Doesn't appear to be a due N movement

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

Doesn't appear to be a due N movement

#1 Postby HollynLA » Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:55 am

If you look at the radar since this morning, this is some westerly motion to the N movement, more like NNWN. I've not really seen a due N movement except for a N wobble. It may not seem like much but it is since it's so close to land. I'm thinking a Pascagoula, MS landfall rather than Mobile. Anyone else agree?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-vis-loop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Cape Verde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 564
Age: 70
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: Houston area

#2 Postby Cape Verde » Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:56 am

I don't know about landfall, but I agree Ivan isn't moving due north yet.
0 likes   

AlabamaDave
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:44 pm

Re: Doesn't appear to be a due N movement

#3 Postby AlabamaDave » Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:57 am

HollynLA wrote:If you look at the radar since this morning, this is some westerly motion to the N movement, more like NNWN. I've not really seen a due N movement except for a N wobble. It may not seem like much but it is since it's so close to land. I'm thinking a Pascagoula, MS landfall rather than Mobile. Anyone else agree?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-vis-loop.html


The eye is so large, it seems like a Pascagoula landfall would also essentially be a Mobile Landfall! :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#4 Postby x-y-no » Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:58 am

"NNWN"?

There actually is a proper term for this direction - it's "north by west."
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Doesn't appear to be a due N movement

#5 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:59 am

HollynLA wrote:If you look at the radar since this morning, this is some westerly motion to the N movement, more like NNWN. I've not really seen a due N movement except for a N wobble. It may not seem like much but it is since it's so close to land. I'm thinking a Pascagoula, MS landfall rather than Mobile. Anyone else agree?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-vis-loop.html


I Agree Holly. BTW... Love your new compass direction (NNWN)!!
0 likes   

B-Bear
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:43 am

#6 Postby B-Bear » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:01 pm

It does look like it's about 350, which is about where they've been calling it. The thing is, that IS just west of due north, and if it doesn't make the right shift they are expecting prior to landfall, N.O. may get more than what they're planning on right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
BayouVenteux
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 775
Age: 64
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)

Re: Doesn't appear to be a due N movement

#7 Postby BayouVenteux » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:02 pm

HollynLA wrote:If you look at the radar since this morning, this is some westerly motion to the N movement, more like NNWN. I've not really seen a due N movement except for a N wobble. It may not seem like much but it is since it's so close to land. I'm thinking a Pascagoula, MS landfall rather than Mobile. Anyone else agree?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-vis-loop.html
I'm not sure about the exact final point at which it will cross the coast Holly, but from what I have read on the Mobile NWS website, it will make a substantial difference in the storm surge impact...and the chances of even greater catastrophe...in the north end of Mobile Bay:

THE CENTER OF IVAN IS EXPECTED TO TRACK OVER MOBILE BAY TONIGHT. THIS WILL CAUSE A STORM SURGE OF 8 TO 10 FEET...AT A MINIMUM.
HOWEVER...IF IVAN'S TRACK WERE TO SHIFT EVEN SLIGHTLY FURTHER TO THE WEST...(SAY OVER MOBILE COUNTY)...THE STORM SURGE COULD BE IN THE 16 TO 18 FEET IN THE NORTH END OF THE BAY. THE LATTER FIGURE INCLUDES THE FACT THAT TIDES ARE CURRENTLY RUNNING BETWEEN 1 AND 2 FEET ABOVE NORMAL. ALSO GIVEN THE CURRENT TRACK...THE FORT MORGAN PENINSULA ...GULF SHORES AND ORANGE BEACH WILL SHARE IN THE 8 TO 10 FEET SURGE GIVEN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE TO THE EAST OF THE TRACK.
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#8 Postby HollynLA » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:02 pm

"NNWN"?

There actually is a proper term for this direction - it's "north by west


Sorry but I think most know what I mean. :lol:
Last edited by HollynLA on Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#9 Postby opera ghost » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:03 pm

I see it as well. Don't know what it means- but I see it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#10 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:04 pm

HollynLA wrote:
"NNWN"?

There actually is a proper term for this direction - it's "north by west


Sorry but I think most know what I mean.


Just funnin' with 'ya... Yes, we know.
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#11 Postby HollynLA » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:05 pm

BayouV, I sure hope most residents in Mobile have left. Is there anyone here from Mobile who decided to stay. I sure hope I'm wrong about lanfall for Mobile's sake. :cry:
0 likes   

JMGNole
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Tallahassee

#12 Postby JMGNole » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:10 pm

I was just looking at the doppler and noticed that it was a bit left of due north.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/radar/loop/DS.p20-r/si.klix.shtml
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#13 Postby HollynLA » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:17 pm

I'm very curious to see if the NHC lists the movement as due N at the 1pm CDT advisory. If so, I just won't understand.
0 likes   

Lockhart
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:34 am
Location: Miami, FL

#14 Postby Lockhart » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:20 pm

If you look at the forecast points, Ivan is *right* where they have forecast. So, if you are worried he isn't doing what they thought he'd do, don't worry yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
FritzPaul
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 468
Age: 58
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 7:09 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL
Contact:

#15 Postby FritzPaul » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:21 pm

350 motion would still be N in the NHC's eyes.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#16 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:25 pm

Looks like near Pascagoula or maybe the MS/AL border to me. I ran a SLOSH model for a Cat 4 hurricane hitting just west of Mobile and got a surge of 10-13 feet on Dauphin Island and 18.5 feet in northern Mobile Bay.

I also reworked the wind radii based upon numerous observations and accounting for frictional reduction to the west and came up with the 60 mph wind radius on the extreme east side of New Orleans. So a track toward Pascagoula would mean 50-60 mph wind in New Orleans (east side). They'll be just on the outer part of the CDO.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#17 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:26 pm

FritzPaul wrote:350 motion would still be N in the NHC's eyes.


Yep, there are 16 compass directions with 22 1/2 deg for each heading. So just over 11 degrees either side of 360 = north.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#18 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:28 pm

FritzPaul wrote:350 motion would still be N in the NHC's eyes.


Way offshore, I believe that would make good sense. However, maybe that wouldn't be so sensible closer in where 10, or 15, or 20 miles can make a big difference.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

#19 Postby pojo » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:30 pm

There has been some toggling over the past couple of days, but Ivans movement is somewhat staying on a Northerly pattern. In Tropical Wx, toggling is common.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#20 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:32 pm

wxman57 wrote:
FritzPaul wrote:350 motion would still be N in the NHC's eyes.


Yep, there are 16 compass directions with 22 1/2 deg for each heading. So just over 11 degrees either side of 360 = north.


Very Interesting - Thans!!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JtSmarts and 51 guests