2006 Atlantic names retired: NONE!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

2006 Atlantic names retired: NONE!

#1 Postby Chacor » Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:19 am

Just an FYI for those who forgot, that the RA IV Hurricane Committee 29th session is currently underway in Curaçao and Aruba in the Netherlands Antilles. It will last until April 3.

You can find working documents here: http://www.wmo.ch/web/www/TCP/Meetings/HC29/index.html

Key documents:
Committee chairman report
Review of 2006 seasons (Atl, EPac)
Antigua annual report
Colombia, Spain, Mexico annual reports
French territories annual report
Canada annual report
Cuba annual report

-----------
Looking through that, the report from the Chairman had a paragraph that stood out for me, because I didn't know that this was occurring:
Chairman's report wrote:After an exchange of views between Lixion Avila (RSMC Miami) and the staff of the “Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia de Espana”, as well as the participation of Spain in the RA IV Hurricane Committee in 2006, the “Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia de Espana” created a small unit of tropical meteorology. The center began issuing special bulletins in close coordination with RSMC Miami when a tropical cyclone was within 1000 km from Spain. The Institution issued the first advisory during Hurricane Gordon which eventually affected Spain as a strong extratropical system. The Institution also offered to translate some of the RSMC Miami tropical cyclone products into Spanish.
Last edited by Chacor on Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34065
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#2 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:17 pm

One key question is whether or not any names (in either the Atlantic or Pacific) will be retired; I am guessing the lists will remain intact for 2012 (first time since 1994 that no names in either basin would be retired if that happens - first time since 1997 in the Atlantic).
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2041
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#3 Postby Hurricanehink » Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:03 pm

I find this very surprising in the Canada report.

"3. In late October an extratropical cyclone persisted in the northern Pacific. The storm drifted over anomalously warm water and developed central convection, eventually developing a clear eye and eyewall. The system dissipated in early November, but not before bringing very heavy rains to portions of Vancouver Island. It was never officially declared to be a tropical cyclone."

To me, that sounds like they thought it was a tropical cyclone, but it was never officially declared.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#4 Postby P.K. » Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:29 pm

That was 91C wasn't it?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2041
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#5 Postby Hurricanehink » Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:24 pm

P.K. wrote:That was 91C wasn't it?


Yea. The only group, IIRC, that said it was a tropical cyclone was NASA, though that was obviously unofficial.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#6 Postby Chacor » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:07 am

I emailed the NHC to ask why there hasn't been a press release regarding retirements.

The answer, "No names were retired from the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season. Press releases are not issued if there is no news."

Emphasis mine. First year since 1997 no Atlantic names have been retired. Presumably this means no Pacific names were retired, as well.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34065
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#7 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:22 am

No real surprise there. The 2006 list remains intact.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2041
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#8 Postby Hurricanehink » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:48 am

Wait, how do you know there won't be any EPAC retirements?
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#9 Postby Chacor » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:51 am

Hurricanehink wrote:Wait, how do you know there won't be any EPAC retirements?


I don't know, but it's a presumption based on the same principle that no news = no press release. And since the EPac was discussed at the same meeting, it's likely.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#10 Postby MiamiensisWx » Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:32 am

This is not surprising. I believed the most likely candidate for retirement was Ernesto due to extensive impacts from the Carolinas through Canada. This is a huge difference when compared with the past several years.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, ElectricStorm, facemane, islandgirl45, johngaltfla, Keldeo1997, LAF92, ouragans, Pelicane, Stratton23, TampaWxLurker, Tireman4 and 133 guests