Reference: Katrina Landfall Radar Images

Discuss the recovery and aftermath of landfalling hurricanes. Please be sensitive to those that have been directly impacted. Political threads will be deleted without notice. This is the place to come together not divide.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Reference: Katrina Landfall Radar Images

#1 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Sep 03, 2005 11:24 pm

SE Florida:
Image

Buras, LA:
Image

Mississippi:
Image

This might clear up some things about the debate of whether Katrina was a Cat 5 at landfall (in LA). Also just for anyone who is interested to see.

EDIT: GRLevel2 Images at MS Landfall:

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Last edited by wxmann_91 on Sun Sep 04, 2005 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29096
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#2 Postby vbhoutex » Sat Sep 03, 2005 11:32 pm

I'm not sue how those images would clear up whether Katrina was a CAT5 at landfall, but they definitely show a very intense Hurricane landfalling.
0 likes   

Hurricane_Apu
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:47 pm

#3 Postby Hurricane_Apu » Sat Sep 03, 2005 11:56 pm

Remember that the NOLA radar malfunctioned and finally failed during landfall... I'm not sure the radar presentation was really *that* bad...

Still clearly weaker than it was at peak...
0 likes   

User avatar
thunderchief
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:03 pm

#4 Postby thunderchief » Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:17 am

Hurricane_Apu wrote:Remember that the NOLA radar malfunctioned and finally failed during landfall... I'm not sure the radar presentation was really *that* bad...

Still clearly weaker than it was at peak...


radar gets attenuated by rainfall, and at extended range the beam is often above the tops of storms. You cant judge exact intensity by the presentation of reflectivity radar. Base velocities would be the radar product of choice... youd have to reduce that to surface however.
0 likes   

Doc Seminole

#5 Postby Doc Seminole » Sun Sep 04, 2005 6:02 am

I witness accounts would help but I believe the primary destruction was from the tremendous storm surge that built up when it was a Cat 5. Unstoppable all the way to the coast no matter how much the actual storm diminished.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneGirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5839
Age: 60
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Clare, Michigan
Contact:

#6 Postby HurricaneGirl » Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:58 am

:uarrow: Yes it maintained Cat 5 Surge even if the wind was Cat 4 strength as we all know what it did. :(
0 likes   

aumoore
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:55 pm
Location: Pace, FL

#7 Postby aumoore » Sun Sep 04, 2005 1:26 pm

Doc Seminole wrote:I witness accounts would help but I believe the primary destruction was from the tremendous storm surge that built up when it was a Cat 5. Unstoppable all the way to the coast no matter how much the actual storm diminished.


Remember this storm was not only a Cat 5 but a strong
cat 5 with sustained winds in excess of 175MPH just hours b4 landfall. The storm surge had to be tremendous. Remember they were comparing this storm to the winds in a level three tornado. A 30 mile wide level three tornado is scary.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#8 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Sep 04, 2005 5:44 pm

bump, I've added 35 images from GRLevel2.
0 likes   


Return to “Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests