As look as we have Sal no development
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
As look as we have Sal no development
According to Derek he posted that as look as SAL is present these waves won't develop and he knows this type of senario well.
0 likes
- cinlfla
- Category 2

- Posts: 687
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast
According to Derek he posted that as look as SAL is present these waves won't develop and he knows this type of senario well.
Then whats the point in even putting up an invest and doing model plots if nothing will come out of these waves? Seems like a waste of time if Sal puts a halt to anything developing.
0 likes
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
cinlfla wrote:According to Derek he posted that as look as SAL is present these waves won't develop and he knows this type of senario well.
Then whats the point in even putting up an invest and doing model plots if nothing will come out of these waves? Seems like a waste of time if Sal puts a halt to anything developing.
Thank you. I think I'll stick with what the NHC has to say. If they say there is a possibility then that's what I will believe. No offense to the Mets on this board but hey these guys at the NHC are in the positions they are in because they are the best.
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
The area of dry air ahead of Invest-92 appears to be eroding. Compare the latest analysis:
with what it was like 24 hours earlier:
At this rate, it seems to me that conditions will be OK for development in another day or at most two.
I freely admit that Derek knows far, far more than I do on this topic, however.
Jan
with what it was like 24 hours earlier:
At this rate, it seems to me that conditions will be OK for development in another day or at most two.
I freely admit that Derek knows far, far more than I do on this topic, however.
Jan
0 likes
- cinlfla
- Category 2

