You have to be kidding me

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
chadtm80

You have to be kidding me

#1 Postby chadtm80 » Wed Jul 14, 2004 8:40 am

Posted on Wed, Jul. 14, 2004

PENNSYLVANIA


Man tells docs he drinks, loses driver license

A Pennsylvania man is fighting to get back his driver's license, revoked after he told his doctors he drinks several beers a day.

By MARTHA RAFFAELE

Associated Press


HARRISBURG, Pa. - A man who told his doctors that he drinks more than a six-pack of beer per day is now fighting to get his driver's license back because the physicians apparently reported him to the state.

Keith Emerich, 44, said Tuesday that he disclosed his drinking habit in February to doctors who were treating him at a hospital for an irregular heartbeat.

''I told them it was over a six-pack a day. It wasn't good for me -- I'm not going to lie,'' Emerich said in a telephone interview from his home in Lebanon, about 30 miles east of Harrisburg.

Emerich received a notice from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation in April that his license was being revoked effective May 6 for medical reasons related to substance abuse. He has petitioned a judge to restore the license, and a hearing has been set for July 29.

STATE LAW APPLIES

A state law dating to the 1960s requires doctors to report any physical or mental impairments that could compromise a patient's ability to drive safely, PennDOT spokeswoman Joan Nissley said. She said she could not discuss the details of Emerich's case because of confidentiality requirements that also protect the doctor's identity.

The law requires revocation of the license until the driver can prove he is competent to drive.

Emerich said his heart problem has prompted him to limit his beer drinking to weekends. Aside from a drunken-driving conviction when he was 21, Emerich, a pressman at a print shop who lives alone, said he has a clean driving record and does not drink and drive.

''What I do in the privacy of my own home is none of PennDOT's business,'' he said.

Asked whether he considered his client to be alcoholic, Horace Ehrgood, Emerich's attorney, said: ``It depends on what your definition is.''

''He's been able to go to work, and he's got a heck of a nice work record. He's been able to function in all other avenues of life,'' the lawyer said.

Pennsylvania's transportation agency receives about 40,000 medical reports and revokes 5,000 to 6,000 licenses a year but does not keep any statistics on its reasons for doing so, Nissley said. She also said she did not know how many revocations get appealed.

SIX STATES' LAWS

Pennsylvania is one of six states that require doctors to report motorists with medical conditions that could affect their driving, according to the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators. The others are California, Delaware, Oregon, Nevada and New Jersey. All other states and the District of Columbia allow doctors to submit reports on a voluntary basis.

Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a watchdog group, said cases like Emerich's highlight a tension between medical privacy and public safety.

Repeat After Me:

No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
No Doc I Don't Drink
0 likes   

Josephine96

#2 Postby Josephine96 » Wed Jul 14, 2004 8:43 am

Good for the doctors.. bad for the drinker lol
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#3 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 14, 2004 8:47 am

I have to agree with the docs on this one, although the law seems a little far fetched to me. Health care facilities are required to report gunshot wounds to police departments, animal bites and diagnoses of certain diseases (HIV, STD's, etc) to the health department and/or CDC, and abuse or neglect to child/adult protective services.

If it's the law to report his alcohol abuse, which could impair his ability to drive, than I feel they obeyed the law. He claims he doesn't drink and drive. But that doesn't change the fact that it is an impairment if he does drive.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#4 Postby Stephanie » Wed Jul 14, 2004 9:50 am

If he had a car accident while driving under the influence that would be one thing. We have laws for that. Pennsylvania has "State Liquor stores". Liquor, beer, is only available in that state through them. :roll:

I agree with the patient, what he does in the privacy of his own home is his own business.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#5 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 14, 2004 9:52 am

So, if he has seizures, but has yet to have one while driving, does that make it okay for him to continue driving?
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#6 Postby opera ghost » Wed Jul 14, 2004 9:54 am

There's a difference Duck- you can't control when seizures happen... you CAN control whether you drive while under the influence. This guy has a problem with alcohol... but a clean work and driving record.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#7 Postby Stephanie » Wed Jul 14, 2004 9:57 am

That's a medical condition that person has no control over when and where it could happen. Casual drinking in your own home is under your control, you know the consequences of going on the road while driving under the influence. Different scenerios in my mind. What's next - can't smoke in your house? Are we going to allow the government to take over our lives? Part of the reason why, IMHO, we have so many darn lawsuits is because we've taken away common sense and responsibility through legislation.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#8 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:02 am

Yet, both intoxication and epilepsy (or other neurological problems that cause seizures) are diagnosable health problems that can impair a person's driving. Even if it hasn't been a problem in the past, I still agree with the docs for reporting it.
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#9 Postby wx247 » Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:02 am

I think the problem here may be the state and not the doctor. Nowhere does it state that the doctor reccomended the lisence being taken away. He was just following state laws. It is the state's fault for not investigating further to see when he was drinking and if this was a substance abuse problem that was worthy of revoking his driving privileges.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#10 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:04 am

Exactly. Like I said, I'm backing the docs who followed the law.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#11 Postby Stephanie » Wed Jul 14, 2004 11:14 am

I should've been clearer - I was arguing against the law, not the doctor following the law. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Pburgh
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5403
Age: 80
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:36 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

#12 Postby Pburgh » Wed Jul 14, 2004 11:35 am

So, let me get this clear, if someone is taking antidepressents, sleeping pills, pain pills, muscle relaxants or any other medication that may impair one's driving ability, is that also reportable with possible liscense suspension?? What a screwy law. I'm glad I don't live in Pennsylvania. ahhhhhh Oops, I do live here. Well I'm glad I never go to the Dr.lol
0 likes   

User avatar
CaluWxBill
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 577
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 8:31 pm
Location: Southwest PA
Contact:

#13 Postby CaluWxBill » Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:09 pm

Pburgh wrote:So, let me get this clear, if someone is taking antidepressents, sleeping pills, pain pills, muscle relaxants or any other medication that may impair one's driving ability, is that also reportable with possible liscense suspension?? What a screwy law. I'm glad I don't live in Pennsylvania. ahhhhhh Oops, I do live here. Well I'm glad I never go to the Dr.lol


Yep, you have to be careful what you tell your doctor lol.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#14 Postby GalvestonDuck » Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:26 pm

Yeah, by all means, whatever you do, don't tell him what illicit, over-the-counter, or prescription (but not yours) drugs you've been taking when you go to the ER and have to be rushed to surgery because you were an idiot and sliced half your arm off with a chainsaw. It's always best to make the people who hold your life in their hands think that you are clean and that your vital signs are not responding to their treatment for reasons other than the fact that you have drugs in your system. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Pburgh
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5403
Age: 80
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:36 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

#15 Postby Pburgh » Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:39 pm

The point I guess I'm trying to make is ----- Do the doctors who prescribe all of these medications report this to the State??? One of my employee's has a dentist who prescribes oxycontin for a toothache. I wonder if that's reported.
0 likes   

Guest

#16 Postby Guest » Wed Jul 14, 2004 1:15 pm

Pburgh wrote:The point I guess I'm trying to make is ----- Do the doctors who prescribe all of these medications report this to the State??? One of my employee's has a dentist who prescribes oxycontin for a toothache. I wonder if that's reported.


I know more than 1 person who has died from oxycontin. If I'm not mistaken, it's equated as being the synthetic version of heroin. I can't believe someone would prescribe it for a toothache!

Back to the original discussion, I think it was wrong to suspend his license. The average American consumes alcohol too. Maybe not in excess, but it is still consumed. How do they differentiate between the moderate and the excessive user? Doesn't sound like a good law to me. Just taking away some more of our civil liberties...
...Jennifer...
0 likes   

chadtm80

#17 Postby chadtm80 » Wed Jul 14, 2004 1:26 pm

mrschad wrote:
Pburgh wrote:The point I guess I'm trying to make is ----- Do the doctors who prescribe all of these medications report this to the State??? One of my employee's has a dentist who prescribes oxycontin for a toothache. I wonder if that's reported.


I know more than 1 person who has died from oxycontin. If I'm not mistaken, it's equated as being the synthetic version of heroin. I can't believe someone would prescribe it for a toothache!

Back to the original discussion, I think it was wrong to suspend his license. The average American consumes alcohol too. Maybe not in excess, but it is still consumed. How do they differentiate between the moderate and the excessive user? Doesn't sound like a good law to me. Just taking away some more of our civil liberties...
...Jennifer...


Exactly Babe!! Just another example of the goverment deciding whats best fo US :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Pburgh
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5403
Age: 80
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:36 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

#18 Postby Pburgh » Wed Jul 14, 2004 1:37 pm

It really seems like an invasion of privacy.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests