NHC discussion at 5 pm in full (deserves own thread)-SCARY!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
rob8303
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:20 pm
Location: Montrose, B.C, Canada
Contact:

NHC discussion at 5 pm in full (deserves own thread)-SCARY!

#1 Postby rob8303 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:45 pm

VERY Scary. I haven't seen a discussion from NHC like this EVER:

THE ALLEGED EYE OF ISABEL PASSED OVER BUOY 13008 LOCATED AT 15N 38W
BETWEEN 14-15Z. THE BUOY REPORTED 37 KT AND 24 KT NORTHEAST WINDS
...TO THE SOUTH OF ALL THE SATELLITE CENTER POSITIONS. THESE WIND
REPORTS SUGGEST THAT THE ACTUAL CENTER IS FARTHER SOUTH NEAR THE
SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE EYE FEATURE...AS MENTIONED IN THE PREVIOUS
DISCUSSION. DURING THE PAST 6 HOURS...THE EYE FEATURE...OVERALL
CONVECTIVE PATTERN...AND OUTFLOW PATTERN HAVE CONTINUED TO IMPROVE.
THE INITIAL INTENSITY OF 70 KT IS BASED ON SATELLITE INTENSITY
ESTIMATES OF 65 KT FROM TAFB AND SAB...AND 77 KT FROM AFWA.

THE INITIAL MOTION ESTIMATE IS 295/13. THE INITIAL POSITION REMAINS
ABOUT 24 NMI SOUTH OF THE SATELLITE POSITIONS. THE 12Z GLOBAL
MODELS ARE IN EVEN BETTER AGREEMENT NOW ON KEEPING AT LEAST A
MODERATE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE NORTH OF ISABEL ALONG 32N LATITUDE
THROUGHOUT THE FORECAST PERIOD...AND EVEN BUILD IT WESTWARD ACROSS
THE BAHAMAS AND FLORIDA. THIS SHOULD KEEP ISABEL MOVING
WEST-NORTHWESTWARD THROUGH 48-72 HOURS...WITH A GRADUAL WESTWARD
MOTION DEVELOPING AFTER THAT. THE PREVIOUS FORECAST TRACK WAS ONLY
SHIFTED SLIGHTLY NORTHWARD AND SLOWED A LITTLE AFTER 72 HOURS...
WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GLOBAL MODEL CONSENSUS.

ISABEL CURRENTLY HAS A VERY IMPRESSIVE OUTFLOW PATTERN AND...
UNFORTUNATELY...THE GLOBAL MODELS ARE FORECASTING IT TO BECOME EVEN
BETTER. BY 36-48 HOURS... ALL OF THE GLOBAL MODELS EXCEPT THE UKMET
ARE FORECASTING MORE THAN 50 KT OF OUTFLOW ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ISABEL BEING DRAWN INTO AN UPPER-LEVEL LOW LOCATED JUST NORTHEAST
OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS. A PATTERN LIKE THAT CAN OFTENTIMES LEAD TO
RAPID OR EXPLOSIVE DEEPENING. THE SHIPS INTENSITY MODEL BRINGS
ISABEL UP TO 97 KT IN 60 HOURS...BUT THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A
LITTLE HIGHER SINCE SHIPS WAS LOW/SLOW WITH THE INTENSIFICATION OF
FABIAN. THE INTENSITY WAS LEVELED OFF AFTER 48 HOURS SINCE ISABEL
MAY CROSS A POSSIBLE COLD WAKE LEFT BEHIND BY HURRICANE FABIAN.

FORECASTER STEWART

FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INITIAL 07/2100Z 15.2N 39.1W 70 KT
12HR VT 08/0600Z 15.8N 40.5W 75 KT
24HR VT 08/1800Z 16.5N 42.8W 85 KT
36HR VT 09/0600Z 17.2N 45.2W 95 KT
48HR VT 09/1800Z 18.0N 47.7W 100 KT
72HR VT 10/1800Z 19.0N 52.0W 100 KT
96HR VT 11/1800Z 19.5N 55.5W 100 KT
120HR VT 12/1800Z 19.5N 60.0W 100 KT
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#2 Postby PTrackerLA » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:47 pm

That doesn't sound good for the US, this one has me worried.
0 likes   

rob8303
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:20 pm
Location: Montrose, B.C, Canada
Contact:

#3 Postby rob8303 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:49 pm

Indeed :cry: me too
0 likes   

User avatar
charleston_hugo_veteran
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 pm
Location: Charleston, S.C.

#4 Postby charleston_hugo_veteran » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:50 pm

Time to get the hurricane check list out! :(
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#5 Postby weatherlover427 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:52 pm

Uh oh ... not good at all! I especially don't like these parts:

DURING THE PAST 6 HOURS...THE EYE FEATURE...OVERALL CONVECTIVE PATTERN...AND OUTFLOW PATTERN HAVE CONTINUED TO IMPROVE.


THE 12Z GLOBAL MODELS ARE IN EVEN BETTER AGREEMENT NOW ON KEEPING AT LEAST A
MODERATE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE NORTH OF ISABEL ALONG 32N LATITUDE THROUGHOUT THE FORECAST PERIOD...AND EVEN BUILD IT WESTWARD ACROSS THE BAHAMAS AND FLORIDA.


ISABEL CURRENTLY HAS A VERY IMPRESSIVE OUTFLOW PATTERN AND...UNFORTUNATELY...THE GLOBAL MODELS ARE FORECASTING IT TO BECOME EVEN BETTER.

BY 36-48 HOURS... ALL OF THE GLOBAL MODELS EXCEPT THE UKMET ARE FORECASTING MORE THAN 50 KT OF OUTFLOW ON THE WEST SIDE OF ISABEL BEING DRAWN INTO AN UPPER-LEVEL LOW LOCATED JUST NORTHEAST OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS.

and the worst one IMO (along with the second one) ...

A PATTERN LIKE THAT CAN OFTENTIMES LEAD TO RAPID OR EXPLOSIVE DEEPENING.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#6 Postby Stormsfury » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:53 pm

Isabel when the storm becomes a little more properly stacked has every oppotunity to become a major ... this line is quite frightening indeed.

ISABEL CURRENTLY HAS A VERY IMPRESSIVE OUTFLOW PATTERN AND...
UNFORTUNATELY...THE GLOBAL MODELS ARE FORECASTING IT TO BECOME EVEN
BETTER. BY 36-48 HOURS... ALL OF THE GLOBAL MODELS EXCEPT THE UKMET
ARE FORECASTING MORE THAN 50 KT OF OUTFLOW ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ISABEL BEING DRAWN INTO AN UPPER-LEVEL LOW LOCATED JUST NORTHEAST
OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS. A PATTERN LIKE THAT CAN OFTENTIMES LEAD TO
RAPID OR EXPLOSIVE DEEPENING.
THE SHIPS INTENSITY MODEL BRINGS
ISABEL UP TO 97 KT IN 60 HOURS...BUT THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A
LITTLE HIGHER SINCE SHIPS WAS LOW/SLOW WITH THE INTENSIFICATION OF
FABIAN. THE INTENSITY WAS LEVELED OFF AFTER 48 HOURS SINCE ISABEL
MAY CROSS A POSSIBLE COLD WAKE LEFT BEHIND BY HURRICANE FABIAN.
0 likes   

User avatar
charleston_hugo_veteran
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 pm
Location: Charleston, S.C.

#7 Postby charleston_hugo_veteran » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:55 pm

Let's face it, nothing in this paragraph is good! :cry: Let's hope it changes for everyones sake!
0 likes   

Renata
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Holetown, Barbados

I love the language

#8 Postby Renata » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:56 pm

Alleged eye.

