ATL: Ex INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146550
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#101 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 06, 2025 6:25 pm

The dead end. :blowup: :sleeping: :sadly:

Tropical Weather Outlook
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
800 PM EDT Sat Sep 6 2025

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of America:

Tropical Atlantic:
A tropical wave over the central tropical Atlantic is producing a
limited amount of shower activity. Development of this system is
not expected while the system moves westward at 10 to 15 mph.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...near 0 percent.
* Formation chance through 7 days...low...near 0 percent.

$$
Forecaster Cangialosi/Kelly
2 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

emeraldislenc
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:49 pm
Location: Emerald Isle NC

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#102 Postby emeraldislenc » Sat Sep 06, 2025 6:32 pm

Major model bust! I guess sometimes it happens!
0 likes   

User avatar
StormWeather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:34 pm

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#103 Postby StormWeather » Sat Sep 06, 2025 6:39 pm

emeraldislenc wrote:Major model bust! I guess sometimes it happens!

Welp, we have completed the biggest bust in awhile.
2 likes   
Just an average cyclone tracker

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Coolcruiseman
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 88
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 8:10 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#104 Postby Coolcruiseman » Sat Sep 06, 2025 6:42 pm

StormWeather wrote:
emeraldislenc wrote:Major model bust! I guess sometimes it happens!

Welp, we have completed the biggest bust in awhile.


Is it a bust though if it taps into the Amazon moisture around 50W and then proceeds to form? Perhaps the models were just extremely early on developing this wave.
1 likes   

emeraldislenc
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:49 pm
Location: Emerald Isle NC

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#105 Postby emeraldislenc » Sat Sep 06, 2025 7:08 pm

Only time will tell!
0 likes   

User avatar
StormWeather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:34 pm

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#106 Postby StormWeather » Sat Sep 06, 2025 7:09 pm

Coolcruiseman wrote:
StormWeather wrote:
emeraldislenc wrote:Major model bust! I guess sometimes it happens!

Welp, we have completed the biggest bust in awhile.


Is it a bust though if it taps into the Amazon moisture around 50W and then proceeds to form? Perhaps the models were just extremely early on developing this wave.

Maybe, maybe not! We will see.
0 likes   
Just an average cyclone tracker

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 133
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#107 Postby sasha_B » Sat Sep 06, 2025 7:12 pm

StormWeather wrote:
emeraldislenc wrote:Major model bust! I guess sometimes it happens!

Welp, we have completed the biggest bust in awhile.

A major bust indeed. I've looked over the annual verification stats for Atlantic Invest areas that have been given a 90% chance of formation on an NHC outlook, and the miss rate is well under 10% - in fact, it's 0% for some years this decade. It happens, but it sure is unusual.
2 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3311
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#108 Postby Teban54 » Sat Sep 06, 2025 8:09 pm

The bizarre thing with 91L is that every single model - all operational models, and both GFS and Euro ensembles - showed nearly unanimous support for days. For most other model busts, either one or two models weren't enthusiastic (often Euro or CMC), or ensemble support had always been lackluster in spite of the operationals.

HMON was probably the only model that never showed development at all. Honorable mention for HAFS-A and HAFS-B, which had weak TS at best for lead times when even ECMWF had strong TS or Cat 1.
3 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146550
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#109 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 06, 2025 8:15 pm

Teban54 wrote:The bizarre thing with 91L is that every single model - all operational models, and both GFS and Euro ensembles - showed nearly unanimous support for days. For most other model busts, either one or two models weren't enthusiastic (often Euro or CMC), or ensemble support had always been lackluster in spite of the operationals.

HMON was probably the only model that never showed development at all. Honorable mention for HAFS-A and HAFS-B, which had weak TS at best for lead times when even ECMWF had strong TS or Cat 1.


Also the Euro AIFS did not had development.
2 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146550
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#110 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 06, 2025 8:31 pm

One of many memes that are running on social media.

Image
4 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6565
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#111 Postby LarryWx » Sun Sep 07, 2025 2:16 am

cycloneye wrote:
Teban54 wrote:The bizarre thing with 91L is that every single model - all operational models, and both GFS and Euro ensembles - showed nearly unanimous support for days. For most other model busts, either one or two models weren't enthusiastic (often Euro or CMC), or ensemble support had always been lackluster in spite of the operationals.

HMON was probably the only model that never showed development at all. Honorable mention for HAFS-A and HAFS-B, which had weak TS at best for lead times when even ECMWF had strong TS or Cat 1.


Also the Euro AIFS did not had development.


Also, another honorable mention is imho earned by both the GFS and UKMET. Please see below.

8/24 12Z JMA has it
8/25 12Z UK first has a TD about when most non-JMA other than GFS first had it; JMA still has it
8/26 0Z UK drops it and GFS still doesn’t have it
8/26 12Z UK/GFS don’t have it. CMC/Euro dropped it. JMA still has it.
8/27 0Z and 12Z: mostly quiet on models except 12Z JMA
8/28 0Z UK gets it back for 1st time after 4 runs without it with a minimal TS but the others have no TC
8/28 12Z UK again has a TS; GFS finally has it and as a H! JMA drops it after 4 days
8/29 0Z UK again has a TS. Don’t have the others.
8/29 12Z: don’t have handy
8/30 0Z UK has just a TD. Don’t see others.
8/30 12Z UK/GFS/Icon have a TD that dissipates quickly. CMC just a weak low. Euro had a TD that moves to off of NC.
8/31 0Z I don’t have
8/31 12Z much more active than 8/30 12Z: Euro MH, GFS H, Icon TS, JMA TD, CMC just a TD that dissipates, UK drops it.
9/1 0Z similar
9/1 12Z strongest yet with H for Euro, GFS, Icon, and CMC; JMA has a TD and UK again has no TC for 3rd run in a row
9/2 0Z UK has it back as a TD, but it dissipates at end
9/2 12Z UK drops it again. Icon has a TS and Euro a MH.
9/3 0Z UK back on with a TD.
9/3 12Z UK has a TS while GFS has a MH into SC.
9/4 0Z UK drops it again. GFS/Euro have an H. Icon still has it.
9/4 12Z: UK nothing again. Euro has an MDR TS that dissipates in Caribbean. JMA has a recurving H.
9/5 0Z: UK/Euro nothing. GFS/CMC still have a TC
9/5 12Z: UK/GFS/CMC/Icon no TC. Euro no TC til a TD in subtropics. JMA still has an H.
9/6 0Z no model has a TC. It’s dead, Jim.

Based on the above, my rankings are the following:

-GFS best for waiting 3-4 days after others to have a TC
-UKMET a close 2nd best for having many runs without it, never having anything stronger than a low end TS, and dropping it earlier than others
-Euro/ICON/CMC near tied for 3rd
-JMA worst for being first and also last with it. In addition, several of the runs had a H.
Last edited by LarryWx on Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:12 am, edited 2 times in total.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2677
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: Ex-INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#112 Postby kevin » Sun Sep 07, 2025 4:52 am

One of the biggest model busts in recent times. Especially since it's a peak season disturbance where even SHIPS and other indicators showed a near-perfect shear and moisture environment. But pretty much all models busted big time.
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: Ex INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#113 Postby otowntiger » Sun Sep 07, 2025 5:05 am

When the models can bust so badly on predicting development that doesn’t happen one might presume that they could very well do the opposite and miss predicting something that does develop. So don’t sleep on something developing out of nowhere that models missed.
3 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23027
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion (20/20)

#114 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 07, 2025 9:31 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Pretty spectacular model fail across the board on this one. Total ghost storm.


Mainly a GFS model fail.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11651
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: Ex INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#115 Postby GCANE » Sun Sep 07, 2025 10:17 am

I dunno.
That dry slot to west of it is filling in pretty good with mid-level moisture in the last 24hrs as it approaches 50W.
We'll see tomorrow if the pros and models are right or not.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11651
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: Ex INVEST 91L - Discussion (0/0)

#116 Postby GCANE » Sun Sep 07, 2025 10:21 am

Actually, convection is firing now in low shear just north of the LL vort.
0 likes   

User avatar
DorkyMcDorkface
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 921
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:32 pm
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion (20/20)

#117 Postby DorkyMcDorkface » Sun Sep 07, 2025 10:53 am

wxman57 wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Pretty spectacular model fail across the board on this one. Total ghost storm.


Mainly a GFS model fail.

And ICON, and CMC, and Euro early on, and Deepmind...GFS was perhaps the most persistent but let's not act like it was a lone wolf here. Most models had some form of development until the last two days or so. I agree with the other poster in that it was pretty much a universal failure this time around
0 likes   
Please note the thougths expressed by this account are solely those of the user and are from a hobbyist perspective. For more comprehensive analysis, consult an actual professional meteorologist or meteorology agency.


Floyd 1999 | Isabel 2003 | Hanna 2008 | Irene 2011 | Sandy 2012 | Isaias 2020


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests