NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Looking at the last 3 eyewall dropsondes from NOAA's rcon showing 138kt, 138kt, 141kt at the surface I think we can safely say those give a good estimation of sustained winds.
With the Air Force having the 151kt surface dropsonde this tells me that there are likely sustained 360° of cat 5 wind at the surface in the eyewall.
I know its common for storms with this kind of structure to have relatively symmetric winds but its still mind boggling to think of the scale. The eyewall is essentially a strong EF-3, to an EF-4 tornado.
I hope the AF recon can do one more eye pass and they still have dropsondes left, iirc this morning they did not have any left for their final eye pass.
Lets pray we have significant weaking and eyewall deterioration before Melissa hits Jamaica.
With the Air Force having the 151kt surface dropsonde this tells me that there are likely sustained 360° of cat 5 wind at the surface in the eyewall.
I know its common for storms with this kind of structure to have relatively symmetric winds but its still mind boggling to think of the scale. The eyewall is essentially a strong EF-3, to an EF-4 tornado.
I hope the AF recon can do one more eye pass and they still have dropsondes left, iirc this morning they did not have any left for their final eye pass.
Lets pray we have significant weaking and eyewall deterioration before Melissa hits Jamaica.
Last edited by Jr0d on Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5

- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I keep hitting the refresh button on GE waiting for the next set of data. It should be in or very close to the eye
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
163 kt FL!
2 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Based on that being on the weaker side, I'd think the next pass might be even higher. Also, if I extrapolate correctly, it's already below 915 and still in the eyewall.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5

- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
163 knot flight level winds on the SW side of the storm.
1 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5

- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
They are in the eye, but it's really hard to separate the data since they are running over the same path over and over.
2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Estimating out the heights, I certainly think this is sub-900 now - perhaps by a fair bit. The last peak run had 2,308m at 697.2 mb (and that was 903 mb).
13 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Keep in mind that this AF plane's extrap pressure on the last pass was too low: it was extrapolating 903 mb, when two dropsonades from different aircraft confirmed 907 mb.
So hold your breath once you see the pressure, until the dropsonade confirms it.
So hold your breath once you see the pressure, until the dropsonade confirms it.
9 likes
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5

- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Was kinda waiting for a Superman fly by with that music...lol
3 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:Keep in mind that this AF plane's extrap pressure on the last pass was too low: it was extrapolating 903 mb, when two dropsonades from different aircraft confirmed 907 mb.
So hold your breath once you see the pressure, until the dropsonade confirms it.
Or the AF plane could just not broadcast extrap pressure and we can wait for the dropsonde apparently.
3 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5

- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I know there's reliability questions but 163 knot SFMR is beyond impressive.
1 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Lolll we had no extrap pressure this time


4 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Pressure not calculated. However, using the previous set and the decrease in heights, that would be an extrapolated 899 mb. Now we wait for the dropsonde.
12 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Travorum wrote:Teban54 wrote:Keep in mind that this AF plane's extrap pressure on the last pass was too low: it was extrapolating 903 mb, when two dropsonades from different aircraft confirmed 907 mb.
So hold your breath once you see the pressure, until the dropsonade confirms it.
Or the AF plane could just not broadcast extrap pressure and we can wait for the dropsonde apparently.
Anyway, NE quad has 162 kt FL, similar to SW. Some other recent passes also had surprisingly high FL winds in the SW quad as well.
2 likes
- InfernoFlameCat
- Category 5

- Posts: 2126
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: Buford, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Such a mixed bag of feelings right now. I am both in awe, and terror. Its a difficult watch.
Each frame, the storm keeps improving. Prayers for Jamaica
Each frame, the storm keeps improving. Prayers for Jamaica
3 likes
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148285
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
The pressure did not work so wait for the dropsonde.
2 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Now, what to go with for the intensity? The dropsonde earlier confirmed a spot peak of 151 kt, while the flight-level winds support about 150 kt. I'd go with 155 kt, but a case could be made for 160 kt as well.
9 likes
- InfernoFlameCat
- Category 5

- Posts: 2126
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: Buford, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
When is the next plane?
0 likes
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests








