JETMAXX-URGENT QUESTION FOR YOU
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:20 pm
- Location: Montrose, B.C, Canada
- Contact:
JETMAXX-URGENT QUESTION FOR YOU
JETMAXX, I just had a thought. If this storm does rapidly deepen and the evacuation orders aren't as extensive as they should have been, we're in for some deep trouble, aren't we? IS THERE STILL TIME FOR EVACS?
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
I think Rob brings up a good point.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
I agree Rainband, but remember it is the local officials that make the evacuation decisions.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Once hurricane warnings are issued at 11 p.m., a lot of vunerable locations will begin evacuations...but the facts are you CANNOT drag families from their homes and apartments and throw them in jail..
NHC needs to be proactive and reinterate to the public that Isabel is LIKELY to be a major hurricane at landfall...possibly 125 mph or more.
NHC needs to be proactive and reinterate to the public that Isabel is LIKELY to be a major hurricane at landfall...possibly 125 mph or more.
0 likes
I know here in Central Florida, a lot of the main coastal roads are closed when winds reach a certain speed.. I remember from both Erin and Floyd that once winds hit a certain speed, the drawbridges get locked and they order the roads shut..
They do the same with the public buses here.. when winds reach a certain speed.. they stop running..
Does anybody living in these areas have anything similar..? Just wondering out of curiosity..
They do the same with the public buses here.. when winds reach a certain speed.. they stop running..
Does anybody living in these areas have anything similar..? Just wondering out of curiosity..
0 likes
I'd like to have confidence that the message is getting out that this might be a major hurricane--- but I don't.
Not because of the NWS or the local emergency management offices-- but because most people get their information from The Weather Channel. And I don't know how many times I've wanted to strangle those bozos for giving out the impression that it's now "only" not quite a Category Three. The words "only" and "hurricane" do not belong in the same sentence.
AFAIK, almost every intensity forecast for the last week put it around a cat. 3 at landfall (ie, no one was expecting it to stay a Cat. 5). Nobody credible was ever afraid it would hit land as a Cat. 5. Everyone has been concerned about it hitting just the wrong places as a Cat. 3, and it might still do that.
I wonder if, next spring, The Weather Channel will be reassuring residents of the Midwest not to worry, that that tornado plowing towards them is "only" an F-2, maybe an F-3, and not one of those really bad F-5s
(Of course they're not all bozos at TWC. But there's enough bozoness among the pretend mets to mislead plenty of people.)
Not because of the NWS or the local emergency management offices-- but because most people get their information from The Weather Channel. And I don't know how many times I've wanted to strangle those bozos for giving out the impression that it's now "only" not quite a Category Three. The words "only" and "hurricane" do not belong in the same sentence.
AFAIK, almost every intensity forecast for the last week put it around a cat. 3 at landfall (ie, no one was expecting it to stay a Cat. 5). Nobody credible was ever afraid it would hit land as a Cat. 5. Everyone has been concerned about it hitting just the wrong places as a Cat. 3, and it might still do that.
I wonder if, next spring, The Weather Channel will be reassuring residents of the Midwest not to worry, that that tornado plowing towards them is "only" an F-2, maybe an F-3, and not one of those really bad F-5s

(Of course they're not all bozos at TWC. But there's enough bozoness among the pretend mets to mislead plenty of people.)
0 likes
Themusk I can tell you first hand the way things are being stated from the TV weather reports they are having an affect on how some people are reacting. My husband works for a vacation type resort and some of the people vacationing there were saying today they were gonna stick around because they were hearing on the TV reports its ONLY a cat 2 now. Its a big problem because many of these people have no idea of what they are in for.
0 likes
My posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just ramblings of an old Grandma who loves tropical storms, and are not backed by any type of sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I'm catching some flack for forecasting a strong cat-3 at landfall....but there is that possibility....even DT is now saying "moderate cat-3" (i.e.- 120-125 mph)
I've also recieved two emails this evening....one from a veteran tv chief meteorologist & former NWS meteorologist and the other from a retired NHC forecaster, and both said I'm on the beam....there is a decent chance this hurricane could deepen to 130 mph before landfall.
Remember....hurricane Hazel occurred in MID-OCTOBER and was a 135 mph (938mb) cat-4 in the Wilmington/ Myrtle Beach area. Even though 1954 was a very hot summer in the southeast, there's no way the sst's offshore were any warmer on October 15th than they are right now (and Hugo occurred later in September than this also).
I've also recieved two emails this evening....one from a veteran tv chief meteorologist & former NWS meteorologist and the other from a retired NHC forecaster, and both said I'm on the beam....there is a decent chance this hurricane could deepen to 130 mph before landfall.
Remember....hurricane Hazel occurred in MID-OCTOBER and was a 135 mph (938mb) cat-4 in the Wilmington/ Myrtle Beach area. Even though 1954 was a very hot summer in the southeast, there's no way the sst's offshore were any warmer on October 15th than they are right now (and Hugo occurred later in September than this also).
0 likes
I'm Impressed So Far
I'm impressed with your accuracy so far JETMAXX! Still a bit nervous here on the east coast of VA though...worst case scenario would bring it in on the forcast tracks further east as shown yesterday. Fortunately everything looks like it's shifting west...just wondering what your best guess at the chances that the eye will cross EAST of Richmond versus WEST of Richmond? :?
0 likes
Debbie, the model data indicates a track from near Ocracoke to Roanoke Rapids, NC....then to just west of Richmond.....which is bad news for Richmond, but honestly very good news for Norfolk and Virginia Beach...as well as the Delmarva Peninsula --they'll get hurricane force winds in greater Norfolk IMO, but missing the core will mean the difference in 125-150 mph gusts and 75-100....and thus much less damage.
I don't expect 90 mph sustained winds in Richmond....those winds will be over Chesapeake Bay (over the water)....I look for sustained winds in Richmond of 50-70 mph with gusts of 75-90...possibly 100 IF Isabel is as strong as I believe at landfall..
If I'm overestimating the intensity (i.e.- if NHC is right about 110 mph at landfall)....the winds in Richmond and Norfolk will be much lower....probably gusts of 70-85 mph in Norfolk and 50-60 in Richmond....or like a severe thunderstorm.
I don't expect 90 mph sustained winds in Richmond....those winds will be over Chesapeake Bay (over the water)....I look for sustained winds in Richmond of 50-70 mph with gusts of 75-90...possibly 100 IF Isabel is as strong as I believe at landfall..
If I'm overestimating the intensity (i.e.- if NHC is right about 110 mph at landfall)....the winds in Richmond and Norfolk will be much lower....probably gusts of 70-85 mph in Norfolk and 50-60 in Richmond....or like a severe thunderstorm.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: gib and 45 guests