GOM Oil Spill - BP Stops Oil Leak

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#341 Postby brunota2003 » Sat May 29, 2010 12:17 pm

It's the equivalent of trying to stop an oil gusher in space...except the pressure is obviously much higher.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#342 Postby Nimbus » Sat May 29, 2010 4:55 pm

Why couldn't they just drop something the size of a Barnum and Bailey circus tent over the thing and pump the oil out of the top? A hundred yards above the leak the oil is not flowing at a high rate and they could use whatever kind of heaters they needed to use to keep the oil flow viscous.
0 likes   

User avatar
WeatherLovingDoc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#343 Postby WeatherLovingDoc » Sat May 29, 2010 6:02 pm

BP OFFICIAL: TOP KILL FAILED.......

Under the new plan, BP would cut off the damaged riser from which the oil is leaking and cap it with a containment valve.

(edit: the saw was used briefly by the ROV on the riser, created some smoke, then suddenly stopped. Arms were withdrawn and eventually, the saw dropped to the seabed, intentionally or not). May have been a dry run to see underwater effect, level of control by operator, precision?).

More good stuff here: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6528
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#344 Postby RL3AO » Sat May 29, 2010 7:20 pm

Nimbus wrote:Why couldn't they just drop something the size of a Barnum and Bailey circus tent over the thing and pump the oil out of the top? A hundred yards above the leak the oil is not flowing at a high rate and they could use whatever kind of heaters they needed to use to keep the oil flow viscous.


Thats what I'm thinking. You just need a huge upside down funnel. The oil will enter the funnel then have a hose at the top of the funnel that goes to the surface and into a ship. Not a permanent solution but it buys time.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#345 Postby Sanibel » Sat May 29, 2010 7:47 pm

It seems like even with the depth it isn't very difficult, technology wise, to get oil to the surface.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#346 Postby Aquawind » Sat May 29, 2010 8:03 pm

Dang the luck.. So many ideas and unlimited funds I would think..yet no fix yet. I have a hard time with the fact that this kind of situation has happened without a real plan. They need to have failsafe redundancy for these problems..

They should be able to take immediate action with a set protocol for any type of leak and any environment they work in. Seems they hadn't thought of the obvious possibility and with all at stake that is plain stupid.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#347 Postby Dionne » Sun May 30, 2010 6:57 am

RL3AO wrote:
Nimbus wrote:Why couldn't they just drop something the size of a Barnum and Bailey circus tent over the thing and pump the oil out of the top? A hundred yards above the leak the oil is not flowing at a high rate and they could use whatever kind of heaters they needed to use to keep the oil flow viscous.


Thats what I'm thinking. You just need a huge upside down funnel. The oil will enter the funnel then have a hose at the top of the funnel that goes to the surface and into a ship. Not a permanent solution but it buys time.


What your describing is technology that does exist. It's required in some regions before drilling operations begin. It's just not required in the GoM.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#348 Postby vbhoutex » Sun May 30, 2010 8:41 am

Dionne wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Nimbus wrote:Why couldn't they just drop something the size of a Barnum and Bailey circus tent over the thing and pump the oil out of the top? A hundred yards above the leak the oil is not flowing at a high rate and they could use whatever kind of heaters they needed to use to keep the oil flow viscous.


Thats what I'm thinking. You just need a huge upside down funnel. The oil will enter the funnel then have a hose at the top of the funnel that goes to the surface and into a ship. Not a permanent solution but it buys time.


What your describing is technology that does exist. It's required in some regions before drilling operations begin. It's just not required in the GoM.

Sounds like it is time to make those things be required off any US coast!!! Not that it will help the GOM since it will be dead for years, if not decades. :cry:
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re:

#349 Postby Stephanie » Sun May 30, 2010 9:09 am

Aquawind wrote:Dang the luck.. So many ideas and unlimited funds I would think..yet no fix yet. I have a hard time with the fact that this kind of situation has happened without a real plan. They need to have failsafe redundancy for these problems..

They should be able to take immediate action with a set protocol for any type of leak and any environment they work in. Seems they hadn't thought of the obvious possibility and with all at stake that is plain stupid.


This worst case scenerio was never planned for and it was assumed by the government that it was, in a nutshell. It costs $$$$ to plan for something that may never happen and GOD FORBID they should waste money on that! :x
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#350 Postby Dionne » Sun May 30, 2010 9:18 am

There is now evidence that the BOP annular was in a state of failure. Pieces of the annular were being spit out on the rig deck prior to the blow out. As a former oil field worker (Prudhoe Bay) continuing to operate with this knowledge is unimaginable. It's no wonder there were arguments on the rig just prior to the explosive blow out. This is now criminal negligence.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#351 Postby Aquawind » Sun May 30, 2010 9:32 am

Stephanie wrote:
Aquawind wrote:Dang the luck.. So many ideas and unlimited funds I would think..yet no fix yet. I have a hard time with the fact that this kind of situation has happened without a real plan. They need to have failsafe redundancy for these problems..

They should be able to take immediate action with a set protocol for any type of leak and any environment they work in. Seems they hadn't thought of the obvious possibility and with all at stake that is plain stupid.


This worst case scenerio was never planned for and it was assumed by the government that it was, in a nutshell. It costs $$$$ to plan for something that may never happen and GOD FORBID they should waste money on that! :x


Seems like money is a issue here afterall.. The issue I have is they don't even understand the physics of thier enviroment. They didn't even have an imeadiate response to the leak itself. Even without exstensive testing they can still crunch some numbers and brainstorm this to setup a number of options for a deepwater enviroment.

Anyway what the heck are they waiting 4-7 days to make this thing for..options should be lined up..I don't care if the cap alone is a billion bucks..Seems BP being a cheapskate..
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#352 Postby Stephanie » Sun May 30, 2010 9:47 am

IMHO, each backup plan should be ready before the new one is even implemented.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#353 Postby Aquawind » Sun May 30, 2010 10:12 am

Absolutely! If money is an issue to make that happen then they need to say so and get the funding..
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#354 Postby Sanibel » Sun May 30, 2010 10:32 am

Word is anyone on the rig has authority to hit the red button but no one did and they were waiting to call headquarters to get permission when the thing blew. They were intimidated by the feeding chain and while they waited the hydraulic lines to the Blowout Preventer shear rams were severed causing loss of function.

They are also saying BP used inadequately thin casing for a high gas exploratory well and was aware of it but did it to save money.

This whole thing happened because they were rushing to save money. It is now costing them billions.
0 likes   

User avatar
barometerJane61
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 8:27 am
Location: Texas

Hurricanes and the Oil Spill: A Factsheet and Frequent Quest

#355 Postby barometerJane61 » Sun May 30, 2010 11:42 am

Thanks for the copy . Oh my.I shudder to think about a hurricane throwing the oil farther inland with surge. :( Alittle off topic,but I won't rest untill BP CEOs are in jail for what they have done
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#356 Postby brunota2003 » Sun May 30, 2010 12:43 pm

Going back to the box that they dropped over the well...the reason it failed was because under extreme pressure and cold, the gas formed into hydrates, and then plugged up the inside of the pipes? Or was it when they contacted the cold surface of the concrete that caused them to ice up? Trying to understand exactly what caused it to fail.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re: GOM Oil Spill - LIVE video of the "Top Kill" procedure

#357 Postby Dionne » Sun May 30, 2010 12:58 pm

Hydrates store immense amounts of methane, with major implications for energy resources and climate, but the natural controls on hydrates and their impacts on the environment are very poorly understood.

Gas hydrates occur abundantly in nature, both in Arctic regions and in marine sediments. Gas hydrate is a crystalline solid consisting of gas molecules, usually methane, each surrounded by a cage of water molecules. It looks very much like water ice. Methane hydrate is stable in ocean floor sediments at water depths greater than 300 meters, and where it occurs, it is known to cement loose sediments in a surface layer several hundred meters thick.

The above is a portion of a fact sheet from USGS. ......"very poorly understood".......should answer your question.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#358 Postby brunota2003 » Sun May 30, 2010 1:10 pm

Why are we drilling into something we barely even understand?
0 likes   

Dencolo
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:40 pm

Re:

#359 Postby Dencolo » Sun May 30, 2010 3:12 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Going back to the box that they dropped over the well...the reason it failed was because under extreme pressure and cold, the gas formed into hydrates, and then plugged up the inside of the pipes? Or was it when they contacted the cold surface of the concrete that caused them to ice up? Trying to understand exactly what caused it to fail.


Most hydrates in the oilfield occur at a choke point due to the Jules-Thompsan (sp?) effect. When there is a restriction and a corresponding pressure drop, that pressure drop causes ice like hydrate crystals to form. I suppose somewhere in this funnel there was just too much of a pressure drop across some object, and these hydrates occurred. That is what is difficult about what most see as the simplest idea (the funnel). It is unfortunate how much gas is flowing with the oil to compound this problem.

As far as why we're drilling in an area we don't "understand'? Actually, deepwater drilling operations are understood well and while difficult should pose little risk. But the fact is, if corners are cut something devastating can happen, as shown. In fact a lot of deepwater drilling in the GOM is continuing (even new drilling), but it's that new permits are not being given at this point.

While not all the facts are in, more and more is pointing to very poor decision making by the BP rep on the Horizon. The end story should be interesting. How this can happen in one of the most regulated bodies of water (GOM) with one of the most regulating entities (US govt) by one of the companies notorious for making their employees attend hours upon hours of safety meetings (BP) is beyond me. Just tragic.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#360 Postby brunota2003 » Sun May 30, 2010 3:51 pm

Dencolo wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Going back to the box that they dropped over the well...the reason it failed was because under extreme pressure and cold, the gas formed into hydrates, and then plugged up the inside of the pipes? Or was it when they contacted the cold surface of the concrete that caused them to ice up? Trying to understand exactly what caused it to fail.


Most hydrates in the oilfield occur at a choke point due to the Jules-Thompsan (sp?) effect. When there is a restriction and a corresponding pressure drop, that pressure drop causes ice like hydrate crystals to form. I suppose somewhere in this funnel there was just too much of a pressure drop across some object, and these hydrates occurred. That is what is difficult about what most see as the simplest idea (the funnel). It is unfortunate how much gas is flowing with the oil to compound this problem.

As far as why we're drilling in an area we don't "understand'? Actually, deepwater drilling operations are understood well and while difficult should pose little risk. But the fact is, if corners are cut something devastating can happen, as shown. In fact a lot of deepwater drilling in the GOM is continuing (even new drilling), but it's that new permits are not being given at this point.

While not all the facts are in, more and more is pointing to very poor decision making by the BP rep on the Horizon. The end story should be interesting. How this can happen in one of the most regulated bodies of water (GOM) with one of the most regulating entities (US govt) by one of the companies notorious for making their employees attend hours upon hours of safety meetings (BP) is beyond me. Just tragic.

Thanks for the reply and in depth analysis. So under pressure, the gas couldn't turn into hydrates at the temperatures they were at...but once the pressure dropped, they turned. So an increase in heat would be needed to keep the drop of pressure from allowing the gas to turn into hydrates, right? Or less heat?
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests