Very interesting story here.....
http://www.miamiherald.com/548/story/109372.html
MIAMI HERALD EXCLUSIVE
Storm director says feds wasting millions
The parent agency of the National Hurricane Center wants to rename the center and is wasting money on other public relations efforts, the center's new director said.
BY MARTIN MERZER
mmerzer@MiamiHerald.com
The new director of the National Hurricane Center escalated his criticism of superiors in the federal government Wednesday, charging they are squandering millions on counterproductive image-building campaigns while front-line forecasters wrestle with budget shortfalls.
Bill Proenza, who took the hurricane center post in January, said top officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are spending $4 million on a ''bogus'' 200-year NOAA anniversary celebration.
That celebration is part of a broader campaign to publicize NOAA and its leaders, Proenza and other critics said, while diminishing the identity of its best-known components, the National Weather Service and the hurricane center.
Meanwhile, Proenza said, NOAA has cut $700,000 from a crucial hurricane research program and allowed other important initiatives to go unfunded, but it wants to spend money to change the widely recognized center's name to the ``NOAA Hurricane Center.''
In the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Proenza and former hurricane center director Max Mayfield said, NOAA even ordered them to remove the National Weather Service logo from official tracking maps and retain only the NOAA logo. They refused.
''It's getting to the point where I cannot tolerate this,'' Proenza told The Miami Herald when asked about critical comments from emergency managers about NOAA's budget priorities and its public relations campaigns.
The statements from him and other high-ranking officials suggest that potentially disruptive battles are under way in the sprawling NOAA bureaucracy that Americans depend on for crucial information about hurricanes and other natural phenomena.
NOAA'S RESPONSE
NOAA officials in Washington rejected the criticisms, saying the anniversary campaign is costing $1.5 million over two years and helps explain their mission to the public.
Anson Franklin, NOAA's director of communications, also said the agency has no intention of destroying the National Weather Service, though it does intend to bring it, the hurricane center and similar agencies more firmly under the NOAA ``corporate identity.''
''I can assure you, we are not going to throw the baby out with the bath water,'' Franklin said. ``The National Weather Service is probably one of the best-recognized organizations in the country. Everybody uses it.
''I don't think we will do anything that would really take away from that,'' Franklin said. ``But we think that the people who use the weather service should know and understand that it is a part of NOAA.''
The National Hurricane Center is part of the National Weather Service, which is part of NOAA, which is part of the U.S. Commerce Department.
The six-month hurricane season begins June 1, and scientists say it is likely to be unusually active.
Craig Fugate, Florida's director of emergency management, said details shared by NOAA employees concern him.
''It's all about petty jealousies,'' Fugate said. ``People don't know who NOAA is -- they think he's the guy who built the ark.
''So, if I'm NOAA, particularly the administrators, and no one will play with me,'' Fugate said, ``I want to get the popular kid and rename him with my name.''
R. David Paulison, director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, urged NOAA to ``not make a rash decision.''
''The National Weather Service brand has been around a long time, and people depend on that,'' Paulison said. ``I would hope that they would consider very carefully before taking the brand name away.''
The critical comments from Paulison, Fugate and Proenza came during two days of interviews on the sidelines of the Governor's Hurricane Conference at the Broward County Convention Center.
Proenza said the issue is of vital public interest because it touches on important funding issues. ''What's happening is scary,'' he said.
If the National Weather Service and similar operations lose their identities, he said, their funding will be absorbed and possibly diluted by NOAA and they will have to battle for every dollar.
NOAA's annual budget is around $4 billion, Franklin said.
''If NOAA achieves a strong presence in the eyes of the people who use its varied services, the agency will be more successful in budget matters,'' he said.
The hurricane center's annual budget is $6.3 million, and Proenza has said he needs a lot more.
NOAA documents obtained by The Miami Herald confirm officials have been floating the idea of changing the name of the National Hurricane Center in West Miami-Dade County to the NOAA Hurricane Center.
In addition, NOAA has proposed changing the National Weather Service to the NOAA Weather Service, the National Ocean Service to the NOAA Ocean Service and so on.
Other documents and an obscure NOAA website -- http://www.weather.gov/banners/nws.php -- indicate NOAA wants to use its logo in place of the National Weather Service logo atop virtually all federal weather-related websites.
The effort to deemphasize the weather service's identity has been in the works for a while, Proenza and others said, and intensified just after Katrina ripped through New Orleans and the upper Gulf Coast in 2005.
As forecasters struggled to cope with the storm and its aftermath, NOAA headquarters ordered them to delete the weather service's logo from tracking maps that were being viewed by millions of people.
Mayfield, then in charge of the hurricane center, and Proenza, then in charge of the weather service's Southern district, which includes the stricken Gulf Coast areas, refused to comply.
''Our people still had no power and no days off,'' said Mayfield, who retired in January and now works for WPLG-ABC 10. ``I pushed back and said I wasn't going to do that. That was one battle I felt I had won.''
But those efforts are under way again, Proenza said, and will gain momentum if NOAA diminishes or eradicates the weather service's presence on the Internet.
At the same time, NOAA is engaging in a 200-year anniversary celebration, even though the agency has been in existence since only 1970. That campaign includes various public events and a full-color, fold-out brochure titled, NOAA, Celebrating 200 Years of Science, Service and Stewardship.
Franklin said several of NOAA's component agencies are 200 years old, so the celebration is appropriate. ''We're proud of our forebears,'' he said.
He said the campaign is costing $1.5 million, though Proenza said he was told costs would add up to about $4 million.
According to the minutes of a Jan. 3, 2005, meeting of the NOAA Executive Panel, obtained by The Miami Herald, officials discussed the celebration and ``some concern was noted that excessive spending would expose NOAA to criticism.''
OTHER CONTROVERSIES
The identity crisis and funding controversies are the latest to embroil NOAA, which has confronted a variety of issues in recent years.
The Miami Herald's Blind Eye series reported two years ago that defective buoys, weather balloons and other equipment and stagnant budgets were inhibiting progress in improving forecasts. Late that year, Congress approved more than $25 million in emergency spending for new equipment.
Proenza, a 40-year veteran of the weather service, has a long reputation as a candid critic of NOAA.
Still, he shocked the bureaucracy last month when he told The Miami Herald -- during the National Hurricane Conference in New Orleans, his public debut as hurricane director -- that Congress and NOAA were bleeding forecasters of resources they need to protect Americans.
This week, the escalation of his criticism came -- at times -- while a public information officer from NOAA headquarters in Washington stood at Proenza's side.
Is Proenza, 62, risking the loss of his new job?
''I was told that NOAA doesn't want to muzzle its leaders,'' he said. ``And they don't expect me to lie.''
But he acknowledged that he needs to be careful.
''If I'm going to be effective in what I'm trying to do for this entire hurricane program,'' he said, ``I can't allow myself to be fired.''
Storm director says feds wasting millions
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: Temple, Texas
- Janie2006
- Category 5
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes
Anson Franklin, NOAA's director of communications, also said the agency has no intention of destroying the National Weather Service, though it does intend to bring it, the hurricane center and similar agencies more firmly under the NOAA ``corporate identity.''
There are a hundred different things wrong with this statement. There is already far too much "corporate identification" going on in the federal government.
In addition, NOAA has proposed changing the National Weather Service to the NOAA Weather Service, the National Ocean Service to the NOAA Ocean Service and so on.
Why bother? Even a cursory glance at the NWS webpage reveals the true name to be NOAA's National Weather Service. So you have to ask yourself...what's really going on here?
0 likes
- Janie2006
- Category 5
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes
Furthermore, I'll explain myself: The purpose of NOAA's NWS and NHC is to protect life and property...not to maximize profit. One should not be wastefull of public funds and should use them in the best manner possible. However, the use of "corporate identity" by an agency such as NOAA should be setting off alarm bells. NOAA is not Proctor and Gamble. I should think the agency officials have better things to do with the people's time and money rather than launching hare-brained schemes guaranteed to alienate half of their own staff.
0 likes
vbhoutex wrote:jschlitz wrote:Re: Proenza
The season hasn't even started and I like the guy already.
Me too!! I just hope his "fighting" with his superiors doesn't lead to his dismissal!!!
You are exactly right about the current administration. He probably will get fired. This administration has been all about PR but never about actually fixing/solving problems from day one!
0 likes
- StormTracker
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2903
- Age: 59
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
- Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
What people do?
Oh, no, a big storm is threatening! What will I google for information? Oh, I know! "Oceanic and Atmospheric"!
Riduculous as the rebranding is for the NHC, it's even worse for the NWS. I'm sure "Oceanic" pops to mind as the place to go for tornado info if you're in Kansas.
In the business world, the excuse for rebranding that the mangers and consultants get to bilk the stockholder as they confuse customers and waste brand value. I don't understand this at all. Who gains?

Riduculous as the rebranding is for the NHC, it's even worse for the NWS. I'm sure "Oceanic" pops to mind as the place to go for tornado info if you're in Kansas.
In the business world, the excuse for rebranding that the mangers and consultants get to bilk the stockholder as they confuse customers and waste brand value. I don't understand this at all. Who gains?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, Google Adsense [Bot], Pelicane, Stratton23 and 31 guests