Official 2005 retired names and 2011 list of names

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145630
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Official 2005 retired names and 2011 list of names

#1 Postby cycloneye » Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:57 pm

The meeting of the WMO (World Meteorogical Organization) is underway here at San Juan,Puerto Rico from today thru the 4th of April.The important question of this meeting is what will the 2011 list of names will look like after they decide which of the 2005 hurricanes they will retire their names.And maybe they will use an alternative list of names and talk about the greek names as well.If I get information about the results of the meeting first hand I will post it here.
Last edited by cycloneye on Fri Apr 07, 2006 2:21 pm, edited 17 times in total.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

StormScanWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:53 pm

#2 Postby StormScanWx » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:06 pm

Can't wait to see the new names. Keep us posted. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#3 Postby P.K. » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:08 pm

Does Spain get a say in the names now? :wink: :lol:

lol, reading the article just posted I'm actually correct. "Newcomers to the WMO this year are Spain, Brazil, and Cape Verde, who last year suffered unusual meteorological situations."
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145630
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#4 Postby cycloneye » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:12 pm

March 30, 2006

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- The top U.S. hurricane expert said Thursday that this year's hurricane season is likely to be stronger than average, though short of the record 2005 season, the costliest on record.

"It would be an unbelievable record to have another season like that, that's just not very realistic," said Max Mayfield, director of the National Hurricane Center in Miami.

But he warned that this year's hurricane season, which officially begins on June 1, might be stronger than average.

"I think everybody is going to say we're going to have an above-average season here," Mayfield told a news conference at a San Juan hotel, adding: "We don't have the numbers worked out yet."

A record 27 tropical storms formed in 2005, with seven becoming major hurricanes -- including four that made landfall in the United States.

Representatives of 25 countries from the Caribbean and North and South America met in the Puerto Rican capital on Thursday to discuss hurricane preparedness and sharing data to help improve forecasting. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Hurricane Center and National Centers for Environmental Prediction will release their official hurricane forecast on May 22.

Researchers are trying to better understand storm intensity, particularly after last year's Hurricane Wilma jumped from a tropical storm to a whopping Category 5 hurricane within 24 hours.

D.L. Johnson, director of the NOAA's National Weather Service, said his people are preparing to put up the next generation of weather satellites and want to improve monitoring of upper air currents to help determine where storms will go.

Officials deployed seven buoys in the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean Sea in 2005 to collect data to track hurricanes. Eight more are scheduled to be dropped into the Caribbean next year.

The region has experienced strong hurricanes since 1995, due in part to warm sea surface temperatures, participants said.

"We need to remember that the research community is telling us that we are in this active period for hurricanes that may very well last another 10 to 20 years," Mayfield said. "And that's not good news for this region."

The first tropical storm of the 2006 season will be named Alberto.


Max Mayfield speaking at meeting.
Last edited by cycloneye on Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

StormScanWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:53 pm

#5 Postby StormScanWx » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:16 pm

I wonder what names will be retired....

:?: Dennis :?: Stan :?: Emily :?: Ophelia :?:

I am very very eager to know now that the time to know is upon us. :D

cycloneye, when/if you find out, please Sticky the new names (of the 2011 and the Alternate List) to the top of the forum. Thank you.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145630
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#6 Postby cycloneye » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:19 pm

Interesting what they said about seven more bouys that will be dropped in the Caribbean Sea next year.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#7 Postby SouthFloridawx » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:32 pm

That's great news about the bouys next year also.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#8 Postby southerngale » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:47 pm

cycloneye wrote:Interesting what they said about seven more bouys that will be dropped in the Caribbean Sea next year.

Actually, eight. ;)

Thanks for posting this. Geez...time is FLYING!! I can't believe it's almost April already. It's coming too fast.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145630
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#9 Postby cycloneye » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:48 pm

southerngale wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Interesting what they said about seven more bouys that will be dropped in the Caribbean Sea next year.

Actually, eight. ;)

Thanks for posting this. Geez...time is FLYING!! I can't believe it's almost April already. It's coming too fast.


:oops: Yes Eight. :)
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#10 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:53 pm

Well if they retired Frances a cat-2 at landfall they'll certainly retire Dennis and Emily.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#11 Postby f5 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:04 pm

Hurricane Hunter 914 wrote:Well if they retired Frances a cat-2 at landfall they'll certainly retire Dennis and Emily.


Frances was retired beacuse a nation called France saw the name as an insult it had nothing to do with strength
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#12 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:08 pm

Frances was an upper cat 3 at landfall in the Bahamas and caused severe damage to the central Bahamas

It seems as if some are still thinking that only USA landfalls enable a storm to be retired
0 likes   

tornadotony

#13 Postby tornadotony » Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Frances was an upper cat 3 at landfall in the Bahamas and caused severe damage to the central Bahamas

It seems as if some are still thinking that only USA landfalls enable a storm to be retired

Must we be reminded that Frances caused $9-10 billion in the USA?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#14 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:21 pm

Good 'ol Max. You can always count on him to be the voice of reason, no hype there, that is why I like him and his work so much :bday:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#15 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:25 pm

I know full well what it caused here. However, I did not beleive that it should have been retired for its USA damage since that was due to it impacting such a large area, but for what it did to places such as Cat Island. It's like Wilma should nto be retired for what it did to Florida, but for what it did to the Yucatan
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

#16 Postby GeneratorPower » Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:35 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Wilma should not be retired for what it did to Florida, but for what it did to the Yucatan


Remember, the reason they retire names is not just because of death/damage but also to avoid confusion. Wilma was a record setting hurricane. If there was another hurricane called Wilma down the road, it would be confusing.

Was it the Wilma of 2005 or the Wilma of 2011 that had the record pressure?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#17 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:37 pm

record intensity is not a reason for retirement. Linda in 1997, the most intense EPAC hurricane was not retired, even though some forecasts had it making landfall in California as a hurricane
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#18 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:45 pm

True I remember that. Linda had 185 mph sustained winds I think.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#19 Postby f5 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:15 pm

I bet Katrina is retired
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#20 Postby AussieMark » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:27 pm

storms are normally retired due to damage and deaths I thought.
peak intensities are not even taken into consideration

just say a hurricane reaches a record intensity and is a fish do u think they would even consider retiring the storm. we all know the answer to that without thinking about it
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hurricaneman, PerfectStorm, Steve H. and 52 guests