Viewing convection "Blobs"?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
Viewing convection "Blobs"?
Is anticyclonic rotation more suspicious than cyclonic when looking at a large blob on visible imagery?
0 likes
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 4022
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: Viewing convection "Blobs"?
Stormavoider wrote:Is anticyclonic rotation more suspicious than cyclonic when looking at a large blob on visible imagery?
Obviously, it depends exactly where in the image the rotation is, the synoptic setup etc.
Of course, you already know that cyclonic rotation at the lower and middle levels = good, and anticyclonic rotation at the upper levels also = good. I would probably put low level cyclonic rotation as being a little more suspicious, since my mantra is "convection = overrated, vorticity = underrated"
What I would suggest as ways to sharpen your "vis imagery" skills would be to practice:
1) picking out the movement of CU elements on visible imagery.
2) using a stationary reference such as a LALO line or a land mass to better understand how a fast moving system that seems to have a closed wind circ, more often does not.
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
1) picking out the movement of CU elements on visible imagery.
2) using a stationary reference such as a LALO line or a land mass to better understand how a fast moving system that seems to have a closed wind circ, more often does not.
What does the bolded text mean?
Still learning here so it's great to hear some different terms.
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 4022
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
PTrackerLA wrote:dizzyfish wrote:I think "LALO line" would mean Latitude or Longitude lines.
But the "CU elements" part has me stumped!
I believe he means "cumulus" as in low level clouds.
'zackly.
It's simply the small pixels (elements) that make up the low level cloud field. 'Element' is a word that stuck with me from a remote sensing class I took back in the 80s.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Miami Storm Tracker and 51 guests