Cracker Barrel Being Sued for Racism

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
chadtm80

#41 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:44 pm

I get crappy service ALL the time.. How many times do you think I have said it is because I am white? Just ludicris
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#42 Postby gtalum » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:47 pm

What's ludicrous is pretending you know all the details to the story.
0 likes   

chadtm80

#43 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:48 pm

Didn't do that what so ever.. Glad you can see into my head though :-)
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#44 Postby gtalum » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:51 pm

chadtm80 wrote:Didn't do that what so ever.. Glad you can see into my head though


I can read. You state that the claim is ludicrous. The only way you could know that the claim is ludicrous is if you know all the details of the incident. So you imply that you know all the details when you say the claim is ludicrous. ;)
0 likes   

chadtm80

#45 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:58 pm

The claim is Ludicrous :-) Very Very Ludicrous :-)
0 likes   

rainstorm

#46 Postby rainstorm » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:03 pm

i think its absolutely ludicrous. i dont think for a second the wait staff at cracker barrell, or a few waitresses got together one day and said we hate the guts of blacks and we will ignore black customers, even if it means we will get sued, fired, held up for national ridicule and get dragged into court. sorry its ludicrous and these shakedowns are occuring rather frequently now
0 likes   

chadtm80

#47 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:05 pm

Say for a second it was racism.. What exactly should they be given then? couple million dollars maybe?

IF someone didnt serve me because I was white, I would say fine, walk right out and take my money else where.. Suing would be the last thing on my mind.
0 likes   

User avatar
Regit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2341
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach

#48 Postby Regit » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:18 pm

Ok, as gtalum pointed out, people think they know all the details.

Here are some more details that people need to know.

-The lawsuit is not the result of this single incident. Ms. Rock suspected the incident was because of racism and contacted others, including Mr. Sharpton. As a result, it was discovered that there has been a pattern of these kinds of allegations against Cracker Barrel restaurants.

-The lawsuit is seeking class-action status, which means monetary benefits will be minimal.

-No one believes Cracker Barrel is deeply racist and out to get black people. Sharpton's group is alleging that the company does not properly train employees to handle all customers equally and does not properly punish employees for such incidents.

-The point of the lawsuit is to change the practices of the restaurant to assure that black people are treated fairly.
0 likes   

chadtm80

#49 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:35 pm

Mr Sharpton thinks just about everyone is out to get black people. He is the most racist person I know
0 likes   

User avatar
GrimReaper
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 10:17 pm

#50 Postby GrimReaper » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:38 pm

Regit, with all due respect, and I LOVE the gecko, I don't think that is true. I think Sharpton, and the Rock family are just needing a fix of attention, and maybe a few $$$$$.
0 likes   

User avatar
Regit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2341
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach

#51 Postby Regit » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:40 pm

GrimReaper wrote:Regit, with all due respect, and I LOVE the gecko, I don't think that is true. I think Sharpton, and the Rock family are just needing a fix of attention, and maybe a few $$$$$.



There are far more people than just them involved in the suit. There are several families making claims. Ms. Rock is just being put in the spotlight because of her last name.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#52 Postby MGC » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:41 pm

The first mistake that was made was going to Cracker Barrel. IMO, CB sucks. I've been a few times and every time I ate there it sucked. As far as the claims of racism goes, this is a crutch many in the African-American community leans on. I bet you can find a million white people how have been ignored at a restaurant. I know I have. I've gotten up and walked out of several places because I was ignored. This happens all the time and I doubt it is because of the color of one's skin. This is Sharpton's and Jessy Jacksons MO. They extort monies from companies with threats of racism. Ever see Jessy or Al at a job working? Money has got to come from somewhere.....MGC
0 likes   

rainstorm

#53 Postby rainstorm » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:47 pm

Regit wrote:Ok, as gtalum pointed out, people think they know all the details.

Here are some more details that people need to know.

-The lawsuit is not the result of this single incident. Ms. Rock suspected the incident was because of racism and contacted others, including Mr. Sharpton. As a result, it was discovered that there has been a pattern of these kinds of allegations against Cracker Barrel restaurants.

-The lawsuit is seeking class-action status, which means monetary benefits will be minimal.

-No one believes Cracker Barrel is deeply racist and out to get black people. Sharpton's group is alleging that the company does not properly train employees to handle all customers equally and does not properly punish employees for such incidents.

-The point of the lawsuit is to change the practices of the restaurant to assure that black people are treated fairly.


same shakedown pattern they do from company to company. now i know its bogus and ludicrous
0 likes   

rainstorm

#54 Postby rainstorm » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:49 pm

sharpton may be the biggest racist in the room, so to speak. again, remember tawanna brawley. sharpton should be in prison over that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#55 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:57 pm

Jesse Jackson also tried the racism crap and going public because there were NO black drivers in the Nascar circuit. If there are NO black drivers, so what? Teresa Earnhardt challenged him and he went away. That proves they have an agenda!

gtalum and Regit.... it is funny to me that at first when you thought it was racism you two were posting, posting, posting. Now that others view it for what it really is you both are saying let's wait until all the facts are out. Why didn't you say that about Wesley Snipes?

Oh goodness at the double standards of some folks. :roll:
0 likes   

rainstorm

#56 Postby rainstorm » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:59 pm

Regit wrote:Ok, as gtalum pointed out, people think they know all the details.

Here are some more details that people need to know.

-The lawsuit is not the result of this single incident. Ms. Rock suspected the incident was because of racism and contacted others, including Mr. Sharpton. As a result, it was discovered that there has been a pattern of these kinds of allegations against Cracker Barrel restaurants.

-The lawsuit is seeking class-action status, which means monetary benefits will be minimal.

-No one believes Cracker Barrel is deeply racist and out to get black people. Sharpton's group is alleging that the company does not properly train employees to handle all customers equally and does not properly punish employees for such incidents.

-The point of the lawsuit is to change the practices of the restaurant to assure that black people are treated fairly.


you are right about one thing. in the denny's case, which was bogus as well, supposedly 295,000 blacks were discriminated against. denny's paid out 177 bucks to each supposed black who was discriminated against. who pocketed the big bucks extorted from denny's? the shakedown lawyers. who will pocket the big bucks against cracker barrell? the shakedown lawyers
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#57 Postby gtalum » Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:04 pm

Lindaloo wrote:gtalum and Regit.... it is funny to me that at first when you thought it was racism you two were posting, posting, posting. Now that others view it for what it really is you both are saying let's wait until all the facts are out. Why didn't you say that about Wesley Snipes?


I never said it was racism I just said it's silly to pretend to know all the facts of the case. ;)

As for Wesley Snipes, he has shown a propensity for this type of behavior in the past and he has associated himself with others who do the same. It's common sense.

Similarly, Cracker Barrel has been shown to have acted in a racist way in the past, so it casts suspicion on them. It's the way of the world.
0 likes   

rainstorm

#58 Postby rainstorm » Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:07 pm

they move from one company to the next with the exact same pattern. as soon as they collect from cracker barrell another group of blacks will claim they were discriminated at another restaurant chain. the pattern will be exactly the same.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pburgh
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5403
Age: 80
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:36 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

#59 Postby Pburgh » Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:10 pm

Funny how little "mom and pop" stores with very little revenue are never selected by Jackson and Sharpton. Do you think it's cause they just don't have enough money to benefit their cause??
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#60 Postby gtalum » Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:12 pm

You're right, there's no benefit to suing small fry. That doens't negate the validity, nor does it prove the validity, of a lawsuit.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests