BREAKING NEWS -- MO New Concealed Weapon Law On Hold!

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

BREAKING NEWS -- MO New Concealed Weapon Law On Hold!

#1 Postby wx247 » Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:11 pm

ST. LOUIS -- Missouri's controversial law allowing more people to legally carry concealed weapons won't take effect on Saturday as scheduled. In St. Louis on Friday afternoon, Circuit Judge Steven Ohmer issued a temporary restraining order that delays the new law until the state's Supreme Court can determine if it's constitutional.

The plaintiffs that sued the state over the law have to pay a $250,000 bond to cover businesses' potential losses from the delay. However, Ohmer said the law would have caused irreparable harm had it taken effect on Saturday.

The plaintiffs are a group of public officials, members of the St. Louis Clergy Coalition and the non-profit Institute for Peace and Justice. Their lawyers, Burton Newman and Richard Miller, cited a provision of the Bill of Rights of the Missouri Constitution. It says the right to bear arms “shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.''

The law, which the Legislature passed over Gov. Bob Holden’s veto, would let any person over age 23, after paying a $100 fee and passing a background check and a training course, receive a permit from his or her county sheriff to carry a concealed gun. It also would allows anyone age 21 or older to conceal a legally obtained gun in a vehicle without need of a permit.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#2 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:16 pm

Leave it to the lawyers to find a technicality. So does that mean that the police officers are not supposed to be wearing guns? Missouri should have amended that in their constitution years ago. The Supreme Court will over turn that one, because of the simple fact that the law contradicts itself.
0 likes   

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#3 Postby streetsoldier » Fri Oct 10, 2003 11:19 pm

Lindaloo,

The Missouri Legislature may be (thank God!) conservative, but the judicial here is all Democratic...thanx to the late, unlamented Mel Carnahan and his successor, the Honorable (?) Bob "Sponge-Bob", or "One-Term Bob" Holden in the Governor's Mansion.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#4 Postby Lindaloo » Sat Oct 11, 2003 8:01 am

"the Honorable (?) Bob "Sponge-Bob", or "One-Term Bob" Holden at one"


LOL Bill!!
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests