Katrina:Person of the year
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Katrina:Person of the year
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--time-personofyear1114nov14,0,2237617.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
Katrina was a giant mass of swirling clouds witha large eye in the center not a person
Katrina was a giant mass of swirling clouds witha large eye in the center not a person
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29114
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
Re: Katrina:Person of the year
f5 wrote:http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--time-personofyear1114nov14,0,2237617.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
Katrina was a giant mass of swirling clouds witha large eye in the center not a person
I agree fully!! How dumb!!!
0 likes
Re: Katrina:Person of the year
vbhoutex wrote:f5 wrote:http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--time-personofyear1114nov14,0,2237617.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
Katrina was a giant mass of swirling clouds witha large eye in the center not a person
I agree fully!! How dumb!!!
Well...why not? I say go for it. Nothing this year could beat Katrina. President Bush was the "AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY" last year....who would it be if not Katrina?
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: Katrina:Person of the year
~Floydbuster wrote:vbhoutex wrote:f5 wrote:http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--time-personofyear1114nov14,0,2237617.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
Katrina was a giant mass of swirling clouds witha large eye in the center not a person
I agree fully!! How dumb!!!
Well...why not? I say go for it. Nothing this year could beat Katrina. President Bush was the "AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY" last year....who would it be if not Katrina?
Should be the fine men and women on the National Hurricane center and the hurricane hunters...
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 630
- Age: 39
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:02 pm
- Location: Westport, CT
- Contact:
- wxwatcher91
- Category 5
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Keene, NH
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38118
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
aerojad wrote:This would not be the first time the Person of the Year wasn't a person.
Well... it's the name of some people.

0 likes
#neversummer
- Gorky
- Category 1
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 am
- Location: Scarborough, North Yorkshire, UK
As far as natural disasters go, Katrina is nothing compared to the Tsunami, or even the Kashmir earthquake. 400K dead between them, 8 million homeless... Katrina was bad, but naming that alone as the event of the year is incredibly US-centric. I would fully support Mother Nature as a candidate which would encompass all the disasters this year... It also fits better with the 'person' of the year, as I feel Mother Naure is a better anthropomorphism, rather just than a single storm. In the apst, Time have had the computer as the person of the year, so naming an event isn't out there... They've also had Hitler and Stalin as people of the year (in a positive way!), and almost made Osama bin Laden man of the year in 2001 I believe so nominating 'bad things' isn't unheard of.
(I know the Tsunami was late 2004, but it happened after last years person of the year was announced so it would fit into this years category.. Not to mention the months of misery which this year started off too thanks to it.)
(I know the Tsunami was late 2004, but it happened after last years person of the year was announced so it would fit into this years category.. Not to mention the months of misery which this year started off too thanks to it.)
0 likes
did you guys even read the article?
Katrina isnt person of the year just because it was a disaster. Katrina uncovered flaws, in society, gov't and more. there were political backlashes, panic, and the eye-opening of an entire nation, sorry to say, but one that began to assume a mindet of being 'untouchable'.
Katrina wasnt just a natural disaster. Katrina didnt just kill people. She went way beyond that.
Katrina isnt person of the year just because it was a disaster. Katrina uncovered flaws, in society, gov't and more. there were political backlashes, panic, and the eye-opening of an entire nation, sorry to say, but one that began to assume a mindet of being 'untouchable'.
Katrina wasnt just a natural disaster. Katrina didnt just kill people. She went way beyond that.
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Loring wrote:did you guys even read the article?
Katrina isnt person of the year just because it was a disaster. Katrina uncovered flaws, in society, gov't and more. there were political backlashes, panic, and the eye-opening of an entire nation, sorry to say, but one that began to assume a mindet of being 'untouchable'.
Katrina wasnt just a natural disaster. Katrina didnt just kill people. She went way beyond that.
I totally agree. It wasn't JUST a storm, it exposed lots of things and was a big wake up call for alot of people in this nation in terms of poverty.
0 likes
-
- Category 3
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:13 pm
- Location: Fayetteville, NC
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: FLCrackerGirl, johngaltfla, NotSparta and 84 guests