UM...Is any of this true about BUSH??? I Sincerely Hope not

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#61 Postby Lindaloo » Wed Oct 29, 2003 9:28 pm

GREAT POST stormchazer!!! You are right on!
0 likes   

User avatar
sunnyday
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:16 pm

Busy

#62 Postby sunnyday » Wed Oct 29, 2003 9:35 pm

Jara,
I, too, respect your right to express your views. Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormchazer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2462
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Contact:

Re: Busy

#63 Postby stormchazer » Wed Oct 29, 2003 9:45 pm

sunnyday wrote:Jara,
I, too, respect your right to express your views. Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.


Yep...can't argue politics... :P
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged

Opinions my own.

User avatar
stormy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Hoover, Al

#64 Postby stormy » Thu Oct 30, 2003 12:19 am

Right on stormchaser. u hit the button on the nose. yes i see a business management or economist in the near future.
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

Re: Bush

#65 Postby j » Thu Oct 30, 2003 9:27 am

sunnyday wrote:I don't think Clinton inherited a booming economy, to say the least. And, our economy is in bad shape now, for sure. Look at all the stock market losses.



Let me dispute this with some hard cold facts!

My personal 401K performance is as follows:


Month ending 9/30/2003: -3.09%
Quater to date: 9.02%
Year to date: 23.67%
Since 7/1/2002 (annualized): 4.52%

Now....as you can see..the Stock Market is doing just fine. Of special note here is my performance since inception (4.52%), since this includes several consecutive months of negative gains. My only "saving" grace is that I wasn't in the plan in 2001 when the market was in a tailspin post Clinton, not to mention 911.

2003 has been a great year for Stocks...I don't know how you can possibly dispute that!

A little more info to back up my claims:

I have changed my contributions to 80% for the Small Cap Growth Fund, and 20% for the Large Cap Growth Fund.

Year to date, Sm Cap Growth is @ 31.61%, and a booming Annualized 1 Year return of 36.31%.

Year to date, Lg Cap Growth is @ 25.74%, and Annualized 1 year return of 34.93%.

What I won't waste my time showing you is the performance of these funds in the latter years of the Clinton Administration and the early Bush inherited economy years. And....of course there is 911. There was NO 911 for the Bill Clinton's economy to worry about.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#66 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Oct 30, 2003 1:26 pm

There is no argument with those figures j.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#67 Postby TexasStooge » Thu Oct 30, 2003 1:37 pm

Stephanie wrote:Uh, no comment...

That's what I'd say.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#68 Postby j » Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:45 pm

as long as there is a captive audiaence for the doom and gloom philosophy..let me share this with you..just off the wire from the AP:

WASHINGTON — The economy grew at a scorching 7.2 percent annual rate in the third quarter in the strongest pace in nearly two decades. Consumers spent with abandon and businesses ramped up investment, compelling new evidence of an economic resurgence.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormchazer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2462
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Contact:

Re: Bush

#69 Postby stormchazer » Thu Oct 30, 2003 3:09 pm

j wrote:
sunnyday wrote:I don't think Clinton inherited a booming economy, to say the least. And, our economy is in bad shape now, for sure. Look at all the stock market losses.



Let me dispute this with some hard cold facts!

My personal 401K performance is as follows:


Month ending 9/30/2003: -3.09%
Quater to date: 9.02%
Year to date: 23.67%
Since 7/1/2002 (annualized): 4.52%

Now....as you can see..the Stock Market is doing just fine. Of special note here is my performance since inception (4.52%), since this includes several consecutive months of negative gains. My only "saving" grace is that I wasn't in the plan in 2001 when the market was in a tailspin post Clinton, not to mention 911.

2003 has been a great year for Stocks...I don't know how you can possibly dispute that!

A little more info to back up my claims:

I have changed my contributions to 80% for the Small Cap Growth Fund, and 20% for the Large Cap Growth Fund.

Year to date, Sm Cap Growth is @ 31.61%, and a booming Annualized 1 Year return of 36.31%.

Year to date, Lg Cap Growth is @ 25.74%, and Annualized 1 year return of 34.93%.

What I won't waste my time showing you is the performance of these funds in the latter years of the Clinton Administration and the early Bush inherited economy years. And....of course there is 911. There was NO 911 for the Bill Clinton's economy to worry about.


Thank you J.
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged

Opinions my own.

User avatar
sunnyday
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:16 pm

Bush

#70 Postby sunnyday » Thu Oct 30, 2003 5:18 pm

My absolute last comment on this J, you are so right. There was no 911 under Clinton.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#71 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Oct 30, 2003 5:21 pm

You missed his point sunnyday. No, there was not a 9/11, but the economy was on the boom until 9/11. There was no 9/11 under Clinton so people could really see who got the economy on it's feet by the previous Bush administration while Clinton reaped the benefits.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunnyday
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:16 pm

Bush

#72 Postby sunnyday » Thu Oct 30, 2003 5:23 pm

I didn't miss the point. Read my post again.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#73 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Oct 30, 2003 5:29 pm

My reply made sense didn't it? lol.
0 likes   

User avatar
j
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:21 pm

#74 Postby j » Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:47 am

since you agreed with me, yes it made sense to me :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#75 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:17 am

j wrote:since you agreed with me, yes it made sense to me :)


LOL!!
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests