May need to watch NE of the Islands as well
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
May need to watch NE of the Islands as well
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/cmctc2.c ... hour=096hr
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... hour=096hr
not entire sure f this is purely tropical or not, have not had a chance to look at many other things besides SLP
That said, these two models are far more aggressive in developing this low than the Bahamian one. If both develop, it would probably be the first time that we ever had 3 June storms
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... hour=096hr
not entire sure f this is purely tropical or not, have not had a chance to look at many other things besides SLP
That said, these two models are far more aggressive in developing this low than the Bahamian one. If both develop, it would probably be the first time that we ever had 3 June storms
0 likes
- Aquawind
- Category 5
- Posts: 6714
- Age: 62
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
- Location: Salisbury, NC
- Contact:
Looks like a couple of opportunities..
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/WATL_latest.gif
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/WATL_latest.gif
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
- Aquawind
- Category 5
- Posts: 6714
- Age: 62
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
- Location: Salisbury, NC
- Contact:
SouthFloridawx wrote:A couple of the models have been hinting at this for the past couple of days. I'm not sure which but, according to the Cyclone Phase page CMC and GFS keep it warm core.
06Z sure does..
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase/gfs ... 06/58.html
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
CMC, GFS, and NOGAPS are all forecasting this http://moe.met.fsu.edu/tcgengifs/ CMC and GFS have been forecasting this off and on for several days. GFS cyclone analysis predicts warm-core low, cold-core high and a large gale-force radius (200 km? hard to read those spots). http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase/gfs ... 06/58.html Pressures are high but the Mid-Atlantic background is so high (circa 1025) that even 1010 is a substantial storm.
Actually this looks like it would be a pretty interesting storm.
Actually this looks like it would be a pretty interesting storm.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
skysummit wrote:jlauderdal wrote:Scorpion wrote:Wow, it really sets a precedent about what could happen come August
no it doesnt.
I think the keyword here is "could".
if it sets a precedent than its a done deal and thus the word could is not applicable thus my response.
as orrt rightfully stated it can go both ways so there is no precedent.
0 likes
jlauderdal wrote:skysummit wrote:jlauderdal wrote:Scorpion wrote:Wow, it really sets a precedent about what could happen come August
no it doesnt.
I think the keyword here is "could".
if it sets a precedent than its a done deal and thus the word could is not applicable thus my response.
as orrt rightfully stated it can go both ways so there is no precedent.
Key Phrase of the 2006 season thus far: go both ways
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
StJoe wrote:jlauderdal wrote:skysummit wrote:jlauderdal wrote:Scorpion wrote:Wow, it really sets a precedent about what could happen come August
no it doesnt.
I think the keyword here is "could".
if it sets a precedent than its a done deal and thus the word could is not applicable thus my response.
as orrt rightfully stated it can go both ways so there is no precedent.
Key Phrase of the 2006 season thus far: go both ways
exactly, there is no precedent and there wont be a precedent set. it could mean it will be active and it could mean it wont be active and thus a precedent wont be set.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact: