I've been deleted..

DESTRUCTION5 · #1 Postby **DESTRUCTION5** » Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:28 am

Ok people I was not out to bash anyone..I was just trying to prove a point on climatoligy. All I can say at this point is everyone is right..Its not over till its over...But i know living in Tequesta FL i feel a whole lot better than I did this weekend.

chadtm80 · #2 Postby **chadtm80** » Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:30 am

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:Ok people I was not out to bash anyone..I was just trying to prove a point on climatoligy. All I can say at this point is everyone is right..Its not over till its over...But i know living in Tequesta FL i feel a whole lot better than I did this weekend.

Yes you were.. Check your PM's

weatherFrEaK · #3 Postby **weatherFrEaK** » Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:46 am

People don't like opposing opinions and forecasts too much here. Many are thread nazis...just ignore them. Look at ncweatherwizard and the flak he is taking for maintaining his SC/NC/GA forecast from the get go. At least he is not changing his forecast based on public forum opinion and now even the NHC is trending towards that scenario.

mf_dolphin · #4 Postby **mf_dolphin** » Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:02 am

The thread Nazi's as you put it in this case were the owners. The problem we had with the thread in question is that it spoke in absolutes which when we're this far out is just not prudent. There will be plenty of time to crow or eat crow after Frances is safely out of our hair. Climatology is great for understanding patterns and history but does nothing as far as predicting a current storm's track. Climatology would have said that Andrew would have recurved but it didn't. Climatology would have said that Charley wouldn't get pulled NE by a trough in August. Let's all look at the data and see what's happening before we start guaranteeing where a storm will or won't be....

x-y-no · #5 Postby **x-y-no** » Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:45 am

mf_dolphin wrote:The thread Nazi's as you put it in this case were the owners. The problem we had with the thread in question is that it spoke in absolutes which when we're this far out is just not prudent. There will be plenty of time to crow or eat crow after Frances is safely out of our hair. Climatology is great for understanding patterns and history but does nothing as far as predicting a current storm's track. Climatology would have said that Andrew would have recurved but it didn't. Climatology would have said that Charley wouldn't get pulled NE by a trough in August. Let's all look at the data and see what's happening before we start guaranteeing where a storm will or won't be....

Thanks. You stated that more succinctly and clearly than I seemed to be able to do in that thead.

#6 Postby **joseph01** » Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:50 am

I wouldn't call them thread nazis, but I have also noticed what I thought were moderators/owners with an extra helping of zeal.

I've been deleted..

I've been deleted..

Re: I've been deleted..

Who is online