Massive ridge surging over Ophelia.......
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
Massive ridge surging over Ophelia.......
A huge dry air ridge is plummeting SE over Ophelia and Nate. Should have a big influence on steering, I would think.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/FLOAT/WV/20.jpg
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/FLOAT/WV/20.jpg
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
deltadog03 wrote:well, look with KAT's path....a shortwave was suppose to pick kat up and make a second landfall over FL panhandle...well, never happend...this shortwave is suppose to tug this north...well, the shortwave is not digging...so, i have my doubts...
I dont believe i Kat was forecast to be "picked up" by any shortwave. She was to move North into a weakness, which she did, it was just further west than predicted. It had nothing to do with missing a trough.
0 likes
-
NorthGaWeather
dwg71 wrote:deltadog03 wrote:well, look with KAT's path....a shortwave was suppose to pick kat up and make a second landfall over FL panhandle...well, never happend...this shortwave is suppose to tug this north...well, the shortwave is not digging...so, i have my doubts...
I dont believe i Kat was forecast to be "picked up" by any shortwave. She was to move North into a weakness, which she did, it was just further west than predicted. It had nothing to do with missing a trough.
Where's the head hitting the wall emoticon?
Anyways, good point delta.
0 likes
- BensonTCwatcher
- Category 5

- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
- Location: Southport NC
Derek Ortt wrote:its not heading into the EC anytime soon. Too much of a weakness is present
By "soon" I take you mean past 36 hrs. I posted earilier in the other thread that I saw her following the weakness. Right now that would mean a GA to OBX track, but I don't how the ridging will be in 36+ hours. Since we still don't have much movement, my confidence in that will strt to decrease as long as it sits still. I think it will start N as it intensifies.
Recurve is still a distict possibility. I just never thought it would track west based on the climo history.
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
-
Rainband
-
krysof
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive

- Posts: 8250
- Age: 52
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
dwg71 wrote:deltadog03 wrote:well, look with KAT's path....a shortwave was suppose to pick kat up and make a second landfall over FL panhandle...well, never happend...this shortwave is suppose to tug this north...well, the shortwave is not digging...so, i have my doubts...
I dont believe i Kat was forecast to be "picked up" by any shortwave. She was to move North into a weakness, which she did, it was just further west than predicted. It had nothing to do with missing a trough.
She was early on, it was mentioned in a NHC discussion but she missed it, so she took the weakness instead.
0 likes
- linkerweather
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:59 am
- Location: tampa bay area
Katrina was ALWAYS supposed to find the weakness. Because she took a SW jog across Florida, that bascially put the storm farther west prior to finding the weakness, so the northward movement occurred farther west. Had Katrina jogged NW across florida then the northward move would have been farther east. Overall, especially after re-emerging in the GOM, Katrina was extremely well forecast from a track standpoint.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Derek Ortt wrote:any significant motion almost certainly will be to the ENE this time. we may see a quasi landfall during the next 36, but this is going to be around for many days, probably about 200-300 miles offshore
Derek, I'm in the "JB camp". I've seen many storms blocked by highs to the north stalling, drifting west to southwest, then heading off to the west. The GFDL really pegged Katrina, and it may have the best handle on Ophelia. The 12Z GFDL was "interesting", though, with the no movement for 48 hours then a sharp jog NNW for 60-80 miles then back WNW across northern Florida. I don't understand that NNW motion at 48-72 hours. Let's see if the 18Z GFDL is back westerly like the 12Z ECMWF.
I think the GFS and NOGAPS are not identifying the ridge to the north properly and are incorrectly moving Ophelia off to the northeast. The longer Ophelia remains stationary, the greater the chance that the GFDL is correct. And that NHC forecast is nothing short of a joke. They need to take a stand and actually make a forecast, not try to cut their losses by forecasting a track right between two possibilities. Pick one or the other. Out to sea or into the Gulf.
Oh, here's the 12Z ECMWF for 96 and 120 hrs:
http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/ECMWF/e ... emp_96.gif
http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/ECMWF/e ... mp_120.gif
0 likes
-
CYCLONE MIKE
- Category 5

- Posts: 2183
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: Gonzales, LA
wxman57, I am sick at the fact that there is even a remote chance of this getting in the gulf living here in SE LA. I do agree with you though about her entering the gulf. We always see the models down-playing the ridge and over strengthening the troughs. The two scenarios I see happening as of now are the ridge blocks her and sends her southwest acorss Florida then west through the gulf or she moves ENE like Derek says then does a loop and comes back around and crosses central/southern Folrida on a west to wsw heading. Just my ideas. They will more than likely change come tomorrow. That high does look forecast to be awfully strong though. I guess time will tell.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
18Z GFDL just came in. It continued the trend from 12Z - stationary for 60 hours, then a north jog to 30N then WNW into northern Florida by Jacksonville and inland across southern GA/AL. I still don't buy the NE motion by the GFS and NOGAPS, but I could buy a westward movement after 60 hours from wherever the center is at the time.
0 likes
- ameriwx2003
- Category 4

- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am
18Z GFDL is in.. The EURO track seems to make sense to me but who knows;):)
http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... s/05090723
http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... s/05090723
0 likes
- ameriwx2003
- Category 4

- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: StormWeather, tolakram and 154 guests


