Do you approve of how Pres. Bush is handling the Iraq abuse

#1 Postby **bfez1** » Tue May 11, 2004 12:05 pm

Opinions, please!

rainstorm · #2 Postby **rainstorm** » Tue May 11, 2004 6:05 pm

too much whining and apologizing

Lindaloo · #3 Postby **Lindaloo** » Tue May 11, 2004 6:13 pm

I agree Helen but I voted YES.

southerngale · #4 Postby **southerngale** » Tue May 11, 2004 6:13 pm

For those who said no, why do you disapprove? I'm just wondering if it's like what Rainstorm said and he shouldn't have apologized or something else.

rainstorm · #5 Postby **rainstorm** » Tue May 11, 2004 6:29 pm

Lindaloo wrote:I agree Helen but I voted YES.

he needs to get out there and defend the military
GO TO MILITARY BASES!!!!

chadtm80 · #6 Postby **chadtm80** » Tue May 11, 2004 6:31 pm

I realy dont understand How BUSH of all people gets labled as not supporting the Military.. I realy dont

Lindaloo · #7 Postby **Lindaloo** » Tue May 11, 2004 6:33 pm

He is defending the military Helen. He also stood by Rumsfeld.

stormchazer · #8 Postby **stormchazer** » Tue May 11, 2004 8:21 pm

He needs to start asking Congress what they knew! He is not supporting the military strong enough!

#9 Postby **azskyman** » Tue May 11, 2004 8:34 pm

I'm saddened that he felt compelled to apologize on Arab TV. In the weeks to come, he will discover, the world will see, that this is not the action of some unwatched and untrained military folks...but a deep-seeded philosophy of a military that has defended this country for decades. People all the way to the top will find themselves trying to explain that without the freedom to use psychological warfare to its fullest extent, we may be powerless to do the very thing our citizens are demanding.

Find ways to get the kind of intelligence that would have prevented 9/11.

Rumsfeld will be compelled to resign for having set the President to be the fall guy. And the pedestal the President and this country stands on will be considerably less proud.

#10 Postby **Stephanie** » Tue May 11, 2004 8:35 pm

Actually, I voted "Yes". I think that we still need to hold ourselves to a higher standard and I think that the apology was good - even though the Arabic nations look at this as a "weakness". I think it's apart of what Democracy is all about, which is what we are trying to promote over there to begin with. Unfortunately, no, we will not get an apology from those that beheaded that young man today. There's still alot of work to be done over there and I think now we need to get down and dirty and finish our job.

rainstorm · #11 Postby **rainstorm** » Tue May 11, 2004 8:50 pm

Lindaloo wrote:He is defending the military Helen. He also stood by Rumsfeld.

rumsfield is one man. he needs to go to every military base in the world and thank the troops. plus, it would be a great re-election strategy

Rainband · #12 Postby **Rainband** » Tue May 11, 2004 9:19 pm

rainstorm wrote:
Lindaloo wrote:He is defending the military Helen. He also stood by Rumsfeld.

rumsfield is one man. he needs to go to every military base in the world and thank the troops. plus, it would be a great re-election strategy

yea..with a gold bounty on his head :roll:

Be for real. Our troops know Bush is their biggest supporter

rainstorm · #13 Postby **rainstorm** » Wed May 12, 2004 5:56 am

right now i think the troops need to see their boss

j · #14 Postby j » Wed May 12, 2004 7:39 am

voted yes, however... WAY too much apologizing...a little is ok, but lets not over do it.

Guest · #15 Postby **Guest** » Wed May 12, 2004 2:12 pm

I voted no because I don't think President Bush needed to apologize. This is war! If we beheaded someone, then an apology would be warranted. But not for this.
...Jennifer...

Do you approve of how Pres. Bush is handling the Iraq abuse

Do you approve of how Pres. Bush is handling the Iraq abuse scandal?

Do you approve of how Pres. Bush is handling the Iraq abuse

Who is online