- Posts: 687
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast
When they put up an invest I would assume its because of the possibilities. I personally listen to them because I figure they are the experts but I don't recall them saying anything about the Sal hindering development at this time. I may be wrong dunno, but my Question was never answered, if no develpment then why the invest? Oh I just wanted to mention I listen to them not for what I want to hear but to get information for tracking purposes because I do enjoy Hurricane season.
0 likes
- bvigal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2276
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
- Contact:
for those still asking: SAL = Saharan Air Layer = African dust
Hmmm, well I'd really like to discuss this issue, arugments aside, so I can learn something... OK guys?
I had a question about the SAL map, it looks as if Pacific is all dust, too. Is that correct, or can other conditions cause the red color, i.e. is all red SAL??? Or can I look at that map and incorrectly assume something is dust that really isn't?
And let's talk about layers of the atmosphere. Here, below 6,000ft. we are seeing clearing. I know that because every day I look my windows and there is an island, St. Thomas, which takes up 1/3 of my horizon view!! Today I can see it again.
But, how much dust is there as we go up from sea level? How low must dust be, what layer, to put the lid on development? To illustrate, with a wild extreme, does dust at 50,000ft. clamp development? (I know that answer
)
Finally, let's talk about distance. A broad circulation like 92L can certainly pull in dust from hundreds of miles away, right? Can anyone show us a static visible sat pic this morning and indicate where dust is traveling and at what levels?
Thanks for any and all attempts to increase my knowledge!
By the way, if anyone is interested in health/environment issues related to dust, here are a few interesting links:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Dust/
http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/african_dust/
Hmmm, well I'd really like to discuss this issue, arugments aside, so I can learn something... OK guys?
I had a question about the SAL map, it looks as if Pacific is all dust, too. Is that correct, or can other conditions cause the red color, i.e. is all red SAL??? Or can I look at that map and incorrectly assume something is dust that really isn't?
And let's talk about layers of the atmosphere. Here, below 6,000ft. we are seeing clearing. I know that because every day I look my windows and there is an island, St. Thomas, which takes up 1/3 of my horizon view!! Today I can see it again.
But, how much dust is there as we go up from sea level? How low must dust be, what layer, to put the lid on development? To illustrate, with a wild extreme, does dust at 50,000ft. clamp development? (I know that answer
Finally, let's talk about distance. A broad circulation like 92L can certainly pull in dust from hundreds of miles away, right? Can anyone show us a static visible sat pic this morning and indicate where dust is traveling and at what levels?
Thanks for any and all attempts to increase my knowledge!
By the way, if anyone is interested in health/environment issues related to dust, here are a few interesting links:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Dust/
http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/african_dust/
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
-
Derek Ortt
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
cinlfla wrote:When they put up an invest I would assume its because of the possibilities. I personally listen to them because I figure they are the experts but I don't recall them saying anything about the Sal hindering development at this time. I may be wrong dunno, but my Question was never answered, if no develpment then why the invest? Oh I just wanted to mention I listen to them not for what I want to hear but to get information for tracking purposes because I do enjoy Hurricane season.
That's is exactly how I feel and if it offended anyone well I'm sorry. If the NHC felt it was going to prevent development or was an issue then they would state it in the their outlooks. I have nothing else to say concerning SAL.
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Derek Ortt wrote:first one still seems to be over taken.
the one behind it could have some slow and milited development, but the chances are that both could develop once they clear 60W, or move north of 20N, where the SAL grip is less. A good example of that is Andrew
OK, but that's a little different than what I understood you to be saying in the other thread, where you said they're "done."
I absolutely agree there's no prospect of development until these systems get out of this environment. It just seems to me that may happen for the lead system within the next two days, and for the following system maybe a day later.
Jan
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
- bvigal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2276
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
- Contact:
for Derek
Derek, can you answer any of my questions?
bvigal wrote:for those still asking: SAL = Saharan Air Layer = African dust
Hmmm, well I'd really like to discuss this issue, arugments aside, so I can learn something... OK guys?
I had a question about the SAL map, it looks as if Pacific is all dust, too. Is that correct, or can other conditions cause the red color, i.e. is all red SAL??? Or can I look at that map and incorrectly assume something is dust that really isn't?
And let's talk about layers of the atmosphere. Here, below 6,000ft. we are seeing clearing. I know that because every day I look my windows and there is an island, St. Thomas, which takes up 1/3 of my horizon view!! Today I can see it again.
But, how much dust is there as we go up from sea level? How low must dust be, what layer, to put the lid on development? To illustrate, with a wild extreme, does dust at 50,000ft. clamp development? (I know that answer)
Finally, let's talk about distance. A broad circulation like 92L can certainly pull in dust from hundreds of miles away, right? Can anyone show us a static visible sat pic this morning and indicate where dust is traveling and at what levels?
Thanks for any and all attempts to increase my knowledge!
By the way, if anyone is interested in health/environment issues related to dust, here are a few interesting links:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Dust/
http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/african_dust/
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Derek Ortt wrote:the second one ahs the better chance. The first one looks as if it is under the sal. I do not recall a storm that was this entwined with the SAL to recover
It does look like the dry air is completely over the center. It sure would be extraordinary for this system to recover from that.
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
on that map, all dry air shows up the same as it is a combo product with 2 different satellite wavelengths.
From looking at GPS dropsondes, the SAL is between 2 and 5KM above the surface. You likely won't experience much drier conditions at the surface
yes, dust can be entrained into the center from far away. However, in a peper I am hoping to soon have published, I have found that this seems to happen typially in conjunction with shear
From looking at GPS dropsondes, the SAL is between 2 and 5KM above the surface. You likely won't experience much drier conditions at the surface
yes, dust can be entrained into the center from far away. However, in a peper I am hoping to soon have published, I have found that this seems to happen typially in conjunction with shear
0 likes
- bvigal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2276
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
- Contact:
Derek Ortt wrote:on that map, all dry air shows up the same as it is a combo product with 2 different satellite wavelengths.
From looking at GPS dropsondes, the SAL is between 2 and 5KM above the surface. You likely won't experience much drier conditions at the surface
yes, dust can be entrained into the center from far away. However, in a peper I am hoping to soon have published, I have found that this seems to happen typially in conjunction with shear
Thank you!
0 likes
- mf_dolphin
- Category 5

- Posts: 17758
- Age: 69
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
- Location: St Petersburg, FL
- Contact:
-
Derek Ortt
Derek Ortt wrote:first one still seems to be over taken.
the one behind it could have some slow and milited development, but the chances are that both could develop once they clear 60W, or move north of 20N, where the SAL grip is less. A good example of that is Andrew
Looking at those images of the SAL posted above, I'd say that the area above 20N has a much stronger SAL than the tropical regions to the south (the orange dust layer is mostly confined above 20N)...unless I am reading those maps completely wrong.
--Lou
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: cheezyWXguy, hurricanes1234 and 330 guests


