Tropical Storm Chris

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#1701 Postby clfenwi » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:46 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:you know you're not getting something that specific out of me yet


Personally, I think if it follows the GDFL, it won't be a USA threat at all, but we'll just have to wait and see. Hopefully the ridge will continue to build in strong.


Did you read any of this, CZ? The GFDL, along with many other models continue to initailize this wrong...Last night the GFS initailized it in the Bahamas


The initialization problems are intensity related, not position.

The 06Z GFDL run had it correctly placed at initialization, but slightly understrength... though much better than anything else out there:

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... hour=000hr

The GFS had it positioned right, but didn't have a closed isobar around it until the 06Z run
00Z:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... hour=000hr

06Z:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... hour=000hr
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#1702 Postby x-y-no » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:49 am

drezee wrote:
x-y-no wrote:GHCC sattelite server is getting real slow ... oh for the good old days when only a few people knew about it. :D


Very true I only have about 2 other sites and I KEEP them to myself now!!! :lol: :lol:


Give! :D


I like RAMSDIS a lot - very nice image quality and I like their IR color scheme - but the trouble is they only update every half hour. GHCC is much more frequent once you get to the close-in 1km resolution view.
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#1703 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:51 am

The ULL out to the NW of Chris is having an effect on the track as is the intensity, depite what any model is depicting. Models don't have real time data streaming or anything. Besides the GFS has NEVER overdone a ridge before now has it :roll: :D
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#1704 Postby curtadams » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:52 am

weunice wrote:OK, dumb question ...
Someone brought up annular so I went and read the Wikipedia article on it and it mentions Epsilon last season. I thought annular hurricanes were typically limited to strong storms? Is it possible for a hurricane to be annular in less intense phases?

Reverse the causality. Annular hurricanes form not because they're strong but because they have virtually perfect atmospheric conditions. The perfect atmospheric conditions also make them strong for their water temps. Epsilon had those near-perfect atmospheric conditions and became annular. It also became about as strong as a hurricane could be over that chilly water, which was Cat 1. Normally annular hurricanes are strong not exactly because they're annular but because the annular-inducing conditions allow them to approach maximum strength for their waters, which is almost always a major hurricane anywhere hurricanes form in the first place. Epsilon formed over quite chilly water that until last year was not expected to form tropical storms much, if ever.
0 likes   

LightningInTheEye
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:43 pm

#1705 Postby LightningInTheEye » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:54 am

FloridaDiver wrote:
Although Chris warrants attention at this time, after reading forecasts and reviewing the overall weather patterns projected by the models, I’m still not convinced that Chris will be a direct hit (Dade/Broward/Palm Beach) for South Florida, I’m thinking more of a Rita-like path from last year, unfortunately closer to the Key’s this time around. I’m afraid my scuba friends down in the Conch Republic will be in evacuation mode yet again by this coming weekend.



"The gfs takes Chris or whatever is left of chris into south florida. 06Z
Nogaps takes chris into south florida also. 00Z"-SouthFloridawx

Since yesterday, most of the computer models have shifted north. I remember yesterday when the forecast path called for Chris to skirt northern Cuba, now it is skirting the Keys...that is a shift of about 100 miles. Unlike Rita, Chris has developed further west, giving more uncertainty to the forecast track.

The ULL to the east of FLA has temporarily weakened the ridge...the next 24 hours will be very critical since this may be the only opportunity for Chris to gain some latitude...after this, the ridge will stabilize taking Chris more WNW (290 degrees) instead of its current intermittent NW wobbles. Chris's position (especially it's lattitude) after these next 24 hours transpire will be critical in determining what if any effect Florida will feel.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#1706 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:58 am

x-y-no wrote:GHCC sattelite server is getting real slow ... oh for the good old days when only a few people knew about it. :D


I thought it was just my Internet. :roll:

By 2010 if this active period continues all the hurricane-related sites will have to upgrade their servers to accomondate 10 times the amount of users today.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#1707 Postby Stephanie » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:04 am

The high pressure that's bringing the heat wave to the East and Midwest is supposed to move offshore by Friday. Wouldn't this affect the steering of the storm?
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#1708 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:06 am

Stephanie wrote:The high pressure that's bringing the heat wave to the East and Midwest is supposed to move offshore by Friday. Wouldn't this affect the steering of the storm?


Not sure, maybe our weakness will come alot sooner. WHo knows?
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

#1709 Postby miamicanes177 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:06 am

Raw T3.9...close to hurricane strength.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#1710 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:08 am

HouTXmetro wrote:
Stephanie wrote:The high pressure that's bringing the heat wave to the East and Midwest is supposed to move offshore by Friday. Wouldn't this affect the steering of the storm?


Not sure, maybe our weakness will come alot sooner. WHo knows?
Jeff Master's said it could move a bit north when that happens, but another ridge moving in behind it should make the storm move WNW again after that.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1711 Postby brunota2003 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:09 am

Stephanie wrote:The high pressure that's bringing the heat wave to the East and Midwest is supposed to move offshore by Friday. Wouldn't this affect the steering of the storm?
doesnt that have to do with the trough moving in? I have read that it is suppose to build back in also...
0 likes   

User avatar
gerrit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: Puerto Rico

#1712 Postby gerrit » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:10 am

wxmann_91 wrote:I thought it was just my Internet. :roll:


You got your own internet? :ggreen:
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

#1713 Postby canegrl04 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:11 am

One thing we've learned from the past two seasons is never say never.I wouldn't rule out Chris becoming a cat 4 or 5 once inside the GOM.In those warm waters they can really crank it up fast :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10152
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

#1714 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:14 am

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html

The bully high is just swatting that ULL rate out of the way to the West. The rate that high is moving in you can almost can see what the GFDL is saying pushing Chris W or even SW, it won't be long before Chris starts to respond. Just an amateur observation.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#1715 Postby stormtruth » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:15 am

gerrit wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:I thought it was just my Internet. :roll:


You got your own internet? :ggreen:


Dang. I'm so jealous. :)
0 likes   

Rainband

#1716 Postby Rainband » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:16 am

Blown_away wrote:http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html

The bully high is just swatting that ULL rate out of the way to the West. The rate that high is moving in you can almost can see what the GFDL is saying pushing Chris W or even SW, it won't be long before Chris starts to respond. Just an amateur observation.
Good observation. :wink: I see what you are saying.
0 likes   

flhurricaneguy
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:21 am

#1717 Postby flhurricaneguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:17 am

i will believe it when i see it.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#1718 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:19 am

Blown_away wrote:http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html

The bully high is just swatting that ULL rate out of the way to the West. The rate that high is moving in you can almost can see what the GFDL is saying pushing Chris W or even SW, it won't be long before Chris starts to respond. Just an amateur observation.


With the ULL weakening slowly and moving a bit faster west-southwestward, and with the ULL much more shallow now (less shearing influence due to this), this could help to decrease the shear in front of Chris and provide favorable divergence for intensification as the two ridges merge to the north of Chris. Where Chris will be positioned when the ULL moves into the east-central Gulf will be a big key on how the ridging/steering/path of Chris will shape up.

Loop

As a side note, banding features are responding by getting better organized. Chris is slowly intensifying.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#1719 Postby curtadams » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:19 am

The 06Z GFS is at least off the drugs, with Chris initialized as a respectable storm. The track is reasonable and verifying - NW now, turning west early tomorrow, crossing the Bahamas, grazing S Fl, and heading out into the gulf. However, it has Chris weakening steadily to a remnant low and I don't see any reason for that. Shear is projected to be moderate-to-low and water temps warm to hot. I don't know how to extract humidities and airtemps from the GFS but I wouldn't expect either to be nasty over the forecast track.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#1720 Postby Stephanie » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:23 am

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:
Stephanie wrote:The high pressure that's bringing the heat wave to the East and Midwest is supposed to move offshore by Friday. Wouldn't this affect the steering of the storm?


Not sure, maybe our weakness will come alot sooner. WHo knows?
Jeff Master's said it could move a bit north when that happens, but another ridge moving in behind it should make the storm move WNW again after that.


Timing is everything then as usual.

Brunota - the front is moving through and pushing the high pressure out.

I guess we'll need to see how strong this new high pressure is.

Thanks for the replies!
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests