J. Jackson poses topless!

sunnyday · #1 Postby **sunnyday** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 5:33 pm

This woman is an exhibitionist and too old to be showing, no matter what plastic surgery can do for an almost 40 year old body. She is posing topless for her new cd that comes out in March.

azsnowman · #2 Postby **azsnowman** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 5:53 pm

Some how doesn't suprize me, who's next in that WACKO family, Tito shows some (edit)

Dennis

Lindaloo · #3 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:02 pm

LOL Dennis.

David · #4 Postby **David** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:10 pm

Lol,,, heard that on Jay Leno last night. :roll:

GalvestonDuck · #5 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:35 pm

She did it years ago on the cover of Rolling Stone. Of course, she had Lenny Kravitz's hands over her (I think it was him), so it wasn't truly "topless" and yet it was.

blizzard · #6 Postby **blizzard** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:42 pm

I just don't see why this is making such headlines. I mean she posed topless at the superbowl too...

#7 Postby **streetsoldier** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:48 pm

Frankly, I don't give a tit. :roll:

blizzard · #8 Postby **blizzard** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:49 pm

streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.

#9 Postby **Stephanie** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 8:10 pm

streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.

Good one Bill!

Yeah, I'm sure that she was REALLY SORRY! :roll:

Miss Mary · #10 Postby **Miss Mary** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:17 pm

streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.

Bill!!! This post is right up there with Ed's way back when on TWC boards.....remember his? Well anyway, yours made me almost choke on my tea!!!! LOL

Mary

timNms · #11 Postby **timNms** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:27 pm

The Superbowl was free advertisement for her new cd??? LOL

#12 Postby **Pburgh** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:33 pm

Bill, ROTFLMAO. I'm glad she doesn't go bottomless cause I think we would be shocked at her big set of balls. OOPS Did I really say that???? Sorry

blizzard · #13 Postby **blizzard** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:33 pm

timNms wrote:The Superbowl was free advertisement for her new cd??? LOL

That, and she probably is hoping to get a spread in Playboy, which will probably happen. They seem to go for the scandalous. Remember Jenna and Heidi from the survivor show, they bared themselves on the show and Playboy gave them some exposure also.

#14 Postby **streetsoldier** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:34 am

..."(she is) hoping to get a spread in Playboy"...you have no idea what horrors that phrase conjures up. :eek:

#15 Postby **coriolis** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 7:52 am

streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.

No, but she does.

So is she disqualified as a "character" witness at her brother's trial?

#16 Postby **streetsoldier** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:57 am

From what I have heard, the Nation of Islam won't let MJ's family anywhere mear him...if Janet does attend the court proceedings, it will only be to keep "a-breast "of the situation.

#17 Postby **coriolis** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:10 am

Ouch.

That's weird. Under Islamic law, wouldn't MJ be up for a good old fashioned stoning for what he (is alleged) to have done?

furluvcats · #18 Postby **furluvcats** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:30 am

Bill, you've got me rolling!

She's just trying to revive and long gone career, and this PR is better than no PR in her book I'm sure...when was the last time she stole the spotlight from her brother Michael, can you remember?

TexasStooge · #19 Postby **TexasStooge** » Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:01 pm

No surprise.

J. Jackson poses topless!

J. Jackson poses topless!

Who is online