Analyst Says al-Qaida May Attack by Sea

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
BEER980
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Ocala, Fl
Contact:

Analyst Says al-Qaida May Attack by Sea

#1 Postby BEER980 » Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:53 pm

Analyst Says al-Qaida May Attack by Sea
By D'ARCY DORAN Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press - 03/17/2004
SINGAPORE


The al-Qaida terror network likely is planning an unprecedented maritime attack, hitting targets on land with ships carrying chemical, biological or dirty bomb weapons, a defense analyst said Wednesday. The terrorist network could easily exploit weaknesses in shipping companies' crew selection procedures by planting sleeper agents on vessels to eventually seize them, said Michael Richardson, a senior researcher at Singapore's Institute of Southeast Asian Studies who writes extensively on Asian security issues.

"The al-Qaida network has serious maritime terrorism plans," Richardson told diplomats, academics and defense officials at the institute. Singapore's Coordinating Security Minister Tony Tan has warned repeatedly since November that there is a "very serious" risk of terrorists using ships to attack the city-state. Such an attack could have come sooner if it wasn't so difficult to procure a nuclear device and if al-Qaida's operations chief, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, and its head of naval operations, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri hadn't been arrested, Richardson said.

"Sooner or later, al-Qaida or one of its affiliates will make and detonate a radiological bomb, whether it's in a ship or a shipping container," he said.

"If you look at how relatively easy it is to get the materials, put them together and make them go bang, and look at the motivation, terrorism is going to get bigger and it's going to get worse," he added. A prime target would be Singapore - or any of the world's 40 largest port cities - or key international shipping straits and canals, Richardson said. Al-Qaida operatives could easily get jobs on ships by buying fake seafarer credentials, which are widely available, he said.

But al-Qaida's past pattern of disciplined, coordinated attacks makes it unlikely that the network will risk hijacking a ship, or seeking help from pirates outside of its circle of zealots, he said. The network has already demonstrated its willingness to attack sea targets with suicide attacks on the destroyer USS Cole in 2000 and the French oil tanker Limburg in 2002, Richardson said. In both attacks, suicide bombers detonated small explosive-laden boats next to vessels off the coast of Yemen.

Singapore, a close Washington ally, also claims to have foiled a plot by the al-Qaida linked Jemaah Islamiyah terror group to blow up, among other Western targets, a U.S. Naval facility in the island nation. The city-state has detained 37 terror suspects since 2001. Jemaah Islamiyah is also blamed for the 2002 Bali bombings that killed 202 and an August 2003 suicide bombing at the J.W. Marriott Hotel in Jakarta that killed 12.

Source
0 likes   

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#2 Postby streetsoldier » Thu Mar 18, 2004 4:29 am

Remember, there are 50-200 unaccounted-for ships out there, and it is safe to believe that Al Qaida has SOME of them.

I, for one, am happy to live INLAND... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
BEER980
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Ocala, Fl
Contact:

#3 Postby BEER980 » Thu Mar 18, 2004 8:05 am

All they need to do is have a somewhat organized atack on our top 10 ports. Shut down those ports for a few weeks and see what panic ensues. Only 5% of shipping containers are ever checked. Now if you want to really wnat to cripple us then take down the national grid at the same time.
0 likes   

Rainband

#4 Postby Rainband » Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:15 pm

Lets just give them some more ideas. The press hurts more than it helps sometimes IMHO :roll: :roll: :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
CaptinCrunch
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8731
Age: 57
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:33 pm
Location: Kennedale, TX (Tarrant Co.)

#5 Postby CaptinCrunch » Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:21 pm

All we need to do is use our Sub fleet to patrol the major sea ports and sink any boat that refuses to be borderd and checked.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#6 Postby Anonymous » Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:29 pm

In order to win the war on terror, we have to be on the offensive. Defending the entire homeland won't work.
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#7 Postby azsnowman » Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:56 pm

Rainband wrote:Lets just give them some more ideas. The press hurts more than it helps sometimes IMHO :roll: :roll: :roll:


"AMEN BROTHER!" PLEASE pick up a copy of Readers Digest, it'll tell ya how to DEAL with the MEDIA and their HYPE!

Dennis :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
BEER980
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Ocala, Fl
Contact:

#8 Postby BEER980 » Thu Mar 18, 2004 9:16 pm

CaptinCrunch wrote:All we need to do is use our Sub fleet to patrol the major sea ports and sink any boat that refuses to be borderd and checked.


That would be the last thing we need to do. Even if we had enough resources to do it.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests