
GFDL predicts invest21l to be 163 mph in 120h an pressure 91
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
truballer#1
GFDL predicts invest21l to be 163 mph in 120h an pressure 91
Im not saying its going to happen but something to watch


0 likes
-
GalvestonDuck
- Category 5

- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
- Hyperstorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
truballer,
Don't be misled by the forecast wind speed which is at a level of a 950mb. You need to convert those winds to the surface. In this case, the system is forecast to be a Category 4 hurricane during that time with winds of 140-145 mph at the surface.
This is an extreme output and should be viewed as such...
Don't be misled by the forecast wind speed which is at a level of a 950mb. You need to convert those winds to the surface. In this case, the system is forecast to be a Category 4 hurricane during that time with winds of 140-145 mph at the surface.
This is an extreme output and should be viewed as such...
0 likes
-
Scorpion
- wxwatcher91
- Category 5

- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Keene, NH
- Contact:
Scorpion wrote:917 mb and 140 mph? While its possible(Katrina) it seems a little skeptical for a strengthening system.
not 140mph... 142kts and at 950mb... considering the eyewall would have pressures in the 920s to 930s in a 917mb cane, winds would be 142 x 1.15 = 163.3mph at 950mph... but because 950mb wouldnt be possible considering a 917mb storm... winds would be like 170 according to the model...
oh and just to make things clear- I'm only doing the math and in no way does this say anything about my opinion of the model forecast.
0 likes
-
truballer#1
- Hyperstorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
wxwatcher91 wrote:Scorpion wrote:917 mb and 140 mph? While its possible(Katrina) it seems a little skeptical for a strengthening system.
not 140mph... 142kts and at 950mb... considering the eyewall would have pressures in the 920s to 930s in a 917mb cane, winds would be 142 x 1.15 = 163.3mph at 950mph... but because 950mb wouldnt be possible considering a 917mb storm... winds would be like 170 according to the model...
oh and just to make things clear- I'm only doing the math and in no way does this say anything about my opinion of the model forecast.
wxwatcher,
950 mb is a LEVEL of the atmosphere, it is not the pressure of the storm.
Everyone needs to always convert the GFDL forecast winds to the surface (from 950 mb) at approximately 85% of those Flight-Level winds.
0 likes
- wxwatcher91
- Category 5

- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Keene, NH
- Contact:
Hyperstorm wrote:wxwatcher91 wrote:Scorpion wrote:917 mb and 140 mph? While its possible(Katrina) it seems a little skeptical for a strengthening system.
not 140mph... 142kts and at 950mb... considering the eyewall would have pressures in the 920s to 930s in a 917mb cane, winds would be 142 x 1.15 = 163.3mph at 950mph... but because 950mb wouldnt be possible considering a 917mb storm... winds would be like 170 according to the model...
oh and just to make things clear- I'm only doing the math and in no way does this say anything about my opinion of the model forecast.
wxwatcher,
950 mb is a LEVEL of the atmosphere, it is not the pressure of the storm.
Everyone needs to always convert the GFDL forecast winds to the surface (from 950 mb) at approximately 85% of those Flight-Level winds.
yeah I know but there wouldnt be a 950mb level in this case would there? because since pressures are lower than 950 at the surface and they only lower from there... there wouldnt be a 950 level...
sorry if I'm screwing this up... somebody want to help me out on this? lol
0 likes
-
Anonymous
- AussieMark
- Category 5

- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
- Location: near Sydney, Australia
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148497
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Let's not forget that the GFDL was the only model that forecasted the SW track of Katrina thru South Florida.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- P.K.
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 5149
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
- Location: Watford, England
- Contact:
truballer#1 wrote:gfdl isnt the only one hinting a strong hurricane
The Met Office model is picking up on 92L and taking it to a similar location http://moe.met.fsu.edu/tcgengifs//ukm/2005090112//slp24.png. On the model guidance this is down under the strong category so it isn't developing it quite as much as the GFDL.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Wein and 80 guests