If the hurricane specialists are alleging then yes ... we ought to be scared.

The "allegation" raises some questions, presumptions, and comments:

(1) We are not dealing with a hurricane but a very mature-looking storm, therefore the eye position is correct;

(2) We are dealing with a hurricane and given that tropical storm force winds extend outward to 90 miles, then it stands to reason that the buoy was was measuring the winds on the outter NE limit and that would put the eye somewhere 1.5 degrees SW of the "alleged" position - so we're talking somewhere in the vicinity of 14.5N 40W

(3) There is no closed circulation and the NW quad is open ... remember an earlier discussion about dry air coming in from the SW and NE?

Comments??
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#9 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:57 pm

Lets not get too agitated yet. That discussion came from the most bullish of the forecasters at NHC. I have seen much more urgent than that one.

Also, remember, anything past 3 days is merely an outlook due to the high error margins. So, it is well too early to get into a panick or anything about a possible US landfall
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#10 Postby Thunder44 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:59 pm

I think it is safe to say that Isabel will be a major hurricane. This is time to start talking about another Andrew, Camile, or Hugo.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#11 Postby Lindaloo » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:00 pm

Camille?
0 likes   

Josephine96

#12 Postby Josephine96 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:02 pm

Isabel is 1 mean lady.. I think what's left of Fabian and Henri as well as future "Juan" perhaps should all be scared. Not telling what will happen if 1 of them pisses her off
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#13 Postby dixiebreeze » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:02 pm

I'm not panicking Derek, but "explosive deepening" is a term I've not heard before in an NHC discussion this early in development. :o Won't be taking my eyes off Isabel.
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#14 Postby weatherlover427 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:05 pm

After all, she only has 80 MPH winds. 100 kt = 115 MPH, barely a cat 3. I think she could go a LOT higher since they indicated explosive deepening. Looks like she has a lot going for her.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#15 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:09 pm

However, what was not mentioned in that discussion is the fact that ALL guidance weakens the system slightly after 72 hours, probably due to increasing shear and a less favorable CAPE and theta-e
0 likes   

rob8303
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:20 pm
Location: Montrose, B.C, Canada
Contact:

#16 Postby rob8303 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:10 pm

Derek, you mentioned that Stewart is very bullish. Does this include track as well? Intensity doesn't matter if this storm just swims with the fishes but is Stewart usually predicting CONUS landfalls and is his talk about the ridging correct or is that bullish too? BTW, I know he didn't predict CONUS landfall. I just asked if he's made that mistake in the past.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#17 Postby Stormsfury » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:17 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:However, what was not mentioned in that discussion is the fact that ALL guidance weakens the system slightly after 72 hours, probably due to increasing shear and a less favorable CAPE and theta-e


Part of that is from the NHC forecast track takes Isabel over the cool wake left behind from Fabian ...

SF
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#18 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:17 pm

He is often the farthest west and is the most aggressive in terms of intensity. There is a slight bias towards stronger systems hitting land areas with him than there are from some of the other forecasters
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#19 Postby Thunder44 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:19 pm

I think he's just tell how he sees it. I also think he consulted with his colleages there before he wrote this advisory. The computer models are unreliable when it comes to intensity of Tropical Cyclones. He's always more specific, not necessarily bullish, but in his details on tropical systems than anybody there. This storm will probably become a major hurricane before 72 hours anyway. And yes Lindloo, this could be a "Camile" if it winds in the GOM.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#20 Postby wx247 » Sun Sep 07, 2003 4:21 pm

Stormsfury wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:However, what was not mentioned in that discussion is the fact that ALL guidance weakens the system slightly after 72 hours, probably due to increasing shear and a less favorable CAPE and theta-e


Part of that is from the NHC forecast track takes Isabel over the cool wake left behind from Fabian ...

SF


How long could Isabel be in this area of cooler waters?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, Killjoy12, MSN [Bot], StormWeather and 70 guests