008)-700+ mil in damage and 24 deaths should do it
Hurricane Jimena (2009)-similar to Norbert, but did less deaths and damage.
Tropical Storm Agatha (2010)-billion dollar storm
0 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: Re:

#17 Postby HurricaneRyan » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:13 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:
HurricaneRyan wrote:
Hammy wrote:Karl from 2010 should have been retired as it caused ~$5.6 billion in damages to Mexico
Actually I read that it was only did like 200 million or so.


Nope. "Damage $5.6 billion (2010 USD)"

From the EPAC, I would have retired
Hurricane Tara (1961) 436-500 dead, but only 16 mil in damage
Hurricane Birdigt (1971)-Like Tara, one of Acapulco's worst hurricanes, fewer death, but more damage
Hurricane Olivia (1975)-costly storm, 30 dead, one of Mazaltan worst systems
Hurricane Kathleen (1976)-10 dead, 2 missing, $160 mil in damage, Octillo's worst flood ever
Hurricane Liza (1976)-killed anywhere from 650 to 7,000, likely Baja California's worst system
Hurricane Norman (1978)-California's costliest TC, killed several people
Tropical Storm Lidia (1981)-73 dead, 81 mil in damage in Sinaloa
Tropical Storm Aletta (1982)-308 dead, 547 mil in damage, one of Nicaragua worst systems
Hurricane Paul (1982)-1,696 dead, 668 missing, $1.56 billion in damage, was only a TD when it did most of its damage, but was El Salvador worst disaster in 17 years
Hurricane Tico (1983)-record flooding in Texas/Oklahoma, one of Mazaltan;s worst systems 141 deaths (mostly from Mexico), 284 mil in damage
Hurricane Odile (1984)-40 dead, hundreds missing, similar to Bridget and Tara
Tropical Storm Beatriz (1993)-Technically a billion dollar storm combined with Arlene 93
Hurricane Linda (1997)-only because of it's intensity
Hurricane Nora (1997)-similar to Kathleen
Tropical Storm Erick (2007)-just kidding
Hurricane Norbert (2008)-700+ mil in damage and 24 deaths should do it
Hurricane Jimena (2009)-similar to Norbert, but did less deaths and damage.
Tropical Storm Agatha (2010)-billion dollar storm


You read that from Wikipedia didn't you? Karl definitely Did not do that much damage.
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Re:

#18 Postby Cyclenall » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:40 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:
Cyclenall wrote: Something I just thought of, what was the deadliest tropical cyclone to ever hit Haiti? It seems like a obvious question but I can't think of it.

The biggest TC name for me that should have been retired ages ago is Emily!!!


Hurricane Flora killed at least 5000 in Haiti in 1963.

Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: Re:

#19 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:20 pm

HurricaneRyan wrote:
You read that from Wikipedia didn't you? Karl definitely Did not do that much damage.


What makes you think that?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#20 Postby senorpepr » Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:17 am

What Storms Should Have Been Retired?

None.

Honestly, I feel we over-retire names today. Sure, the Katrinas and Andrews... whatever. But frankly, naming storms and retiring them seems a bit excessive here lately.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cheezyWXguy, riapal and 40 guests