http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/WATL/IR4/20.jpg
What happened to 97L?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Josephine96
-
Air Force Met
- Military Met

- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
No, it moving too fast is still shear.....
Actually the speed issue doesn't seem to be all that material either. It would have LOOKED like classical-getting-the-top ripped off.
It actually entered a very complex col, and the issues with convection seem to be more convergence-divergence related than shear.
And it DID slow down markedly. It actually lost its convection when it slowed down.
Actually the speed issue doesn't seem to be all that material either. It would have LOOKED like classical-getting-the-top ripped off.
It actually entered a very complex col, and the issues with convection seem to be more convergence-divergence related than shear.
And it DID slow down markedly. It actually lost its convection when it slowed down.
0 likes
-
Anonymous
was the dry air !
It was the dry air, according to the tropical outlook via Accu Weather. After the wave weakened, the dry air decreased some, so the two cancelled each other out................
0 likes
- stormchazer
- Category 5

- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
- Location: Lakeland, Florida
- Contact:
I agree kenl....the wave entered a pocket of dry, sinking air and it killed it. I thought if the circulation survived, it might re-fire this morning, but even that seems to have been killed.
0 likes
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Opinions my own.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Opinions my own.
-
rbaker
97L
I believe the flare ups were associated with the ull when it was close to the ull, but in true fashion would wane out in afternoon and evenings. In fact llooking at sat. pictures the western side of flare ups had no inflow, and the east side always looked sheared. Now that the wave has gone futher west from the ull, there is no affect from it. Now its strong easterly shear. In fact as I was dissusing with stormchaser 16, winds were blowing in two different directions very close to the thunderstorms, just south of main convection west winds, and to the north east winds.
0 likes
-
Anonymous
Rbaker is correct...the shear was the main reason this ever had convection while in the E Caribbean. The ULL to the N induced strong shear, which in turn lead to divergence aloft over 97L. The end result...more lift and more convection. The situation was good for convection but terrible for true tropical organization.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests



