12:00z Model Guidance,Grafic=A Shift east,Ship 113 kts

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148503
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

12:00z Model Guidance,Grafic=A Shift east,Ship 113 kts

#1 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:38 am

Image

[/img] NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

HURRICANE DENNIS (AL042005) ON 20050707 1200 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
050707 1200 050708 0000 050708 1200 050709 0000

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 17.6N 75.0W 19.3N 77.2W 21.0N 79.3W 22.7N 81.2W
BAMM 17.6N 75.0W 19.7N 77.3W 21.6N 79.6W 23.3N 81.6W
A98E 17.6N 75.0W 19.1N 77.0W 20.8N 78.8W 22.9N 80.5W
LBAR 17.6N 75.0W 19.2N 77.3W 20.9N 79.5W 22.6N 81.3W
SHIP 90KTS 97KTS 104KTS 111KTS
DSHP 90KTS 97KTS 104KTS 84KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
050709 1200 050710 1200 050711 1200 050712 1200

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 24.4N 82.7W 28.7N 85.4W 34.1N 87.2W 37.8N 87.6W
BAMM 25.0N 83.4W 28.5N 86.4W 32.4N 87.9W 36.0N 87.2W
A98E 25.5N 82.0W 29.7N 84.3W 34.9N 85.3W 36.8N 85.4W
LBAR 24.3N 82.8W 27.4N 85.0W 31.2N 86.3W 35.6N 84.9W
SHIP 113KTS 107KTS 91KTS 66KTS
DSHP 94KTS 88KTS 39KTS 28KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 17.6N LONCUR = 75.0W DIRCUR = 305DEG SPDCUR = 12KT
LATM12 = 16.3N LONM12 = 73.1W DIRM12 = 296DEG SPDM12 = 12KT
LATM24 = 15.1N LONM24 = 70.9W
WNDCUR = 90KT RMAXWD = 15NM WNDM12 = 75KT
CENPRS = 968MB OUTPRS = 1010MB OUTRAD = 200NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 120NM RD34SE = 90NM RD34SW = 75NM RD34NW = 75NM



0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3261
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

#2 Postby chris_fit » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:39 am

So not cool
0 likes   

EarthStormFire

#3 Postby EarthStormFire » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:43 am

Guess this means NOLA is now safe. UKMET is the lone outlier in its insistance that NOLA will be pumeled.
0 likes   

tampastorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:22 pm
Location: TAMPA

#4 Postby tampastorm » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:44 am

now safe?! Are being serious, or just making fun how fast the models change?
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#5 Postby HollynLA » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:45 am

Guess this means NOLA is now safe


You're kidding right? Never make a comment like that when we're still 4 days out, there are people that will take it seriously. Models are shifting like they always do and no one, especially NOLA, should be considered "safe". No place on the northern gulf coast is able to classified as safe yet.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#6 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:46 am

EarthStormFire wrote:Guess this means NOLA is now safe. UKMET is the lone outlier in its insistance that NOLA will be pumeled.

You are crazy for thinking NOLA is safe. This is a change that is expected and not a surprise, the models will likely shift back west.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#7 Postby WeatherEmperor » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:47 am

Im just waiting to hear what the NHC has to say about this apparent slightly easterly trend.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#8 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:47 am

exactly, they will be back and forth almost every, not a good idea to think someone is safe on one run
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#9 Postby mobilebay » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:49 am

jkt21787 wrote:
EarthStormFire wrote:Guess this means NOLA is now safe. UKMET is the lone outlier in its insistance that NOLA will be pumeled.

You are crazy for thinking NOLA is safe. This is a change that is expected and not a surprise, the models will likely shift back west.

I agree. Those models are all off the GFS (except UKMET), really only one model shifted East, the GFS. wait until 12 Z run folks. Those models are using data from 7PM last night.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148503
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#10 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:53 am

To far away to make a bold statement about ANY area in the Gulf coast even Texas because you never know what factors can make this giant cyclone move as it can create it's own enviroment and in the tropics surprises are very common.What we have to follow is where the eye tracks hopefully it goes thru the more taller mountains in easterncentral Cuba part of that island and weakens it bigtime.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

EarthStormFire

#11 Postby EarthStormFire » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:54 am

mobilebay wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
EarthStormFire wrote:Guess this means NOLA is now safe. UKMET is the lone outlier in its insistance that NOLA will be pumeled.

You are crazy for thinking NOLA is safe. This is a change that is expected and not a surprise, the models will likely shift back west.

I agree. Those models are all off the GFS (except UKMET), really only one model shifted East, the GFS. wait until 12 Z run folks. Those models are using data from 7PM last night.


So all of the models but the UKMET are based off a single model the GFS. So if the GFS is way off then these would be way off too?
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#12 Postby mobilebay » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:55 am

EarthStormFire wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
EarthStormFire wrote:Guess this means NOLA is now safe. UKMET is the lone outlier in its insistance that NOLA will be pumeled.

You are crazy for thinking NOLA is safe. This is a change that is expected and not a surprise, the models will likely shift back west.

I agree. Those models are all off the GFS (except UKMET), really only one model shifted East, the GFS. wait until 12 Z run folks. Those models are using data from 7PM last night.


So all of the models but the UKMET are based off a single model the GFS. So if the GFS is way off then these would be way off too?

correct :D
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#13 Postby Brent » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:03 am

I don't like those runs. :eek: We do NOT need anymore rain here, much less wind.
0 likes   
#neversummer

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#14 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:05 am

It's good news for N.O. that the trend continues to be eastward and not westward but I would NOT let my guard down
for one second until Dennis is on shore. IMO
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#15 Postby dixiebreeze » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:07 am

Not at all surprised. Expect models to cluster even farther east eventually. This is getting downright scary.
0 likes   

tracyswfla
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 792
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 1:19 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

#16 Postby tracyswfla » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:08 am

dixiebreeze wrote:Not at all surprised. Expect models to cluster even farther east eventually. This is getting downright scary.


It is getting scarier with each model run.
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3261
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

#17 Postby chris_fit » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:12 am

Can we get some PRO METS opinions on the sudden shift, fairly large, shift to the right?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#18 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:14 am

its a very small right shift. 40 miles is NOT even close to a large shift
Last edited by Derek Ortt on Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#19 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:14 am

chris_fit wrote:Can we get some PRO METS opinions on the sudden shift, fairly large, shift to the right?

I agree as well, since I don't know what I'm talking about :lol: :wink:

Seriously, if this thing does hit FL, it won't come in as a major given all I'm seeing and reading elsewhere. Hopefully that makes people feel a little better.
0 likes   

User avatar
jdray
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 10:07 pm
Location: NE Florida

#20 Postby jdray » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:15 am

The CMC (you can call it Bunk if you want) and the NOGAPS have really been the ones with the same paths model after model.


The others are west then right quite a bit.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 340 guests