Since Charlie is farther to the south than expected.... most of the local mets say because of that, and that it slowed down, it will turn north SOONER and make landfall farther south/east.
Another arguement is that since it's south and west of what was predicted.... that it will make landfall farther north/west than what's predicted.
Opinions? I dont know who/what to believe :-P
~Chris
Which Arguement is Correct?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
chris_fit
- Category 5
- Posts: 3261
- Age: 42
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Which Arguement is Correct?
0 likes
-
Guest
-
ColdFront77
It doesn't sound like this: Information from a Live NWS Melbourne, FL Broadcast
.....include take the relocation and in at least some regard, more importantly the slowdown from 24 mph at 5 AM and 8 AM Eastern to 18 mph at 11 AM, although the broadcast was after the 11:00 AM Advisory was in.
.....include take the relocation and in at least some regard, more importantly the slowdown from 24 mph at 5 AM and 8 AM Eastern to 18 mph at 11 AM, although the broadcast was after the 11:00 AM Advisory was in.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Team Ghost and 57 guests