Bam joins Ukmet and gfs in northern shift

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Bam joins Ukmet and gfs in northern shift

#1 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:53 pm

ukmet now near nhc track, before it was well south near south texas
Last edited by Ivanhater on Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#2 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:58 pm

yes, the ukmet has shifted north...its near the NHC track...
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#3 Postby skysummit » Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:58 pm

Well at least they seem to be coming to a consensus.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: Ukmet joing gfs in northern shift

#4 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:01 pm

ivanhater wrote:ukmet now near nhc track, before it was well south near south texas


You forgot to mention the GFDL's southern shift. Also, forgot to mention that latest recon fix is 23.77N but NHC has it at 23.9N. So the ridge is not allowing Rita to gain any lattitude. Combine that with her forward speed and you get a track further south.

You have to look at the full picture.
0 likes   

raynpa
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:52 am

#5 Postby raynpa » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:03 pm

dwg where do you live?
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38264
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#6 Postby Brent » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:03 pm

I think they are going to come back south... she is moving quickly and STRAIGHT west right now.
0 likes   
#neversummer

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#7 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:05 pm

raynpa wrote:dwg where do you live?

He's not doing what you may think he's doing. He is being realistic.

And I agree, a track further south is quite possible. The model consensus will very possibly come a bit south, at the least, in the next day or two. This will still be a TX storm, but not an Upper Texas storm.

And you can't accuse me of anything! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: Ukmet joing gfs in northern shift

#8 Postby southerngale » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:07 pm

dwg71 wrote:
ivanhater wrote:ukmet now near nhc track, before it was well south near south texas


You forgot to mention the GFDL's southern shift. Also, forgot to mention that latest recon fix is 23.77N but NHC has it at 23.9N. So the ridge is not allowing Rita to gain any lattitude. Combine that with her forward speed and you get a track further south.

You have to look at the full picture.


Perhaps because this thread was about the northern shift in the UKMET, closer to NHC track? Just a hunch....
0 likes   

raynpa
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:52 am

#9 Postby raynpa » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:07 pm

I was just wondering since he is being so aggressive about the west movement.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#10 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:09 pm

jkt21787 wrote:
raynpa wrote:dwg where do you live?

He's not doing what you may think he's doing. He is being realistic.

And I agree, a track further south is quite possible. The model consensus will very possibly come a bit south, at the least, in the next day or two. This will still be a TX storm, but not an Upper Texas storm.

And you can't accuse me of anything! :D


thanks JKT, I'm just looking at facts and trying, like everyone else, to get a read on what's going to happen. A fast moving storm with slow moving HP ridge = South Texas. Right now that's what I see. Each of the last three recon fixes have been slightly more south each time. That can change.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#11 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:12 pm

The EURO joins the GFDL southern shift....
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#12 Postby skysummit » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:14 pm

and you can see the radar imagery is actually south of the forecast points too.

Image
0 likes   

tw861
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:19 pm
Location: Spring, TX

#13 Postby tw861 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:19 pm

raynpa wrote:I was just wondering since he is being so aggressive about the west movement.


I think he lives in the Houston area, but not sure. What he's doing is reverse -removed-. :D Looking at the latest visible loop, with the track forecast postions overlayed. It looks like that "eye feature" is moving right on track or just a little north and appears to be moving a little north of due west.

I think when it's all said and done here, you have to admit that the NHC has done a pretty good job this year and when they begin to pinpoint an area they are usually darn close in the end. And no matter what I or dwg or any other of the amatuers around here think, in the end I'm going to stick with what the pros say.

The bottom line is it's way to early in the game for anyone whether you live in Houston or Memphis or wherever to be calling the all clear especially when you are dealing with such a large metro area such has Houston.

Now flame away :D
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#14 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:21 pm

Ok, 12Z EURO has shifted slightly north as well!!!!! NORTH..its now right around galveston.....

Image
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#15 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:22 pm

deltadog03 wrote:Ok, 12Z EURO has shifted slightly north as well!!!!! NORTH..its now right around galveston.....

There's another thread on this, and actually this is a SOUTH shift.

Yes, Perry confirms this is 75 miles SW or so of previous position.
Last edited by jkt21787 on Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#16 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:23 pm

tw861 wrote:It looks like that "eye feature" is moving right on track or just a little north and appears to be moving a little north of due west.

No flaming here, but look at skysummit's radar image right above your post. Its south of NHC's points and still moving nearly due west with some fluctuation on either side.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#17 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:23 pm

tw861 wrote:
raynpa wrote:I was just wondering since he is being so aggressive about the west movement.


I think he lives in the Houston area, but not sure. What he's doing is reverse -removed-. :D Looking at the latest visible loop, with the track forecast postions overlayed. It looks like that "eye feature" is moving right on track or just a little north and appears to be moving a little north of due west.

I think when it's all said and done here, you have to admit that the NHC has done a pretty good job this year and when they begin to pinpoint an area they are usually darn close in the end. And no matter what I or dwg or any other of the amatuers around here think, in the end I'm going to stick with what the pros say.

The bottom line is it's way to early in the game for anyone whether you live in Houston or Memphis or wherever to be calling the all clear especially when you are dealing with such a large metro area such has Houston.

Now flame away :D


"reverse -removed-" - I've never heard of that. LOL. What am I saying that doesnt sound right, or would lead you to believe that it's not based on facts.
0 likes   

tw861
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:19 pm
Location: Spring, TX

#18 Postby tw861 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:47 pm

jkt21787 wrote:
tw861 wrote:It looks like that "eye feature" is moving right on track or just a little north and appears to be moving a little north of due west.

No flaming here, but look at skysummit's radar image right above your post. Its south of NHC's points and still moving nearly due west with some fluctuation on either side.


I'm not gonna sit here and debate every point. As far as the radar goes I suppose the argument could be made about where the wind and pressure center is located within the larger rain free circle. I'm assuming you think its directly in the middle, maybe it is, maybe not. The recon postion marked is within the larger circle on the northern edge. The difference from the recon position and your center is probably no more than 10 miles.

So no, I'm not ready to pronouce this a Mexico landfall, although it would be ok with me since my family and I are booked on a flight out of Houston Saturday morning which now may not go and my trip will be ruined.

You need to quit watching every little wobble and look at the big picture as dwg says he's doing. I'm just gonna stick with the pro's on this one, you think they don't see what he claims to be seeing. Their landfall point has been between Galveston and Matagorda for practically the whole time they have had it crossing the Texas coast.

And oooo, the Euro has shifted south to where ? Matagorda moving north , that really takes southeast Texas off the hook huh. The GFS shifted north and you know what they will shift again but when you average them all out for the last few days where is the middle point ? Between Galveston and Matagorda.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#19 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:52 pm

tw861 wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
tw861 wrote:It looks like that "eye feature" is moving right on track or just a little north and appears to be moving a little north of due west.

No flaming here, but look at skysummit's radar image right above your post. Its south of NHC's points and still moving nearly due west with some fluctuation on either side.


I'm not gonna sit here and debate every point. As far as the radar goes I suppose the argument could be made about where the wind and pressure center is located within the larger rain free circle. I'm assuming you think its directly in the middle, maybe it is, maybe not. The recon postion marked is within the larger circle on the northern edge. The difference from the recon position and your center is probably no more than 10 miles.

So no, I'm not ready to pronouce this a Mexico landfall, although it would be ok with me since my family and I are booked on a flight out of Houston Saturday morning which now may not go and my trip will be ruined.

You need to quit watching every little wobble and look at the big picture as dwg says he's doing. I'm just gonna stick with the pro's on this one, you think they don't see what he claims to be seeing. Their landfall point has been between Galveston and Matagorda for practically the whole time they have had it crossing the Texas coast.

And oooo, the Euro has shifted south to where ? Matagorda moving north , that really takes southeast Texas off the hook huh. The GFS shifted north and you know what they will shift again but when you average them all out for the last few days where is the middle point ? Between Galveston and Matagorda.

:lol:
This is a very funny post. You made so many assumptions that are 100% lies about me and my thoughts on this storm, its not even worth addressing.
0 likes   

tw861
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:19 pm
Location: Spring, TX

#20 Postby tw861 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:59 pm

dwg71 wrote:
tw861 wrote:
raynpa wrote:I was just wondering since he is being so aggressive about the west movement.


I think he lives in the Houston area, but not sure. What he's doing is reverse -removed-. :D Looking at the latest visible loop, with the track forecast postions overlayed. It looks like that "eye feature" is moving right on track or just a little north and appears to be moving a little north of due west.

I think when it's all said and done here, you have to admit that the NHC has done a pretty good job this year and when they begin to pinpoint an area they are usually darn close in the end. And no matter what I or dwg or any other of the amatuers around here think, in the end I'm going to stick with what the pros say.

The bottom line is it's way to early in the game for anyone whether you live in Houston or Memphis or wherever to be calling the all clear especially when you are dealing with such a large metro area such has Houston.

Now flame away :D


"reverse -removed-" - I've never heard of that. LOL. What am I saying that doesnt sound right, or would lead you to believe that it's not based on facts.


Ok, whatever. I really don't have time for this anyway. It's not like this is a contest where we will have a winner. I have more to lose than someone in Memphis, so yeah I want it to come this way. Does that sound better to you.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], KirbyDude25, riapal, wwizard and 199 guests