Grounded teen killed family before going to prom

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Janice
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4564
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 6:14 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Grounded teen killed family before going to prom

#1 Postby Janice » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:20 am

SOUTH BEND, Indiana (AP) -- A jury convicted a man Friday of killing his father, stepmother and two stepsisters 17 years ago inside their church parsonage home so he could attend some high school prom events.

The St. Joseph County jury found Jeffrey Pelley, now 34, guilty on four counts of murder after deliberating more than 25 hours since Wednesday. Pelley faces up to 260 years in prison when he is sentenced September 15.

Prosecutors accused Pelley, a high school senior at the time, of using a shotgun to kill his father, the Rev. Robert Pelley; stepmother, Dawn; and stepsisters, Janel, 8, and Jolene, 6, in April 1989 at their home next to the Olive Branch Church of the United Brethren in Lakeville, about 10 miles south of South Bend.

Investigators said Pelley was angry because his father had grounded him for stealing and would allow him to attend only the prom dance, causing him to miss a prom dinner, a bowling alley party and an outing the next day at an amusement park outside Chicago.

Pelley was not charged in the deaths until August 2002, when authorities reinterpreted evidence. Pelley was living in Dade City, Florida, when he was arrested.

Prosecutors alleged Pelley shot his family members on the evening of the prom, disposed of the shotgun and shells, took a shower, put his clothes in the washer and left for the prom.

Pelley's defense attorneys argued there wasn't enough time for him to have done all that and still make it to the LaVille High School prom.

They also said no one could commit such a gruesome attack and still act "normal" during the prom events, as his friends testified during the trial.

The defense also questioned the decision by investigators not to look for fingerprints at the crime scene.

Police officers testified during the trial that they didn't think they would find any usable prints and they thought it would be a waste of time because Pelley was their main suspect.

The shotgun used in the killings was never found.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#2 Postby TexasStooge » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:27 am

Investigators said Pelley was angry because his father had grounded him for stealing and would allow him to attend only the prom dance


He should be happy that he's going to prom at all.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
tomboudreau
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1869
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:07 pm
Location: Carnegie, PA
Contact:

#3 Postby tomboudreau » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:48 am

This happend some 17 years ago...they just got a trial and jury conviction.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#4 Postby TexasStooge » Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:14 pm

Maybe when he's sentenced, he's gonna think about why he did what he did just to get his ways.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#5 Postby Lindaloo » Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:39 pm

What evidence could they possibly have? No gun, no time line, no fingerprints. Possibly no DNA either?

That article does not say why he was found guilty other than he was the main susoect.
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#6 Postby george_r_1961 » Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:45 pm

Lindaloo wrote:What evidence could they possibly have? No gun, no time line, no fingerprints. Possibly no DNA either?

That article does not say why he was found guilty other than he was the main susoect.


There was obviously enoigh evidence for a jury to convict him. The article didnt really go into detail unfortunatley.

The jury deliberated 25 hours, a longggg time. For all we know he might have made incriminating or conflicting statements to police.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#7 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:04 pm

sounds like this was a case of a jury going with guilty until proven innocent, absed upon the article, which may occur more than we think, and is why one should always ask for a judge (a professional) to decide ones fate
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests