Dr Gray October Update
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Dr Gray October Update
Here it is...read all the way through as there is some very good info on the Florida hurricane problem this season:
Summary: 3 Oct Named Storms, 2 Hurricanes, 0 Majors
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/oct2004/
MW
Summary: 3 Oct Named Storms, 2 Hurricanes, 0 Majors
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/oct2004/
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
- Stormsfury
- Category 5

- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
-
hibiscushouse
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 152
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:17 pm
- Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Fl
- Galvestongirl
- Category 1

- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:13 am
-
Scorpion
-
SouthernWx
I respect Dr Gray, but must respectfully disagree with his assessment.....in forecasting no major hurricanes in October or November.
I only have to cite the past nine seasons (1995-2003)....when major hurricanes were spawned in 7 of 9 AFTER October 1st; including category 4/5 hurricanes such as Mitch, Iris, Keith, Lenny, and Michelle....as a source of concern.
True, historically, the U.S. has never been impacted by more than three major hurricanes in one season, nor the Florida peninsula more than two...but that doesn't mean is cannot or will not occur.
Both the Caribbean Sea and Bay of Campeche are still extremely warm and posess plenty of fuel (TCHP) to produce another severe hurricane or two. There's no way of knowing, even if they develop if a U.S. landfall will occur at peak intensity....but I wouldn't rule it out, nor ignore the possibility based on Dr Gray's report. As a coastal resident, that would be both unwise and dangerous.
In addition, I've stated since early August that this season's overall pattern reminded me of 1964....the unusually strong troughs for so early in the season, the landfall of a significant hurricane into Florida before August 15th...an event never before observed. In 1964, the Florida peninsula was struck by an early strong hurricane (Cleo). After Dora in September, two additional major hurricanes developed in October 1964.....Hilda, which blasted Louisiana with 120+ mph winds...and later Isbell, which impacted Florida from near Key West to Everglades City and West Palm Beach as a cat-2 hurricane.
I honestly won't be surprised if another strong to severe hurricane impacts southern Florida between now and November. Jeanne was the first landfalling major September hurricane on the Florida peninsula since Betsy....39 years ago. The last major hurricane to impact the peninsula in October was King in 1950. The return period for a major October hurricane in peninsular Florida was once every ten (10) years between 1846 and 1950.....and we've now gone 53 seasons since the last one.
The way this unusual, record breaking season has gone thus far....I'd keep my eyes peeled to the south and southwest if I lived along the U.S. coast...especially if I lived in Florida....just in case my theories are correct and Dr Gray's aren't.
I only have to cite the past nine seasons (1995-2003)....when major hurricanes were spawned in 7 of 9 AFTER October 1st; including category 4/5 hurricanes such as Mitch, Iris, Keith, Lenny, and Michelle....as a source of concern.
True, historically, the U.S. has never been impacted by more than three major hurricanes in one season, nor the Florida peninsula more than two...but that doesn't mean is cannot or will not occur.
Both the Caribbean Sea and Bay of Campeche are still extremely warm and posess plenty of fuel (TCHP) to produce another severe hurricane or two. There's no way of knowing, even if they develop if a U.S. landfall will occur at peak intensity....but I wouldn't rule it out, nor ignore the possibility based on Dr Gray's report. As a coastal resident, that would be both unwise and dangerous.
In addition, I've stated since early August that this season's overall pattern reminded me of 1964....the unusually strong troughs for so early in the season, the landfall of a significant hurricane into Florida before August 15th...an event never before observed. In 1964, the Florida peninsula was struck by an early strong hurricane (Cleo). After Dora in September, two additional major hurricanes developed in October 1964.....Hilda, which blasted Louisiana with 120+ mph winds...and later Isbell, which impacted Florida from near Key West to Everglades City and West Palm Beach as a cat-2 hurricane.
I honestly won't be surprised if another strong to severe hurricane impacts southern Florida between now and November. Jeanne was the first landfalling major September hurricane on the Florida peninsula since Betsy....39 years ago. The last major hurricane to impact the peninsula in October was King in 1950. The return period for a major October hurricane in peninsular Florida was once every ten (10) years between 1846 and 1950.....and we've now gone 53 seasons since the last one.
The way this unusual, record breaking season has gone thus far....I'd keep my eyes peeled to the south and southwest if I lived along the U.S. coast...especially if I lived in Florida....just in case my theories are correct and Dr Gray's aren't.
0 likes
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Dr Gray October Update
For those who might be starting to think about the coming winter, Dr. Gray's report is revealing in that it notes, "Long period records indicate that active hurricane seasons almost never occur with such high positive values of Atlantic SLPA or when such high anomalous values of sea surface temperature are present in NINO 3.4 (August-September 2004 values were +0.8°C)."
Since 1950 when regular reporting of the global indices has been available, there were two hurricane seasons that saw 10 or more named storms when Region 3.4 had an average temperature at or above 27.5°C (anomaly at or above +0.6°C) for the May-November period:
For now, as food for thought, I'll only note that these two years have popped up on other occasions in discussions of possible analogs for Winter 2004-05.
Since 1950 when regular reporting of the global indices has been available, there were two hurricane seasons that saw 10 or more named storms when Region 3.4 had an average temperature at or above 27.5°C (anomaly at or above +0.6°C) for the May-November period:
Code: Select all
Year R3.4 Temp. R3.4 Anom.Named Storms
1969 27.60°C + 0.64°C 17
2002 28.07°C + 1.10°C 12
2004 27.76°C + 0.50°C 12
For now, as food for thought, I'll only note that these two years have popped up on other occasions in discussions of possible analogs for Winter 2004-05.
0 likes
-
hibiscushouse
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 152
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:17 pm
- Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Fl
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Sorry, Hibiscushouse.
I should have posted this in the "Winter" folder. Briefly, when one is looking to make a seasonal forecast, one relies on a number of factors ranging from computer models to analogs. Analogs are past years that had similar characteristics to the current one, with the idea that such past years might offer some insight into the coming season. At this point in time, the computer guidance alone is not really sufficient for seasonal forecasting.
Analogs proved very helpful in assessing that the 2004 Hurricane Season would be an active one. When one considered such factors as the Multivariate ENSO Index in ranges that were similar to what was expected for 2004, among others, 13-13 past seasons saw 11 or more named storms.
What Dr. Gray noted was a highly unusual situation with water temperature anomalies in a specific location in the Pacific Ocean. In virtually all such years with that characteristic, hurricane seasons were relatively quiet. An active season with that characteristic present has occurred only twice since 1950 when the global indices were regularly reported.
As for Winter 2004-05, at this point in time, there are a number of possible analogs (one can find some discussions of this in the "Winter" folder). This observation by Dr. Gray, if one pursued it further, lent some credence to two that are in the running at the moment. Some reasonable similarities:
1969-70: Weak El Niño, QBO* switched to East, Active hurricane season preceded it, + PDO, etc.
2002-03: Moderate El Niño, QBO switched to East, Active hurricane season preceded it, + PDO etc.
2004-05: Expected: Weak El Niño, QBO switch to East, Follows active hurricane season, + PDO
*-Over the past 12 months (September 2003-August 2004), the QBO has been most similar to that in the September 1968-August 1969 period.
Key:
QBO: Quasi-Biennial Oscillation
PDO: Pacific Decadal Oscillation
I should have posted this in the "Winter" folder. Briefly, when one is looking to make a seasonal forecast, one relies on a number of factors ranging from computer models to analogs. Analogs are past years that had similar characteristics to the current one, with the idea that such past years might offer some insight into the coming season. At this point in time, the computer guidance alone is not really sufficient for seasonal forecasting.
Analogs proved very helpful in assessing that the 2004 Hurricane Season would be an active one. When one considered such factors as the Multivariate ENSO Index in ranges that were similar to what was expected for 2004, among others, 13-13 past seasons saw 11 or more named storms.
What Dr. Gray noted was a highly unusual situation with water temperature anomalies in a specific location in the Pacific Ocean. In virtually all such years with that characteristic, hurricane seasons were relatively quiet. An active season with that characteristic present has occurred only twice since 1950 when the global indices were regularly reported.
As for Winter 2004-05, at this point in time, there are a number of possible analogs (one can find some discussions of this in the "Winter" folder). This observation by Dr. Gray, if one pursued it further, lent some credence to two that are in the running at the moment. Some reasonable similarities:
1969-70: Weak El Niño, QBO* switched to East, Active hurricane season preceded it, + PDO, etc.
2002-03: Moderate El Niño, QBO switched to East, Active hurricane season preceded it, + PDO etc.
2004-05: Expected: Weak El Niño, QBO switch to East, Follows active hurricane season, + PDO
*-Over the past 12 months (September 2003-August 2004), the QBO has been most similar to that in the September 1968-August 1969 period.
Key:
QBO: Quasi-Biennial Oscillation
PDO: Pacific Decadal Oscillation
0 likes
-
WeatherEmperor
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 4806
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: South Florida
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: gib, jhpigott, MetroMike, Sciencerocks and 328 guests


