Major Terror plot foiled against U.K.-U.S. bound flights

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#141 Postby gtalum » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:32 pm

stormtruth wrote:Anyone think this is just a phony recycled Yusef plot from 1995 being used to drum up fear?


I'd be more suspicious if the British weren't involved. They're not known for emotional overreaction and fearmongering.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#142 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:33 pm

This sounds a lot like the Bojinka plot. They could also put explosives inside a terrorist. That's the answer. We should ban people from planes.


What it sounds like is irrelevant... but to quote Clinton (in an askance manner)... what it is.... IS. :wink:

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#143 Postby stormtruth » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:33 pm

gtalum wrote:
stormtruth wrote:Anyone think this is just a phony recycled Yusef plot from 1995 being used to drum up fear?


I'd be more suspicious if the British weren't involved. They're not known for emotional overreaction and fearmongering.


True, but not necessarily but the British or U.S. govt but just leaked by the terrorists to make the governments go nuts.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#144 Postby x-y-no » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:34 pm

zoeyann wrote:Yeah see I would hope that even if they can not detect explosive liquids in the cargo they would x-ray to find anything that looks to be a detonator. I would assume anything being detonated in this fashion would have to be metal.


All the large airports have scanning equipment related to CAT Scanners which can detect explosives by their chemical compostion (all high explosives are related in chemical structure, and all are nitrogen compounds).

Unfortunately, it's impractical to have this equipment for carry-on baggage as it's very large.

I've also read that for some reason, much of the third party cargo (as opposed to checked baggage) doesn't go through this scanning. I don't know it that's true or not, or why that would be so.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38106
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#145 Postby Brent » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:35 pm

Apparently one of the suspects already in custody WORKED at Heathrow.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#146 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:36 pm

The terrorists, including still at large Bin Laden, are smart and they are proud now.


Please tell me why the need to mention UBL?? :uarrow: Sort of smacks of bringing back that political ax-- while it has all the earmarks of an Al-Qaeda effort... the "terrorists" we're interested in here are not in Afghanistan (or Pakistan, or where-have-you)... they're in the UK... and they're being sought out. Let's try to stick to that!

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#147 Postby x-y-no » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:37 pm

Audrey2Katrina wrote:
This sounds a lot like the Bojinka plot. They could also put explosives inside a terrorist. That's the answer. We should ban people from planes.


What it sounds like is irrelevant... but to quote Clinton (in an askance manner)... what it is.... IS. :wink:

A2K



Actually, I'm not at all surprised to see al Qaeda (and I presume this was al Qaeda) recycling the basics of the Bojinka plot. The idea was sound. I've rather been expecting them to try it again (as obviously have MI5).
0 likes   

User avatar
nystate
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1207
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 2:58 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC

#148 Postby nystate » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:37 pm

What part of this don't you understand? Moving liquids from the cabin to the cargo hold does NOTHING to prevent explosives from being detonated. Remote detonation is extremely easy.

The new restrictions are thus 100% completely ineffective against this threat. So my alternative is to let people on the plane with their toiletries. In the long run, we can keep rushing the installation of explosives sniffers to get as many flights as possible covered.


Not true. The bombs uncovered here had to be detonated physically...therefore, if they are in the hold they can't be detonated. It would take further modification to assemble a remote bomb (which means more time), and therefore the immediate concentration of the authorities is on liquid bombs that must be physically detonated.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#149 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:37 pm

Even though it didn't destroy any planes it will make people less likely to fly because of the crazy restrictions.


Yup... it's those CRAZY restrictions... I say we drop 'em all!

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#150 Postby stormtruth » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:39 pm

Audrey2Katrina wrote:
The terrorists, including still at large Bin Laden, are smart and they are proud now.


Please tell me why the need to mention UBL?? :uarrow: Sort of smacks of bringing back that political ax-- while it has all the earmarks of an Al-Qaeda effort... the "terrorists" we're interested in here are not in Afghanistan (or Pakistan, or where-have-you)... they're in the UK... and they're being sought out. Let's try to stick to that!

A2K


How in the world is terrorism not related the UBL? You've got to be kidding?
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#151 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:39 pm

Audrey2Katrina wrote:
The terrorists, including still at large Bin Laden, are smart and they are proud now.


Please tell me why the need to mention UBL?? :uarrow: Sort of smacks of bringing back that political ax-- while it has all the earmarks of an Al-Qaeda effort... the "terrorists" we're interested in here are not in Afghanistan (or Pakistan, or where-have-you)... they're in the UK... and they're being sought out. Let's try to stick to that!

A2K



Because that is their way of getting around our political rule. But, not going to happen.

I do not care if they are proud or not. They were stopped, that is all that matters to me. If it looks like a rat, smells like a rat, it probably is a rat.
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#152 Postby Skywatch_NC » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:39 pm

Brent wrote:Apparently one of the suspects already in custody WORKED at Heathrow.


And who knows...he may have had some flight training there as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#153 Postby stormtruth » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:40 pm

Lindaloo wrote:
Audrey2Katrina wrote:
The terrorists, including still at large Bin Laden, are smart and they are proud now.


Please tell me why the need to mention UBL?? :uarrow: Sort of smacks of bringing back that political ax-- while it has all the earmarks of an Al-Qaeda effort... the "terrorists" we're interested in here are not in Afghanistan (or Pakistan, or where-have-you)... they're in the UK... and they're being sought out. Let's try to stick to that!

A2K



Because that is their way of getting around our political rule. But, not going to happen.

I do not care if they are proud or not. They were stopped, that is all that matters to me. If it looks like a rat, smells like a rat, it probably is a rat.


Sorry, didn't realize Osama Bin Laden is political now.
0 likes   

User avatar
nystate
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1207
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 2:58 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC

#154 Postby nystate » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:41 pm

Allowing people to carry-on toothpaste isn't going to bring planes down over teh Atlantic.

Intelligence and law enforcement did a good job busting up this ring. Rather than burden ourselves with useless restrictions, let's just have them keep doing their jobs.


They arrested 21 people. They believe up to 50 may be involved. What if just 1 out of those 50 is in an airport with his liquid bomb ready? Solution-ban all liquids and electronics and bada-bing, the problem is solved.

Anyone think this is just a phony recycled Yusef plot from 1995 being used to drum up fear?


No. I think you are in denial of the obvious though...
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#155 Postby stormtruth » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:41 pm

Airports in Chaos. Top of MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ People are losing bottles of wine, gifts, everything.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#156 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:45 pm

How in the world is terrorism not related the UBL? You've got to be kidding?


You're real good at putting words in peoples's mouths; but it ain't gonna work with me. I didn't remotely suggest that terorism isn't related to UBL now did I? I asked what relevance it had to what was being discussed here--and asked that we stick to that, without bringing up peripheral issues that just might let us slip in a political sideswipe. I suspect Linda has hit the nail on the head!

No Kidding!

A2K
0 likes   

User avatar
nystate
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1207
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 2:58 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC

#157 Postby nystate » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:45 pm

stormtruth wrote:Airports in Chaos. Top of MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ People are losing bottles of wine, gifts, everything.


Believe me, if this plot had succeeded the entire country would be in chaos, not just a few airports.
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#158 Postby gtalum » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:46 pm

But the plot didn't succeed. And we put the airports in chaos anyway. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#159 Postby x-y-no » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:48 pm

nystate wrote:
stormtruth wrote:Airports in Chaos. Top of MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ People are losing bottles of wine, gifts, everything.


Believe me, if this plot had succeeded the entire country would be in chaos, not just a few airports.


Not just this country. The entire western world. The presumption would have to be that they could target international flights pretty much anywhere.
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#160 Postby Skywatch_NC » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:50 pm

gtalum wrote:But the plot didn't succeed. And we put the airports in chaos anyway. :lol:


You have to remember that not ALL the *whatevers* involved in this plot have been arrested...
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests