First Mention of Mass graves

Discuss the recovery and aftermath of landfalling hurricanes. Please be sensitive to those that have been directly impacted. Political threads will be deleted without notice. This is the place to come together not divide.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
jburns
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:33 pm
Location: Archdale, NC

First Mention of Mass graves

#1 Postby jburns » Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:14 pm

Senator Carol Moseley Braun just said on CNN that they are discussing mass graves.
0 likes   

Doc Seminole

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#2 Postby Doc Seminole » Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:30 pm

jburns wrote:Senator Carol Moseley Braun just said on CNN that they are discussing mass graves.


I heard that. Another racial dig from the overtones.

I don't know, if you have 10+ thousand bodies and many of them are over 250-300 lbs. and some much more..... well, how in the world would they (whoever "they" are) be able to give everyone of them a single funeral.

Dang, one dead person of regular build would be hard for me to deal with given the state of decomposition, I mean what a friggin nightmare finding hundreds of 300 lb bodies in attics or floating in the water for who knows how many days. I mean you are talkin the most ......... well I ain't goin into it.

God bless all those that will have to deal with it. Anyone complaining how it will be dealt with needs to be on the front lines climbing into attics and fishing them out of water.

Doc Seminole 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
huricanwatcher
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 65
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Kirkwood NY
Contact:

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#3 Postby huricanwatcher » Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:33 pm

Doc Seminole wrote:Dang, one dead person of regular build would be hard for me to deal with given the state of decomposition, I mean what a friggin nightmare finding hundreds of 300 lb bodies in attics or floating in the water for who knows how many days. I mean you are talkin the most ......... well I ain't goin into it.


were did you get the idea that most these bodies are 250-300 lbs?..... :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
themusk
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Burlington, VT

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#4 Postby themusk » Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:38 pm

huricanwatcher wrote:
Doc Seminole wrote:Dang, one dead person of regular build would be hard for me to deal with given the state of decomposition, I mean what a friggin nightmare finding hundreds of 300 lb bodies in attics or floating in the water for who knows how many days. I mean you are talkin the most ......... well I ain't goin into it.


were did you get the idea that most these bodies are 250-300 lbs?..... :roll:


Most of them are much less. It was children and the frail elderly who have, disproportionately, died.
0 likes   

User avatar
huricanwatcher
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 65
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Kirkwood NY
Contact:

#5 Postby huricanwatcher » Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:41 pm

i tend to agree with musk .... social stipulation ..... leads to conclusions that the general population of the poorer people tend to be "overweight" ... get real
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#6 Postby mf_dolphin » Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:43 pm

themusk wrote:
huricanwatcher wrote:
Doc Seminole wrote:Dang, one dead person of regular build would be hard for me to deal with given the state of decomposition, I mean what a friggin nightmare finding hundreds of 300 lb bodies in attics or floating in the water for who knows how many days. I mean you are talkin the most ......... well I ain't goin into it.


were did you get the idea that most these bodies are 250-300 lbs?..... :roll:


Most of them are much less. It was children and the frail elderly who have, disproportionately, died.


I might buy the elderly but what evidence of a large proportion of children have died? You're being just as guilty of assumption as the person you are criticizing.
0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 633
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#7 Postby NC George » Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:58 pm

huricanwatcher wrote:were did you get the idea that most these bodies are 250-300 lbs?..... :roll:


New Orleans was Americas most obese city. Fact: they have specials on TV about it on Discovery Health.
0 likes   

User avatar
themusk
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Burlington, VT

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#8 Postby themusk » Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:03 pm

mf_dolphin wrote:
themusk wrote:
huricanwatcher wrote:
Doc Seminole wrote:Dang, one dead person of regular build would be hard for me to deal with given the state of decomposition, I mean what a friggin nightmare finding hundreds of 300 lb bodies in attics or floating in the water for who knows how many days. I mean you are talkin the most ......... well I ain't goin into it.


were did you get the idea that most these bodies are 250-300 lbs?..... :roll:


Most of them are much less. It was children and the frail elderly who have, disproportionately, died.


I might buy the elderly but what evidence of a large proportion of children have died? You're being just as guilty of assumption as the person you are criticizing.


Media reports. Supported by the medical facts that children are much more vulnerable to dehydration, infection, and, of course, drowning.
0 likes   

charley
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 7:19 pm
Location: Melbourne, Florida

#9 Postby charley » Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:04 pm

Don't water-logged bodies weigh a whole lot, regardless of what the person weighed when they were alive? I don't know that all adult bodies would weigh 250-300 pounds, but I'd bet many will, especially adult males.

I think that was the point the other poster was trying to make, not that everyone in NO is overweight.

Maybe I'm wrong, but from what I recall, human tissue can absorb a lot of water and a dead body becomes extremely bloated and water-logged when immersed in water for days (not to even get into what decomposition is like for those water-logged bodies). It's very reaistic to think many would weigh 250-300 pounds. Regardless of weight, it's going to be a gruesome task retrieving those people.
0 likes   

Una
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Contact:

Re: First Mention of Mass graves

#10 Postby Una » Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:14 pm

huricanwatcher wrote:
Doc Seminole wrote:Dang, one dead person of regular build would be hard for me to deal with given the state of decomposition, I mean what a friggin nightmare finding hundreds of 300 lb bodies in attics or floating in the water for who knows how many days. I mean you are talkin the most ......... well I ain't goin into it.


were did you get the idea that most these bodies are 250-300 lbs?..... :roll:

Im not quite sure how I should put this, but bodies trapped underwater tend to "plump" and take on water. Its the same effect as getting "pruned" hands from spending too long in a hot bath.
As I understand it a deceased person could swell to roughly double their normal size after only a week underwater.

And on that note, I find it absolutely horrifying that Im explaining this about actuall people, rather then as a hypothetical situation.

-Ed
0 likes   

User avatar
mvtrucking
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 698
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:01 am
Location: Monroe,La

#11 Postby mvtrucking » Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:15 pm

charley wrote:Don't water-logged bodies weigh a whole lot, regardless of what the person weighed when they were alive? I don't know that all adult bodies would weigh 250-300 pounds, but I'd bet many will, especially adult males.

I think that was the point the other poster was trying to make, not that everyone in NO is overweight.

Maybe I'm wrong, but from what I recall, human tissue can absorb a lot of water and a dead body becomes extremely bloated and water-logged when immersed in water for days (not to even get into what decomposition is like for those water-logged bodies). It's very reaistic to think many would weigh 250-300 pounds. Regardless of weight, it's going to be a gruesome task retrieving those people.


Yes, a body that has been in the water for an extended period of time will gain weight.

(Former Army medic)
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#12 Postby southerngale » Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:32 pm

This is so disturbing. While my heart is breaking for these people, I'm angry there were so many there! :(
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

#13 Postby Cookiely » Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:56 pm

I've read the most difficult bodies for medical examiners are bodies immersed in salt water and burn victims. As sad as it is for families, it maybe the most humane for the people doing the work.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#14 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:48 pm

Wouldn't cremation be a better alternative to mass graves?
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

#15 Postby Pebbles » Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:05 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:Wouldn't cremation be a better alternative to mass graves?


This is going to sound really cold. I don't think there is any easy way to discuss this :( But it is a reality of the situation. You would think for sanitation and to prevent disease burning would be a better ...but for a few things. We don't know what was in that water the would of been absorbed and set off in the air with burning. It is not going to be easy to burn bodies bloated by water. Also people are going to be in an uproar over mass graves (it's going to be a nessesity unfortunately to prevent disease) can you imagine how they will react to mass burning of the dead?

Everyone needs to get prepared now. Once the resources turn to recovery instead of rescue, media coverage is going to get very ugly and what we already consider horrific now on TV is going to be a cakewalk in comparison. :(

Gosh I hate posting like this and being so utterly depressing.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#16 Postby GalvestonDuck » Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:36 pm

Perhaps maybe they could educate people about how it (cremation on pyres) was done in Galveston. I agree that it would be the best way. As with the 1900 victims and those from 9/11, it would be difficult for families to not have a grave site to go to, but I pray many understand will understand the...advantage, for lack of a better word.
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#17 Postby azsnowman » Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:05 pm

charley wrote:Don't water-logged bodies weigh a whole lot, regardless of what the person weighed when they were alive? I don't know that all adult bodies would weigh 250-300 pounds, but I'd bet many will, especially adult males.

I think that was the point the other poster was trying to make, not that everyone in NO is overweight.

Maybe I'm wrong, but from what I recall, human tissue can absorb a lot of water and a dead body becomes extremely bloated and water-logged when immersed in water for days (not to even get into what decomposition is like for those water-logged bodies). It's very reaistic to think many would weigh 250-300 pounds. Regardless of weight, it's going to be a gruesome task retrieving those people.


Talking from experience here, they do weigh more, I just did a water recovery 3 weeks ago, a 16 yr old male drowned at a local lake, my cadaver dog made the "hit".......divers were sent in where my dog indicated, pulled the remains out 2 hours later.

It is something that you NEVER get used to, I've been dispatched to MANY a death scene and all of them are just like the first one, but you find a way to muddle through it. Being in the "Brotherhood" of law enforcement, you rely HEAVILY on your partners, your brothers for strength.

Dennis
0 likes   

cancunkid
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:48 pm
Location: Landlocked Ozarks

#18 Postby cancunkid » Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:51 pm

I imagine that religion will play a big part in how they deal with a large number of the dead. I would think a mass grave would be difficult however because exactly where are they going to take these folks from NO to bury them? Certainly not NO.
0 likes   

User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 57
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

#19 Postby LSU2001 » Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:55 pm

Yep religion will play into the disposal of the bodies. Remember NO is a predominantly Catholic area and even though cremation is no longer forbidden it is still not embraced by many of the faithful.
Tim
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Mattie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: North Texas (formerly South Louisiana)
Contact:

#20 Postby Mattie » Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:55 pm

And for a reality thought - the families of these people who would be able to claim on insurance benefits, etc. will have a very difficult time without death certificates. This mass moving of evacuees should include an identiification process of some sort so so that remaining family members (if any in some/lot of cases) can truly get benefits that are due to them.
0 likes   


Return to “Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests