timNms wrote: The Lord said "be fruitful and multiply."
So, because we can't procreate, we shouldn't be allowed to marry?
What does that say about a man who is unable to get a woman pregnant or a woman who can't get pregnant? Because they can't "be fruitful and multiply," they shouldn't be allowed to marry either? What about those rare souls who are born with genitalia dysfunction or, even stranger, those who are born with both? And what does it say about the ones who love them? Are they not allowed to be happy with who they love?
And just why the hell can transsexuals get married if gays can't????? Did you know that if (I'm using these names for the sake of an example) Ben Affleck had surgery to become a woman (Jenn Affleck), he/she could then legally change his/her name to reflect his/her new identity as a woman. Then Jenn could marry Matt Damon legally and in a church. What sense does that make? They couldn't procreate either. And yet, there is absolutely nothing that says they can't marry, simply because the legally documented sex of one partner is "male" and of the other is "female." Thus, subscribing to the standard basis that marriage is between a man and a woman.
And transsexualism IS a choice! They are changing their bodies from how they were BORN to something they CHOOSE to be. It's not natural to me and I don't understand it. But that's just my opinion, based on what little I know about it.
(BTW, I wouldn't be surprised about Matt Damon and Ben Affleck [minus the surgery, of course] but that's just based on my first impression of them.)