Why did the National Hurricane Center discontinue this product?

If you have a question, don't care what it is ~ If you need a hand, We can assure you this ~ We can help

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Dean_175
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:34 pm

Why did the National Hurricane Center discontinue this product?

#1 Postby Dean_175 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 5:03 am

I remember several years ago- the NHC would give a formalized break down of the probability that a storm would be at any given intensity category at a given time- it looked something like this:

12 hours : dissipated : 0 percent, TS : 0 percent, Category 1: 15 percent, Category 2: 20 percent, Category 3: 40 percent, Category 4: 20 percent, Cat 5: 5 %
24 hours : ditto

They have removed this product from their page. It was very insightful, as it gave an estimated likelihood that the system would fall into each category-- almost like a forecast cone , but for intensities.
1 likes   
All posts by Dean_175 are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3535
Age: 29
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: Why did the National Hurricane Center discontinue this product?

#2 Postby Extratropical94 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 5:36 am

Dean_175 wrote:I remember several years ago- the NHC would give a formalized break down of the probability that a storm would be at any given intensity category at a given time- it looked something like this:

12 hours : dissipated : 0 percent, TS : 0 percent, Category 1: 15 percent, Category 2: 20 percent, Category 3: 40 percent, Category 4: 20 percent, Cat 5: 5 %
24 hours : ditto

They have removed this product from their page. It was very insightful, as it gave an estimated likelihood that the system would fall into each category-- almost like a forecast cone , but for intensities.


You are talking about the Maximum Wind Speed Probability Tables and Graphics, as seen in the image below.

It was discontinued in 2014 due to the problem of many users misinterpreting the data shown in the table.

I was a fan of that graphic as well, mainly because of the amount of probabilities and detailed information.

Official statement :darrow:
Effective May 15,2014 the following changes will take place with
the text Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probability (PWS) product
issued by the National Hurricane Center and Central Pacific
Hurricane Center:

1. Removal of Maximum Wind Speed (Intensity) Probability Table
(Table I) This table gives the likelihood that a tropical
cyclone will be at any of several different intensity
categories (e.g., depression, storm, category 1 hurricane,
etc.) at fixed points in time (e.g., 12 hours, 24 hours, 36
hours, etc.). These probabilities are estimated by creating
a large number of potential track and intensity scenarios
based on the latest official forecast and a climatological
error distribution. NHC has learned that many users consult
this table to estimate the chances that a tropical cyclone
will make landfall at one or more of the various intensity
categories. Unfortunately, the current methodology provides
a highly misleading estimate of landfall intensity.

The problem can be seen by considering a storm that is
forecast to be just offshore at 72 hours. A sizable fraction
of the potential scenarios have already encountered land by
that time, and for these over-land scenarios the expected
intensity at 72 hours will be much lower than what would be
expected for a storm that was still over water and about to
make landfall. Even though the table accurately assesses
what the intensity is likely to be at 72 hours, it grossly
underestimates the likely intensity for when the storm comes
ashore.

The table was originally intended to help users assess the
risk of different categories of storms at particular times,
and for storms well away from land the product serves that
function well; however, because of the high likelihood of
misuse for land-threatening storms, and the consequences of
that misuse for the general public, NHC and CPHC are
discontinuing this table until a better procedure to
estimate intensity risk can be developed.


In addition, NWS will no longer provide the stand-alone Intensity
(Maximum Wind Speed) Probability graphic. This graphic contained
the identical information to Table I of the PWS product, which is
being discontinued.


Source: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/news/20140228_s ... hanges.php

Image
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel


Return to “Got a question? I'm listening”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests