Breaking News---Martha Stewart

[bfez1]

Judge dismisses securities fraud charge against Martha Stewart

[Stephanie]

That was quick!!! I thought that they were still presenting arguments. Based on what grounds?

[TexasStooge]

I kinda figured that'll happen.

[Suzi Q]

Despite the fact we are related-THAT IS JUST SO WRONG. Who says you can't buy a judge and jury?

[Stephanie]

Here's a link;

http://msnbc.msn.com/ID/4362224

Judge dismisses major charge against Stewart
Securites fraud carried maximum 10-year sentence
Martha Stewart arrives at federal court in New York Friday. The judge presiding over the case dismissed the securities fraud charge against the domestic diva.
The Associated Press
Updated: 12:33 p.m. ET Feb. 27, 2004NEW YORK - A federal judge on Friday threw out the most serious charge against Martha Stewart, an accusation that she deceived investors in her media empire by claiming that her sale of ImClone Systems stock had been proper.

advertisement

The decision by U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum came just five days before jurors are expected to begin deciding the case against the celebrity homemaker and her stockbroker.

“I have concluded that no reasonable juror can find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant lied for the purpose of influencing the market for the securities of her company,” Cedarbaum wrote.

‘I have concluded that no reasonable juror can find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant lied for the purpose of influencing the market for the securities of her company.’


— Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum
U.S. District Judge


Stewart still faces four criminal counts — conspiracy, obstruction of justice and two counts of lying to investigators. The judge declined to throw out any of the five counts against broker Peter Bacanovic.

The securities fraud count carried a potential prison sentence of 10 years and a $1 million fine. The remaining four counts against Stewart each carry a prison sentence of five years and a $250,000 fine.

The securities fraud charge had been criticized by Stewart’s lawyers as an unprecedented violation of the First Amendment, and the judge herself had referred to it as “novel” and “problematic.”

It accused Stewart of trying to prop up the stock price of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia when she claimed in 2002 that she had sold ImClone because of a deal with Bacanovic to dump the stock when it fell to $60. Stewart personally stood to lose $30 million for every dollar her stock price dropped.

The government claims that was a lie, and that Stewart sold instead because Bacanovic sent word to her that her friend, ImClone founder Sam Waksal, was frantically trying to sell his ImClone shares.

Cedarbaum issued her decision just as lawyers in the case began meeting with her behind closed doors to discuss the instructions the judge will give jurors when they begin deliberating next week.

Details of Martha’s stock sale
— Martha Stewart averted at least $51,222 in losses with her well-timed sale of Imclone Systems stock.
— She sold all 3,928 of her shares on Dec. 27, 2001, at $58.43 each, for a total of about $229,500.
— On Dec. 31, the first trading day after the Food and Drug Administration announced it had rejected Imclone’s application for a cancer drug, ImClone opened at $45.39.
— Exactly how much money Stewart may have made on the stock is not clear; the Securities and Exchange Commission did not require Stewart to disclose the purchase price of her stock, since she did not own a large enough stake.
Source: Associated Press




The decision put a charge into Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia stock, sending its shares up $1.24, more than 9 percent, to $14.34 in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

A spokeswoman for Stewart did not immediately return a call, and Stewart herself was in the meeting with lawyers and the judge. A spokesman for federal prosecutors did not immediately return a call for comment.

The securities-fraud charge focused on three statements in 2002 — one on June 6 by her lawyer, and two on June 12 and June 18 by Stewart herself.

Each time, the $60 agreement was given as the reason for Stewart’s stock sale. Stewart’s lawyers said she was just trying to clear her name, but the government contended that she was spreading a lie with deliberate purpose.

The judge conceded that Stewart had a motive — her heavy investment in her own company — to deceive investors. But she said the government had not sufficiently shown an intent by Stewart to defraud investors.

“Here, the evidence and inferences the government presents are simply too weak to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal intent,” the judge wrote in a 23-page ruling.

Closing arguments in the trial are scheduled to begin Monday and last well into Tuesday. The jury is expected to receive its instructions and begin deliberating on Wednesday.

Stewart’s lawyers still must convince the jury that she was not lying to investigators when she told them in 2002 that she had no memory of being tipped about Waksal.

The government’s star witness in the trial was Douglas Faneuil, the former Merrill Lynch & Co. assistant who claims he gave Stewart the tip about Waksal on orders from Bacanovic, his boss.

Stewart’s personal assistant also testified that Stewart ordered her to change a computerized record of a phone message Bacanovic left for her on the day she sold ImClone stock — then ordered the assistant to change it back.

[GalvestonDuck]

She's not totally off the hook. The judge said that prosecutors failed to present enough evidence to convict her of the most serious charge. But she still faces charges of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of lying to investigators.

[GalvestonDuck]

LOL! Yeah, what Steph just said. You were a bit faster on the draw.

[wx247]

I am not surprised. I don't think there was any real substantial proof that she presented statements to keep her Omni Media Stock from dropping. Not saying that she didn't do it, but that the evidence just wasn't there.

[Lindaloo]

The jury is still out on the other 4 charges. Stay tuned.