11 PM DISCUSSION... A tad weird IMO... but read...

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

11 PM DISCUSSION... A tad weird IMO... but read...

#1 Postby yoda » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:01 pm

Hurricane Jeanne Discussion Number 50


Statement as of 11:00 PM EDT on September 25, 2004


The eye is moving onshore over Martin and St. Lucie counties. On
radar over the past couple of hours...an inner eyewall was observed
to dissipate. Jeanne has a large 40 N mi diameter eye...with a
large radius of maximum winds...about 45 N mi. The eyewall
replacement probably played a role in preventing any additional
strengthening of the hurricane. In fact...sfmr and flight level
wind observations at this point do not quite support the 100 kt
intensity estimate...however the aircraft has not yet finished its
survey of the Hurricane.
Jeanne has been moving mostly westward over the past few hours...and
is still expected to make a gradual turn to the right as it moves
around the western periphery of a deep-layer high pressure system.
The current NHC track forecast is a little to the left and slightly
slower than that from the previous advisory. Late in the forecast
period...Jeanne should be accelerating in the westerlies and losing
tropical characteristics to the south and southeast of the Canadian
Maritimes. This forecast lies between the dynamical consensus and
the GFS track.
The Vero Beach fcmp tower just reported sustained winds of 75 mph
with a gust to 104 mph.
Winds of hurricane force could occur as far as 100 miles inland
along the track of Jeanne.
Forecaster Pasch

forecast positions and Max winds

initial 26/0300z 27.2n 80.0w 100 kt
12hr VT 26/1200z 28.0n 81.5w 65 kt...inland
24hr VT 27/0000z 29.2n 82.9w 45 kt...inland
36hr VT 27/1200z 31.0n 83.5w 30 kt...inland
48hr VT 28/0000z 33.0n 83.0w 25 kt...inland
72hr VT 29/0000z 38.0n 75.5w 30 kt...inland
96hr VT 30/0000z 42.0n 65.0w 40 kt...becoming extratropical
120hr VT 01/0000z 45.0n 54.0w 50 kt...extratropical

$$
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#2 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:03 pm

What are you finding that is weird?
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#3 Postby yoda » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:06 pm

senorpepr wrote:What are you finding that is weird?


This part:

In fact...sfmr and flight level
wind observations at this point do not quite support the 100 kt
intensity estimate...however the aircraft has not yet finished its
survey of the Hurricane.


If so... wouldn't this mean that they had upgraded prematurely? Or would this mean its a CAT 2 at landfall is the aircraft agrees with what the SFMR and the flight level winds say?
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

#4 Postby Cookiely » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:06 pm

Don't you find it strange that he didn't mention GA,SC but went straight to the Canadian maritimes.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#5 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:08 pm

yoda wrote:
senorpepr wrote:What are you finding that is weird?


This part:

In fact...sfmr and flight level
wind observations at this point do not quite support the 100 kt
intensity estimate...however the aircraft has not yet finished its
survey of the Hurricane.


If so... wouldn't this mean that they had upgraded prematurely? Or would this mean its a CAT 2 at landfall is the aircraft agrees with what the SFMR and the flight level winds say?


No, if I'm not mistaken, recon confirmed the cat 3 status earlier. However, it appears as if Jeanne weakened slightly to cat 2 status before landfall. Radar also confirmed this as the eye weakened a bit.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#6 Postby yoda » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:09 pm

senorpepr wrote:
yoda wrote:
senorpepr wrote:What are you finding that is weird?


This part:

In fact...sfmr and flight level
wind observations at this point do not quite support the 100 kt
intensity estimate...however the aircraft has not yet finished its
survey of the Hurricane.


If so... wouldn't this mean that they had upgraded prematurely? Or would this mean its a CAT 2 at landfall is the aircraft agrees with what the SFMR and the flight level winds say?


Ah.. ok. So this MAY, MAY suggest that Jeanne made landfall as a CAT 2?

No, if I'm not mistaken, recon confirmed the cat 3 status earlier. However, it appears as if Jeanne weakened slightly to cat 2 status before landfall. Radar also confirmed this as the eye weakened a bit.
0 likes   

Guest

#7 Postby Guest » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:10 pm

yes....recon measured 108kts 2 different times...was definitely a cat 3 at one point, weakened to cat 2 before landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#8 Postby bahamaswx » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:11 pm

Jeanne hasn't made landfall yet :)
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#9 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:11 pm

yoda wrote:Ah.. ok. So this MAY, MAY suggest that Jeanne made landfall as a CAT 2?


Possibly.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#10 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:12 pm

bahamaswx wrote:Jeanne hasn't made landfall yet :)


Actually, it has along the barrier islands.
Last edited by senorpepr on Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#11 Postby yoda » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:13 pm

So are we agreeing FOR NOW that Jeanne made landfall as a CAT 2?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#12 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:14 pm

yoda wrote:So are we agreeing FOR NOW that Jeanne made landfall as a CAT 2?


In my opinion, it was cat 2 simply based on what recon had been reporting and what the new data shown. Unless I see data that proves otherwise, I'm standing by cat 2 when it struck the barrier islands.
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#13 Postby bahamaswx » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:16 pm

senorpepr wrote:
bahamaswx wrote:Jeanne hasn't made landfall yet :)


Actually, it has along the barrier islands.


I thought landfall was the center of the eye? Unless these barrier islands are much further away from the mainland than I'm figuring...
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#14 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:20 pm

bahamaswx wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
bahamaswx wrote:Jeanne hasn't made landfall yet :)


Actually, it has along the barrier islands.


I thought landfall was the center of the eye? Unless these barrier islands are much further away from the mainland than I'm figuring...


Well, you could look at it either way. However, the eye is making landfall. Since part of the eye has made landfall, landfall has occurred. On the other hand, the vortex of the storm -- the centroid of the eye -- has not made landfall.
0 likes   

Indystorm
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Kentland Indiana

#15 Postby Indystorm » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:24 pm

Landfall is when the center of the eye touches shore......not when the eyewall reaches shore. Correct
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#16 Postby weatherlover427 » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:47 pm

yoda wrote:
senorpepr wrote:What are you finding that is weird?


This part:

In fact...sfmr and flight level
wind observations at this point do not quite support the 100 kt
intensity estimate...however the aircraft has not yet finished its survey of the Hurricane.


If so... wouldn't this mean that they had upgraded prematurely? Or would this mean its a CAT 2 at landfall is the aircraft agrees with what the SFMR and the flight level winds say?


Read the part I highlighted.
0 likes   

Guest

#17 Postby Guest » Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:53 pm

It was a CAT 3 at landfall.

Max Mayfield said that the NOAA jet found 115 mph winds N of the center a short time ago.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost, Torgo and 39 guests