Audrey2Katrina wrote:That could be a "young" bad "moon" a risin. ( as in Landrieu )
Well, wasn't his dad/uncle/whateva! called "Moon" ???
![]()
A2K
lol - his dad!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Audrey2Katrina wrote:ROCK wrote:vbhoutex wrote:He has been in Houston campaigning amoung the evacuees that now live here!!! I think the man is desperate. I must stop I am getting political.
He is desperate and hopefully his transparency will show. IMO, the man should give up on politics. He's already showed he can't handle the pressure. If NO re-elects him into office again, you won't see me donating jack the next time the city is wiped out.
Sad to say, but IF the election were only among the folk who had the wherewithal to get back into the city or at least in its immediate environs were to be the only vote tallied, he'd be a gone pecan. It's the potential for fraud Vb alluded to that I feel will get him into the runoff--which will assure that I won't be investing in prospects of a return to the city proper any time soon. If they can't give us strong leadership and competent reliable protection--I'll remain where it's relatively safer.
A2K
TSmith274 wrote: A2K, you're dissapointing me here! Aaron Broussard??? Just kidding.
TSmith274 wrote: I really think that we'll end up with a good mayor. Come on back to Orleans where you belong A2K... you're roots run too deep.
Pearl River wrote:Word on the street in New Orleans is that the majority that is left there will not be voting for Nagin.
After his recent " of the 23 running, the majority don't look like us " statement to african-american evacuees in Houston, if he does get re-elected, they deserve the problems they have.
Pearl River wrote:Word on the street in New Orleans is that the majority that is left there will not be voting for Nagin.
After his recent " of the 23 running, the majority don't look like us " statement to african-american evacuees in Houston, if he does get re-elected, they deserve the problems they have.
TSmith274 wrote:Pearl River wrote:Word on the street in New Orleans is that the majority that is left there will not be voting for Nagin.
After his recent " of the 23 running, the majority don't look like us " statement to african-american evacuees in Houston, if he does get re-elected, they deserve the problems they have.
You got that right! I'm sick of this man's racist comments. I really didn't think he was racist when I voted for him the last time. Boy was I wrong.
I sure hope he loses, but with 23 cantidates splitting the vote, 95% of whom are white... I'm a little worried. Best we can hope for is a runoff, unfortunately. But, if we get to a runoff, he'll get slaughtered... believe me.
Almost willing to bet that people here are still mouching off of LA's welfare system....
“There was all this talk about this being an opportunity to change New Orleans forever and maybe everybody shouldn’t come back, and maybe this is an opportunity to kind of change New Orleans and go back to what it used to be,” he told the audience. “I have 23 candidates running for mayor and very few of ‘em look like us.”
Pearl River wrote:Quote from WWL TV site. Nagin's speech to NAACP in Houston.“There was all this talk about this being an opportunity to change New Orleans forever and maybe everybody shouldn’t come back, and maybe this is an opportunity to kind of change New Orleans and go back to what it used to be,” he told the audience. “I have 23 candidates running for mayor and very few of ‘em look like us.”
A considerable amount of data was collected during the New Orleans evacuation associated with Hurricane Ivan in September 2004. Dr. Jeanne Hurlbert and Dr. John J. Beggs, professors in the Dept. of Sociology at LSU, studied how individuals in the New Orleans area would respond to a major hurricane. Their phone survey excluded those living in households without telephones. Those households are disproportionately poor, minority residents. These individuals are also much more likely than to reside in vulnerable housing. In some parts of the city, the proportion of households that lacks telephones is high — as much as 25%. Based on a 2004 telephone survey [that excluded these households], the LSU professors, found that overall, 68.8% of respondents would leave the area, 9.8% would leave their homes but remain in the area, and 21.4% would remain in their homes. That 21.4% of respondents would remain in their homes is a startling and important statistic, because it indicates that nearly 1 in 4 residents would refuse to leave their homes and 3 in 10 would refuse to leave the area.
stormie_skies wrote:Geez.....its been a while.......and I know this is probably not the first thread I should jump into..... but y'all reminded me of a couple of studies I've run across recently dealing with evacuations, and I'd just like to share, K?
According to the Army's official assessment, approximately 69% of the residents of the Florida panhandle evacuated in anticipation of Hurricane Ivan:
http://chps.sam.usace.army.mil/USHESdata/Assessments/2004Storms/PDFfiles/Ivan%20Final%20Behave%20Part4.pdf
About the same percentage - 69% - of people in
Catagory 1 & 2 storm surge zones fled when Andrew was on his way:
http://chps.sam.usace.army.mil/USHESdata/Assessments/andrew/chapter_3behave.htm
Also, check out this study, which I found here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/ops/hurricane-pam.htmA considerable amount of data was collected during the New Orleans evacuation associated with Hurricane Ivan in September 2004. Dr. Jeanne Hurlbert and Dr. John J. Beggs, professors in the Dept. of Sociology at LSU, studied how individuals in the New Orleans area would respond to a major hurricane. Their phone survey excluded those living in households without telephones. Those households are disproportionately poor, minority residents. These individuals are also much more likely than to reside in vulnerable housing. In some parts of the city, the proportion of households that lacks telephones is high — as much as 25%. Based on a 2004 telephone survey [that excluded these households], the LSU professors, found that overall, 68.8% of respondents would leave the area, 9.8% would leave their homes but remain in the area, and 21.4% would remain in their homes. That 21.4% of respondents would remain in their homes is a startling and important statistic, because it indicates that nearly 1 in 4 residents would refuse to leave their homes and 3 in 10 would refuse to leave the area.
Now, my memory might be failing me, but wasn't it concluded that approximately 75% to 80% of NOLA residents evacuated? And if so, wouldn't that mean that the evac actually went rather smoothly, as well as any study had predicted?
Oh, and I missed you guys.......... more later.....
stormie_skies wrote:Oh, I don't disagree that things could have went better - things could ALWAYS go better. And yeah, a few things could have and should have been done to better prepare the Superdome (the Convention Center was never designated as a shelter). I was just responding to those who said that there was a failure in getting people out or to higher ground - cuz statistically, NOLA & Nagin did pretty well in that department. Just puttin the facts out there, thats all.....![]()
Now, as for Nagin's election chances.... the key factors IMO are how many displaced evacuees vote and how well these other candidates make themselves known to those evacuees. Name recognition runs very much in Nagin's favor, and there are plenty of other candidates to split the anti-Nagin vote (is there going to be a run off?).... but we all know how much he has made an ass outta himself lately....so only time will tell.
I just hope whoever wins has the leadership skills to get y'alls city back up & running again.
Return to “Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests